Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 21:26:53 -0500 From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Standards <freebsd-standards@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-doc@freebsd.org" <freebsd-doc@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: c99 project Message-ID: <CAF6rxgnAcD8az2Uy%2BjyFAyRD7a%2BVDkh9XXLhsrOD=Ud9E6kTUw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130205103509.GB28045@saturn> References: <CAF6rxg=78ze7nM6g9LcX8A52Nd8p2NWbrMoArzSEPnyp-SrHhw@mail.gmail.com> <20130205103509.GB28045@saturn>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 2013-02-04 21:48, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com> wrote: >> Is the following page still useful? >> Would there be any objection to me removing it? >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html > > I think this is useful until we have full C99 support in at least one > compiler toolchain. To the best of my knowledge this is not entirely > true for either GCC or LLVM. > > So we should keep the page alive, until the project is done or canceled. Reviving an old thread here: The C99 compliance page was last updated in 2011 and it currently shows a large amount of outdated information. I see this page being used in many discussion forums, on IRC, etc. to show FreeBSD in a negative light. We need to either (A) move this to the wiki (b) update it on a routine basis or (c) delete it. Can I please have a volunteer go through the page and tell me what to change? I am more than happy to act as the 'doc proxy' but someone needs to commit to monitoring changes. -- Eitan Adler
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF6rxgnAcD8az2Uy%2BjyFAyRD7a%2BVDkh9XXLhsrOD=Ud9E6kTUw>