Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:30:20 -0500
From:      Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com>
To:        "Mike." <the.lists@mgm51.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: qmail or postfix?
Message-ID:  <AANLkTikexqLAFFbuK7Px0vKSyG24rw2415UROJYhOUK1@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com>
References:  <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mike. <the.lists@mgm51.com> wrote:

> On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote:
>
> |On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100
> |Alessandro Baggi <alessandro.baggi@gmail.com> articulated:
> |
> |> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix?
> |
> |"qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires
> |numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable servicable
> standards.
> |
> |"Postfix" is actively maintained and is constantly being upgraded by
> |its author. Its mail forum is robust and Postfix has outstanding
> |documentation; perhaps the best of any software available in the FOSS
> |world.
>  =============
>
>
> It is a good thing I read all the replies before I posted mine, as your
> reply is almost word-for-word identical to what I was going to say.  :)


Postfix hands down is better, recent, well maintained and excellently
documented



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikexqLAFFbuK7Px0vKSyG24rw2415UROJYhOUK1>