Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:24:15 +0100
From:      Ben Paley <ben@spooty.net>
To:        Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
Cc:        "freebsd -questions@" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: three libtools - portupgrade question
Message-ID:  <200406231124.16337.ben@spooty.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040622225710.GB51531@dan.emsphone.com>
References:  <200406222350.19588.ben@spooty.net> <20040622225710.GB51531@dan.emsphone.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 23:57, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Jun 22), Ben Paley said:
> > I've got three versions of libtool on my system:
> >
> > bash-2.05b$ pkg_info | grep libtool
> > libtool-1.3.5_2     Generic shared library support script (version 1.3)
> > libtool-1.4.3_2     Generic shared library support script
> > libtool-1.5         Generic shared library support script
> > bash-2.05b$
> >
> > Does it need to be like that? or can I safely do something like
>
> They are all independent ports and don't conflict.  Ideally all ports
> would require 1.5.  You can safely delete 1.3 and 1.4, and if you
> install a port that depends on one of the older versions, it'll just
> reinstall it.

Thanks a lot, I'll do that.

Cheers,
Ben



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200406231124.16337.ben>