Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:15:50 +0000
From:      "Mark Delany" <x9k@charlie.emu.st>
To:        FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Various problems with 13.0 amd64 on vultr.com
Message-ID:  <0.2.0-final-1618989350.827-0x8feb00@qmda.emu.st>
In-Reply-To: <CAOjFWZ4X3w1Yys5k+BbfnYDqm29+5r-Gtbt46vCvB-42suEAbQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <0.2.0-final-1618742820.474-0x878fa2@qmda.emu.st> <20210420021318.GB18217@blisses.org> <0.2.0-final-1618896757.688-0xb6a34e@qmda.emu.st> <CAOjFWZ4X3w1Yys5k+BbfnYDqm29+5r-Gtbt46vCvB-42suEAbQ@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 20Apr21, Freddie Cash allegedly wrote:

> If you re-write your rules to use the in-kernel libalias support instead of
> divert sockets sending traffic to natd, does it stay up while passing IPv4
> traffic?
> 
> That would help narrow it down even further to natd issues.

I've not used the in-kernel NAT support before so it'll take me a little while, but I'll
give it a shot and report back.


Mark.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0.2.0-final-1618989350.827-0x8feb00>