From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Mar 29 4:21:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ginnungagap.sweet-sorrow.com (ginnungagap.we-administer.net [193.189.161.251]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80E937B71D for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 04:21:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from einherjer@sweet-sorrow.com) Received: from Us-lap (us-lap.siol.net [193.189.161.84]) by ginnungagap.sweet-sorrow.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D2018C83 for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:23:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <200103291422040876.057A2F29@ginnungagap.sweet-sorrow.com> In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20010329141558.022ee9e0@mail.Go2France.com> References: <3AC31F58.EC12CD32@plusline.net> <200103291347320135.055A8E85@ginnungagap.sweet-sorrow.com> <5.0.0.25.0.20010329141558.022ee9e0@mail.Go2France.com> X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.20.01.00 (4) Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:22:04 +0200 From: "einherjer" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MAIL/HTML GateWay for Cyrus Imapd on FreeBSD Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well I only have a few (10) users so I cannot judge for it. My opinion is= based only on the configuring part of the software. *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 3/29/2001 at 14:16 Len Conrad wrote: >At 13:48 29/03/01 +0200, you wrote: >>My personal experience is in favor of Squirrel mail >>(http://www.squirrelmail.org/) > >How many simultaneous users? scaleable? lightweight or resource hungry? > >Len > > > >http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training : In Austin, TX; SFO, CA; Paris, >FR >http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : ISC BIND 8.2.3 "NT3" for NT4 & W2K >http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-abuse mail gateways > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message