Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:51:17 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@hotjobs.com> Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Why doscmd isn't builded by default? Message-ID: <199901102051.NAA13011@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 07 Jan 1999 13:40:04 EST." <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901071339510.37756-100000@bright.fx.genx.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901071339510.37756-100000@bright.fx.genx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.05.9901071339510.37756-100000@bright.fx.genx.net> Alfred Perlstein writes: : > I'm looking into -CURRENT src/usr.bin/Makefile and there isn't any : > information about doscmd so it isn't builded by default. : > Is there any reason not to build doscmd by default? : : It requires X. It doesn't require X. It will use X if it is present, however. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901102051.NAA13011>