Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 20:17:32 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 239743] Mk/bsd.port.mk: don't switch to ld.bfd on powerpc64 with clang Message-ID: <bug-239743-7788-9IVAiHweHK@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-239743-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-239743-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D239743 --- Comment #10 from Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Piotr Kubaj from comment #9) Sure, but the ports tree is not just powerpc64 and some ports are compiled = with gcc even on amd64 or i386 Does this patch work? %%% LDFLAGS+=3D -fuse-ld=3Dbfd BINARY_ALIAS+=3D ld=3D${LD} . if !defined(USE_BINUTILS) -. if exists(/usr/bin/ld.bfd) +. if exists(/usr/bin/ld.bfd) && (${ARCH} !=3D powerpc64 || ${OSVERSION}= < 1300038) LD=3D /usr/bin/ld.bfd CONFIGURE_ENV+=3D LD=3D${LD} MAKE_ENV+=3D LD=3D${LD} . else +BINARY_ALIAS+=3D ld.bfd=3D${LOCALBASE}/bin/ld.bfd USE_BINUTILS=3D yes . endif . endif %%% The first patch you proposed ( https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D206395 ) was breaking= ports on amd64 / i386 / aarch64 btw. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-239743-7788-9IVAiHweHK>