From owner-freebsd-scsi Fri Feb 20 23:01:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA06823 for freebsd-scsi-outgoing; Fri, 20 Feb 1998 23:01:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from narnia.plutotech.com (narnia.plutotech.com [206.168.67.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA06816 for ; Fri, 20 Feb 1998 23:00:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com) Received: (from gibbs@localhost) by narnia.plutotech.com (8.8.8/8.7.3) id XAA28088; Fri, 20 Feb 1998 23:58:01 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 20 Feb 1998 23:58:01 -0700 (MST) From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Message-Id: <199802210658.XAA28088@narnia.plutotech.com> To: Tom cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: very slow scsi performance Newsgroups: pluto.freebsd.scsi In-Reply-To: User-Agent: tin/pre-1.4-971204 (UNIX) (FreeBSD/3.0-CURRENT (i386)) Sender: owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In article you wrote: > > On Wed, 18 Feb 1998, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > >> I'm working on finishing up this 7890 support so that I can release an >> updated CAM snapshot. Once that happens, you might want to try CAM >> and see if it addresses this problem. > > But CAM means current. Downgrading production servers to current is not > an option. CAM works for wcarchive and many of Satoshi's "production" systems. It is possible to port CAM to 2.2 as well since that is how wcarchive is using it. -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message