Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 May 1999 14:49:12 -0400
From:      Nathan Dorfman <nathan@rtfm.net>
To:        Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Cc:        unknown@riverstyx.net, spork <spork@super-g.com>, James Howard <howardjp@wam.umd.edu>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Free VMWare and open BIOS!
Message-ID:  <19990527144911.A8231@rtfm.net>
In-Reply-To: <4.2.0.37.19990527095144.00b7a320@localhost>; from Brett Glass on Thu, May 27, 1999 at 09:55:29AM -0600
References:  <4.2.0.37.19990520145111.044f4ab0@localhost> <4.2.0.37.19990519171814.045d9c80@localhost> <Pine.LNX.4.04.9905201222220.9897-100000@hades.riverstyx.ne <4.2.0.37.19990520145111.044f4ab0@localhost> <19990526122522.A26225@rtfm.net> <4.2.0.37.19990527095144.00b7a320@localhost>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 27, 1999 at 09:55:29AM -0600, Brett Glass wrote:
> At 12:25 PM 5/26/99 -0400, Nathan Dorfman wrote:
> 
>  >How do you figure? They're not giving away what you're trying to sell.
> >They're giving away their own code. 
> 
> Not so. It's a classic predatory pricing tactic: destroy the market for
> a business's product. 
> 
> Note also that those who publish under the GPL are not "giving away" 
> their code; commercial developers can't incorporate it. Rather, they're 
> giving free use of it to those developers' CUSTOMERS, which kills the
> market, while locking the developers themselves out. The EXPRESS purpose 
> of this tactic is to kill commercial developers.

Why should the commercial developer be automagically entitled to
use the free software's code? The free software was not based on
the commercial code, it is original code.

That's like saying that the express purpose of Linux is to take away
market from AT&T -- they create more or less clone of the Unix kernel
and license it under the GPL, which doesn't allow AT&T to use the
Linux source in their product. Why is this unfair? AT&T never let
Linux use their proprietary source code. What about FreeBSD? AT&T
could have used FreeBSD code in their commercial product. How does this
make anything more fair? Unless of course, you're AT&T and are worried
about some competition. Hmm...

> --Brett Glass

-- 
Nathan Dorfman <nathan@rtfm.net>         The statements and opinions in my
Unix Admin @ Frontline Communications    public posts are mine, not FCC's.
"The light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an approaching
train." --/usr/games/fortune


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990527144911.A8231>