Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:02:39 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> To: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@unixdaemons.com> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Jeff Roberson <jeff@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys proc.h src/sys/kern sched_4bsd.c Message-ID: <20030115225940.X52297-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> In-Reply-To: <20030113154600.C53755@unixdaemons.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > "The" new scheduler? > > Which new scheduler? I realize I may have missed a lot of > discussion... I'd like to catch up now, where did the discussion > happen? > I have been writing a new scheduler off and on for several months now. That was the motivation behind the sched_* api. I intend to finish it up and get it commited for 5.1. It supports the following buzz words: ;-) - O(1) operation - Per cpu run queues - CPU binding - CPU affinity In addition, I have a nice tool for testing various scheduler behavior. I have used this to prove that nice, for example, does the same thing with my scheduler as it did with the old one. I will probably commit this tool as well. It runs on linux and I have some interesting datapoints from the linux scheduler. I'll write this up at some point. Cheers, Jeff To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030115225940.X52297-100000>