Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2017 18:50:39 -0700 From: bob prohaska <fbsd@www.zefox.net> To: ticso@cicely.de Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn: E175003: Attempt to fetch capability 'depth' resulted in 'yes' Message-ID: <20170405015039.GB88592@www.zefox.net> In-Reply-To: <20170405011246.GL16909@cicely7.cicely.de> References: <20170310184210.GA38002@www.zefox.net> <26fa7189-fd35-cdb4-ccfc-5ba623be9e59@zyxst.net> <e5d21dab-0ebb-e48d-effe-ba3b855c9d3b@bsd.com.br> <20170404160947.GA82658@www.zefox.net> <DD18F4F3-5123-43B2-BBE2-E7D52B340878@dsl-only.net> <20170404223954.GK16909@cicely7.cicely.de> <20170405003742.GA88592@www.zefox.net> <20170405011246.GL16909@cicely7.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 03:12:48AM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote: > > Yes - there is some idle timeout somewhere with the official FreeBSD > svn servers, which is too short for those super high write times with > SD cards. > But annoyingly svn not just terminates instead of reconnecting - it > leaves the workdirectory in an unclean state requiring an svn cleanup > rung, which by itself can be ultra slow on SD cards. > Really not funny at all for /usr/ports. Agreed entirely. That's what motivated me to buy Sandisk Extreme USB 3.0 flash drives. As an aside, I think using the very same grade of microSD cards (not outrageously expensive) solved, or mostly solved, the problem when using a single large filesystem on one microSD with no usb drives at all. That particular system is disturbed as little as possible, so its subversion performance isn't well-explored. bob prohaska
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170405015039.GB88592>