Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:34:15 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: squid and privoxy Message-ID: <0f74c945-5e32-c29c-c204-48a06dec0eec@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BtpaK1RbWL77E6no_oU%2BC7LDJK=P3wGod5q4Y%2Bez-O99TvMoQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <1514555403.55217.1.camel@yandex.com> <CA%2BtpaK1RbWL77E6no_oU%2BC7LDJK=P3wGod5q4Y%2Bez-O99TvMoQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/29/17 14:57, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Stari Karp <starikarp@yandex.com> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I have a single desktop computer. I did read about squid and privoxy >> combination how good is for Internet browsing safety. If is true do I >> need both or is just one of them enough. >> > > You don't need either. > Well, Squid+ClamAV *might* help with "safety", if that's what the OP is looking for. Since he talks about Privoxy, I wonder if it's "privacy" he's after. bye av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0f74c945-5e32-c29c-c204-48a06dec0eec>