Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Dec 2000 23:27:07 -0800
From:      David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG>
To:        Stephen McKay <mckay@thehub.com.au>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Is compatibility for old aout binaries broken?
Message-ID:  <20001218232706.A90914@hub.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200012190508.eBJ58Po10495@dungeon.home>; from mckay@thehub.com.au on Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:08:25PM %2B1000
References:  <20001216161756.A6370@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com> <200012171658.eBHGwGW24109@dungeon.home> <20001217135431.C9721@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com> <200012180641.eBI6fH607564@dungeon.home> <20001218014656.A17483@cae88-102-101.sc.rr.com> <200012181500.eBIF0S612182@dungeon.home> <20001218100315.A67679@dragon.nuxi.com> <200012190508.eBJ58Po10495@dungeon.home>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:08:25PM +1000, Stephen McKay wrote:
> Our current problem is that an older ld.so has somehow been made part
> of compat22.  I'm now attempting to determine whether the ld.so on
> the 3.2 CD contains the fix in rev 1.57 of rtld-aout/rtld.c, and if
> so I'll just commit it in the compat22 directory.

Please delay committing -- since it is UUENCODED, it is a bit repo bloat
if we don't get it right.  It doesn't seem right to put 3.x bits into the
compat22 dist.  By definition they are the wrong bits.  My internet
connection is down for the past day, and I only have limited connectivity
right now.   But I would like to look into this before anything is
committed.

- 
-- David    (obrien@FreeBSD.org)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001218232706.A90914>