Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:48:28 -0700
From:      Charles Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
To:        john.haraden@yahoo.com
Cc:        "questions@freebsd.org" <questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: pkg
Message-ID:  <B9B9D28A-11DC-44EB-B87C-6FC3E94999C2@mac.com>
In-Reply-To: <F28EE24B-85F1-4164-A304-E2F5A288E169@yahoo.com>
References:  <F28EE24B-85F1-4164-A304-E2F5A288E169@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 22, 2015, at 1:12 PM, john.haraden--- via freebsd-questions =
<freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote:
> (1). I have a work station with two Xeon processors.
> (2) I have installed FreeBSD 10.1
> (3). I have no internet connection.
> (4)   When I tried to use pkg to make my system fully functional, the =
system declared pkg was not in the base system, I would need to fetch it =
over the Internet.  That is impossible since I do not have internet =
capability.

You get a fully functioning FreeBSD system from the .iso images.  If you =
want to install external / third-party software, then using ports or pkg =
via the Internet is a good solution, but it is not the only option.

> (5)  Is there some other way for me to get pkg?

Sure.  You can download pkg and the packages you want to have it install =
onto
a USB drive, burn them to a CD/DVD, etc.  Note that the FreeBSD project
provides a larger image with some common packages included as a DVD =
image, ie:

   FreeBSD-10.1-RELEASE-amd64-dvd1.iso

> (6)   Why was something as basic as pkg not included in the base =
system?

Packages and ports are not part of the base system by definition.

I've got production firewalls based upon FreeBSD still running at =
clients which
never needed or had any additional third-party software installed on =
them,
for example....

> After all, the system is supposed to be self-contained?

It is.  FreeBSD is self-hosting and can be bootstrapped from source via
the included compiler toolchain.

> (7) I tried to install my old version 5.3, but the hardware would not =
accept it.

Good.  You'd be missing a decade worth of security fixes, if nothing =
else.

> (8)   Do I have any alternative to discarding the new hardware and =
FreeBSD?

You have many alternatives, but feel free to select the most =
melodramatic option if doing so pleases you.

Regards,
--=20
-Chuck




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B9B9D28A-11DC-44EB-B87C-6FC3E94999C2>