From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 25 19:23:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 428C6EE6; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 19:23:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19EA42C0E; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 19:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 312ACB93B; Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:23:05 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r257131 - head/sys/geom Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:23:03 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20130906; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201310251919.r9PJJCwD094911@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201310251919.r9PJJCwD094911@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201310251523.04052.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:23:05 -0400 (EDT) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 19:23:07 -0000 On Friday, October 25, 2013 3:19:12 pm John Baldwin wrote: > Author: jhb > Date: Fri Oct 25 19:19:12 2013 > New Revision: 257131 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/257131 > > Log: > Reject attempts to attack a disk device that has the old NEEDSGIANT > flag set. Actually, attacking a Giant disk device is just fine (and encouraged!), it's attaching that is forbidden. :-P Pointed out by: rdivacky -- John Baldwin