From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 18 15:07:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537C716A4CE for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:07:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020E143D6A for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:07:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sdrhodus@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 77so145888rnl for ; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 08:07:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.126.73 with SMTP id y73mr403166rnc; Wed, 18 Aug 2004 08:07:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:07:24 -0400 From: David Rhodus To: Bosko Milekic In-Reply-To: <20040818144251.GA22971@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040818144251.GA22971@freefall.freebsd.org> cc: current@freebsd.org cc: chris@behanna.org cc: drhodus@machdep.com cc: Roman Kurakin Subject: Re: Public Access to Perforce? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: drhodus@machdep.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:07:29 -0000 On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 14:42:51 +0000, Bosko Milekic wrote: > When are you and some of your DragonFly minions going to stop spreading > this garbage? This conversation has nothing to do with DragonFly Bosko and you damn well know it. The thread is about a method in which the perforce development trees can be opened up for the public. > If you want to talk about open-source, why don't you divert the attention > to the frankly cowardly behavior going on pertaining to parts of the > DragonFly source tree instead? Whereas DragonFly has appropriated a > significant amount of FreeBSD code, only to ammend the lisencing to its > own network code to include the advertising clause (removed officially > from the BSDL a while ago now), and for what? Only to make it difficult for > FreeBSD to take some of the code back. Anyway this has nothing to do with the current thread of discussion Bosko. The networking code in DragonFly has been developed with the intention of some commercial reasoning in mind for some of the developers who have worked on it. This is only to further improve the ongoing development work in DragonFly. The advertising clause sun-sets in a year anyway and anyone can still download the DragonFly source and do what ever with it , so your point is moot. > So if you want to talk about 'shitty open-source > practises,' I'd argue that yours are much more significant than ours. Again this was not the point of the conversation. Why not toss in some more point less items like GPL, LGPL, etc... -- -David Steven David Rhodus