From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 29 13:46:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC77C16A41F for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:46:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mischa2023@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EA043D53 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:46:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mischa2023@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t12so1271624wxc for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:46:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UV3SgBkXR99C/Acx+I9ohaKlqWydqQmmMrflEXpug/FinSzhh7AcwM4aSJWq7zGO/LCSrv80xZbLAXyDye+wnFWPx9LgSFOLu6d1HuYeu4gudevXbtMXNqDm8FWCr2Tq+xBeosELMNv4zzVnj4nwFujBf68bLM69bQGp7DWlgVY= Received: by 10.70.87.8 with SMTP id k8mr2194282wxb; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:46:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.48.16 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:46:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 14:46:30 +0100 From: Mischa Peters To: freebsd ports In-Reply-To: <1660867A-CB96-4324-8F06-DE25D233050E@khera.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6364140F-2C30-489B-9B38-BFF503F66499@khera.org> <1660867A-CB96-4324-8F06-DE25D233050E@khera.org> Subject: Re: Subversion 1.3.0-rc2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:46:31 -0000 Hi Vivek, > Hmmm... this leads me to then question whether Mischa is using BDB > backend of FSFS backend? Perhaps it is related to only one of them. > I know that once I upgraded subversion and the BDB version default > changed which caused my repos to be unusable until I did the BDB > upgrade procedure. I am not using FSFS. What is the BDB upgrade procedure? But I feel that someone made a real error in judgement on this, 1.3.0-rc2 should have never be allowed to replace the stable port of Subversion. And it would make sense to revert back to 1.2.3. Mischa