Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 16:51:49 +0400 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> To: "Michael Nottebrock" <lofi@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org, Michael Johnson <ahze@freebsd.org>, multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: plan for ffmpeg-devel Message-ID: <cb5206420704030551w7935f2bhfce20dd3a38c1f1a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200704031020.51852.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <b2203fed0704020837u3f4e6d6av658175c060765916@mail.gmail.com> <cb5206420704030032o19bf1abfrb7dc13b01219fc9a@mail.gmail.com> <200704031020.51852.lofi@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/3/07, Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Tuesday, 3. April 2007, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > > On 4/2/07, Michael Johnson <ahze@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > I want to move ffmpeg-devel -> ffmpeg and we need testers. > > > not just to make sure things build but to assure movies play, > > > mp3's still play, etc... Please test new ffmpeg-devel > > > > If it's all the same to you, please revert to traditional > > 0.4.9.*.20070331 when moving to ffmpeg. > > AFAIK ffmpeg gave up the notion of a release version for ffmpeg (the transcode > configure script needs to be patched to deal with this, too, IIRC it looks > for FFMPEG_VERSION in the avcodec header which doesn't exist anymore). At least portage uses the old versioning. Debian, pkgsrc and openbsd ports all use different numbers. I guess it's up to you...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cb5206420704030551w7935f2bhfce20dd3a38c1f1a>