Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 20:05:10 +1000 From: "Tim J. Robbins" <tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au> To: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Peter Avalos <pavalos@theshell.com>, freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: df -t option Message-ID: <20020423200510.A1738@treetop.robbins.dropbear.id.au> In-Reply-To: <20020422202257.B72727@espresso.q9media.com>; from mike@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:22:57PM -0400 References: <20020422175047.A37860@treetop.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20020423001418.GA896@theshell.com> <20020422202257.B72727@espresso.q9media.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:22:57PM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote: > I agree. In -stable, -T could become an alias for -t, and using -t > instead of -T could result in a warning noting its deprecated status. > I did something similar when I added the -p option to whois(1). A quick grep shows that the mount(8) and umount(8) utilities, but nothing else, use -t to specify the filesystem type. What do you propose be done with these utilities? Leaving mount/umount alone seems like the right thing to do to me, but it may also be confusing. Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020423200510.A1738>