From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Dec 11 7:45: 6 2000 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 11 07:45:04 2000 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pan.salford.ac.uk (pan.salford.ac.uk [146.87.255.104]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A49F537B402 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2000 07:45:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 37234 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2000 15:45:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 37217 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2000 15:45:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO plato.salford.ac.uk) (146.87.255.76) by pan.salford.ac.uk with SMTP; 11 Dec 2000 15:45:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 36350 invoked by uid 141); 11 Dec 2000 15:45:02 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 Dec 2000 15:45:02 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 15:45:02 +0000 (GMT) From: Mark Powell To: Chris Faulhaber Cc: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Different gcc optimisations cause IP packet CRC problems In-Reply-To: <20001211103638.A21163@peitho.fxp.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Chris Faulhaber wrote: > No, but you may want to review the mailing list archives since GCC > optimization problems have been rehash many times (see also the notes > in /etc/defaults/make.conf WRT optimization). I hadn't seen those comments. I didn't think gcc could be *that* broken. Cheers. Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford Academic Information Services, Clifford Whitworth Building, Salford University, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Tel: +44 161 295 5936 Fax: +44 161 295 5888 www.pgp.com for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message