From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 22 11:38:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B27A1106566C for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:38:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amarat@ksu.ru) Received: from mx.kzn.ru (mx.kzn.ru [194.85.243.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BFAB8FC17 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:38:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amarat@ksu.ru) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,402,1233522000"; d="scan'208";a="2497450" Received: from mail.ksu.ru (HELO ruby.ksu.ru) ([193.232.252.56]) by iout.kzn.ru with ESMTP; 22 Mar 2009 14:38:18 +0300 X-Pass-Through: Kazan State University Network Received: from zealot.ksu.ru ([194.85.245.161]) by ksu.ru (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id n2MBaBHx027389; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:36:11 GMT Received: from zealot.ksu.ru (localhost.lnet [127.0.0.1]) by zealot.ksu.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2MBbRtc091270; Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:37:28 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from amarat@ksu.ru) Message-ID: <49C622F7.2030503@ksu.ru> Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:37:27 +0300 From: "Marat N.Afanasyev" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090124 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pete French References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KDB+DDB make interrupt storm on MSI motherboards go away it seems X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:38:23 -0000 Pete French wrote: > I admit I was scepticle of this suggestion - but it actually seems to > have worked. COmpiling a straight GENERIC kernel with KDB and DDB > included do seem to have made my irq22 interrupt storms go away. > Certainly I have spent some time trying to provoke the problem and not > managed to make it read it's ugly head again. > > The thing is though, this doen't make me particularly happy - as I am > sure that KDB and DDB are not supposed to make any major changes to > how the kernel functions are they ? > > -pete. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > no major changes, indeed, but a couple of small changes, e.g. implicit turning off all optimizations. -- SY, Marat