From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 30 20:21:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7411065673 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:21:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCC68FC2D for ; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:21:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 21025 invoked from network); 30 Oct 2008 20:21:56 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 30 Oct 2008 20:21:56 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3BF0F5082A; Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:21:55 -0400 (EDT) To: stevefranks@ieee.org References: <539c60b90810301128j2493c4c1wc9519a6fef834490@mail.gmail.com> <539c60b90810301129x58a6e5des56c062ecbb262663@mail.gmail.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:21:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <539c60b90810301129x58a6e5des56c062ecbb262663@mail.gmail.com> (Steve Franks's message of "Thu\, 30 Oct 2008 11\:29\:55 -0700") Message-ID: <44iqr9rfz0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: kqemu runs 2x faster on i386 than amd64!? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:21:57 -0000 "Steve Franks" writes: > Guess I should've mentioned the target is 32-bit win2k... If the target isn't the same as the host, I think it's going to have to use (at least partial) emulation instead of direct execution... > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:28 AM, Steve Franks wrote: >> I'm not comparing apples-to-apples exactly, but both my disks are in >> the same system, both are running 7-stable from within the last few >> months, so it's pretty close. Also, the i386 is a direct replacement >> of the amd64 to fix this and other problems, so the software & >> settings set is pretty identical also... >> >> kqemu crawls when I boot amd64 (and I notice the processor is always >> over 50%), and it's reasonalbly usable on i386 (also, the processor is >> often in the 30% range, instead of 60%). >> >> Steve >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/