Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 21:55:47 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Robert Millan <rmh@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KBI bump in r227697? Message-ID: <20120721185547.GD2676@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <CAOfDtXPbLSPoNwaKjtsvFOpx01LfXOcenXkQcbxKY5unn1QOzA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAOfDtXPbLSPoNwaKjtsvFOpx01LfXOcenXkQcbxKY5unn1QOzA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--P0uLJ1D0dtZMuM2h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 05:32:15PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Hi all, Kostik, >=20 > I was just reading through r227697, and it seems to me that this > commit changes KBI. Shouldn't this have a __FreeBSD_version bump? >=20 > My concern is with external file system modules like fuse4bsd > (although on first sight it doesn't seem that fuse4bsd is affected). >=20 > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2011-November/044647.html This is r229703 for stable/9. The __FreeBSD_version was already bumped after that change, at least 3 time= s. In fact, the bump to 900501 in r229723 is almost immediately after it. For HEAD, it makes no sense to bump the revision at all, since you are assumed to always run latest HEAD. --P0uLJ1D0dtZMuM2h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlAK+zMACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4h5fgCgk0QWUwDHwOBJRUNJ71fZ33C+ cBcAoLgISquzaymGsMwDMxdtNwJ0ZkuG =dz9c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --P0uLJ1D0dtZMuM2h--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120721185547.GD2676>