Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 21:20:06 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: "B. Cook" <bcook@idsi.net> Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hello :) Message-ID: <15041.19030.575231.665223@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <000801c0b72b$54198810$0b01a8c0@mystique2k> References: <000801c0b72b$54198810$0b01a8c0@mystique2k>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
B. Cook writes: > > > and well, when it was building the 'world' and kernel I noticed the -mcpu=ev4 option being passed to gcc. Well, I thought this would have been a ev56. It is. -mcpu=ev4 is the conservative "works for everybody" flag. Otherwise gcc will end up producing binaries that don't run on older alphas when the compile is done on a newer alpha. The -mcpu-ev56 vs -mcpu-ev4 cpu is almost certainly a red herring. How about building it with -g and running gdb on it and the core dump to find out where its crashing? Drew PS: Please just post text to these mailing lists. No need to duplicate things in html. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15041.19030.575231.665223>