Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 30 Dec 2017 15:34:15 +0100
From:      Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: squid and privoxy
Message-ID:  <0f74c945-5e32-c29c-c204-48a06dec0eec@netfence.it>
In-Reply-To: <CA+tpaK1RbWL77E6no_oU+C7LDJK=P3wGod5q4Y+ez-O99TvMoQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <1514555403.55217.1.camel@yandex.com> <CA+tpaK1RbWL77E6no_oU+C7LDJK=P3wGod5q4Y+ez-O99TvMoQ@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 12/29/17 14:57, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Stari Karp <starikarp@yandex.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have a single desktop computer. I did read about squid and privoxy
>> combination how good is for Internet browsing safety. If is true do I
>> need both or is just one of them enough.
>>
> 
> You don't need either.
> 

Well, Squid+ClamAV *might* help with "safety", if that's what the OP is 
looking for.
Since he talks about Privoxy, I wonder if it's "privacy" he's after.

  bye
	av.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0f74c945-5e32-c29c-c204-48a06dec0eec>