Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:30:20 -0500 From: Outback Dingo <outbackdingo@gmail.com> To: "Mike." <the.lists@mgm51.com> Cc: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? Message-ID: <AANLkTikexqLAFFbuK7Px0vKSyG24rw2415UROJYhOUK1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mike. <the.lists@mgm51.com> wrote: > On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote: > > |On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100 > |Alessandro Baggi <alessandro.baggi@gmail.com> articulated: > | > |> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix? > | > |"qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires > |numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable servicable > standards. > | > |"Postfix" is actively maintained and is constantly being upgraded by > |its author. Its mail forum is robust and Postfix has outstanding > |documentation; perhaps the best of any software available in the FOSS > |world. > ============= > > > It is a good thing I read all the replies before I posted mine, as your > reply is almost word-for-word identical to what I was going to say. :) Postfix hands down is better, recent, well maintained and excellently documented
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikexqLAFFbuK7Px0vKSyG24rw2415UROJYhOUK1>