From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 30 21:38:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF3616A4CE; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 21:38:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BF343D31; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 21:38:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2V5cRNX007788; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:38:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Robert Watson From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:00:05 CDT." Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 07:38:27 +0200 Message-ID: <7787.1080711507@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where should devctl notifications be sent from? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 05:38:29 -0000 In message , Robe rt Watson writes: >On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Nik Clayton wrote: >What I'd like to see happen is the notion of "subsystem" or "class" be >introduced to the devctl namespace. [...] A well thought out and presented plan. I agree. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.