From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sun Aug 20 14:20:38 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id OAA19996
          for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 20 Aug 1995 14:20:38 -0700
Received: from localhost.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with SMTP id OAA19990
          for <hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 20 Aug 1995 14:20:35 -0700
Message-Id: <199508202120.OAA19990@freefall.FreeBSD.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.FreeBSD.org: Host localhost.cdrom.com didn't use HELO protocol
To: hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org
Subject: Clock interrupts during probes?
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 1995 14:20:34 -0700
From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freefall.FreeBSD.org>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

What are the issues involved in allowing clock interrupts during
probes?  The PCI code already does this so I would think it possible
to do it for the others.  It would certainly make the job of having 
the SCSI code perform the proper delays between retries easier.  It
would also be the first step in getting rid of the ugly DELAY()'s in 
driver code.
__
Justin T. Gibbs
===========================================
  Software Developer - Walnut Creek CDROM
  FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations
===========================================