Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 00:56:02 +0300 From: Samy Al Bahra <samy@kerneled.org> To: "Neal E. Westfall" <nwestfal@dslextreme.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Negative Review of FreeBSD 5.4 Message-ID: <1117749362.90128.2.camel@jee.workstation.local> In-Reply-To: <20050602100934.Y20286@Osgiliath.home.lan> References: <429EF96E.16172.33600ABA@localhost> <20050602100934.Y20286@Osgiliath.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 10:47 -0700, Neal E. Westfall wrote: > >> Anybody have any thoughts on this review? > >> > >> http://os.newsforge.com/article.pl?sid=05/05/24/2153257&tid=8 > > > > I suggest you provide your thoughts first. With all due respect to the author, I see many biases (and sufficient ignorance). From his note that ULE is the "official scheduler" and that "FreeBSD 5.4 lacks any major changes". -- Samy Al Bahra |------- http://samy.kerneled.org |------- http://www.FreeBSD.org '------- http://www.arabeyes.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1117749362.90128.2.camel>