From owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org  Wed Jun 22 08:05:21 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995D6B0382B
 for <freebsd-ipfw@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 22 Jun 2016 08:05:21 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88E602561
 for <freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 08:05:21 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u5M85LfE090103
 for <freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 08:05:21 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 210408] Problem with outgoing traffic using ipfw and kernel nat
 originated from local address
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 08:05:21 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-RELEASE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: smithi@nimnet.asn.au
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-210408-7515-F93qu9J3yc@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-210408-7515@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-210408-7515@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ipfw>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 08:05:21 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D210408

smithi@nimnet.asn.au changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |smithi@nimnet.asn.au

--- Comment #1 from smithi@nimnet.asn.au ---
>From ipfw(8), second last paragraph:

"    Due to the architecture of libalias(3), ipfw nat is not compatible with
     the TCP segmentation offloading (TSO).  Thus, to reliably nat your net-
     work traffic, please disable TSO on your NICs using ifconfig(8)."

I don't know about RXCSUM & TXCSUM in this context, but NAT is only for
IPv4 - make sure your NAT rules only apply to ipv4 packets specifically -
 and you certainly need to turn TSO4 off when using either kernel NAT
 or natd(8), both of which use libalias(3).

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=