Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:52:20 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Current problem reports assigned to ports@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID:  <4E936914.40001@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgkdDRPZsibwnpd8kmLP2pGn44PvLk1bBu364wq5ZbPX-g@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201110101108.p9AB8Zqv033658@freefall.freebsd.org> <4E9345E8.9010506@FreeBSD.org> <CAF6rxgkdDRPZsibwnpd8kmLP2pGn44PvLk1bBu364wq5ZbPX-g@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/10/2011 14:48, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> It's been quite a few weeks that this empty/pointless message has been
>> sent to the list, what needs to happen to make it stop?
> 
> Assign bugs to ports@ - then it won't be empty anymore.

There is already freebsd-ports-bugs, and there is already a report
generated for that. A report for ports@ is worse than useless.



-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E936914.40001>