From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 20 00:46:42 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B641616A4CE; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:46:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at
	[128.131.111.2])	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6540943D1D; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 00:46:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com)
Received: from [128.131.111.60] (acrux [128.131.111.60])
	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6DC1513787; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:46:41 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:46:42 +0100 (CET)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>
To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040220012254.GB4306@dragon.nuxi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0402200945010.84681@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
References: <200402192212.i1JMCUxx092480@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<Pine.BSF.4.58.0402192335590.47964@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
	<20040220012254.GB4306@dragon.nuxi.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org>
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/gcc34 Makefile distinfo
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:46:42 -0000

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, David O'Brien wrote:
>> (In any case, shouldn't amd64-freebsd be renamed back to x86_64-freebsd,
>> given Intel's announcement two days ago?)
> NO!

You are obviously biased (given your day job).

FWIW, personally I'm not fond about ia32e at all, but I suppose that's
something we (as in FreeBSD) should support, and others are going with
AMD's original x86_64 name.

Gerald
-- 
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry)   gerald@pfeifer.com   http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/