From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 1 18:30:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3C01065772 for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA778FC1A for ; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 18:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so3460875ewy.13 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:30:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=m1/hi2v7mdF8i94CbdmcEPQpuFIfjktJUHyOr3ZJbFU=; b=Ns+K7gBHzWt60ceCrCreHBrHA4ypgD7ewKs2mvPS8tfeRsMbOzIcZJTQKCSkVaPM5i /tRbxQmypDCWjiyI1O0y62/XkwST6An2od7A/SuOEzVMs/5/PTmDDt0lOt13BEoYol7b UMjyRTTLFpEy4emciZeBmavfGinc1rNDKE9TU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=GD/Eec8QFLg4kTM6qTFJ7CYN6qceZiFfMMp59qxQEqJtTxh75wH/bTTD1i7u34Yt66 rbbami1xOLKaH8FfkrDmsjFfC22RIoosa4J89+bnynBbHwFByxg/4V9guFRQEq20ryQ9 pojjSe3ow4ZRTNHrKmS/bMAvzKX85Sjjqu+ic= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.119.14 with SMTP id m14mr298700eeh.24.1296585020298; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 10:30:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.48.75 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:30:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <20110201102301.2ae55810@scorpio> <201102011326580606.004CE418@sentry.24cl.com> Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:30:20 -0500 Message-ID: From: Outback Dingo To: "Mike." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 18:30:34 -0000 On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Mike. wrote: > On 2/1/2011 at 10:23 AM Jerry wrote: > > |On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 15:32:26 +0100 > |Alessandro Baggi articulated: > | > |> Hi list. Who is better, qmail or postfix? > | > |"qmail" is not actively supported by its developer. It requires > |numerous patches, etc to bring it up to acceptable servicable > standards. > | > |"Postfix" is actively maintained and is constantly being upgraded by > |its author. Its mail forum is robust and Postfix has outstanding > |documentation; perhaps the best of any software available in the FOSS > |world. > ============= > > > It is a good thing I read all the replies before I posted mine, as your > reply is almost word-for-word identical to what I was going to say. :) Postfix hands down is better, recent, well maintained and excellently documented