From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 20 20:00:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D668F16A400 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9862543D70 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:00:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3KK0Zn2088896 for ; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:00:35 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k3KK0Zxk088895; Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:00:35 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:00:35 GMT Message-Id: <200604202000.k3KK0Zxk088895@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org From: Maxim Konovalov Cc: Subject: Re: kern/63724 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Maxim Konovalov List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:00:39 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/63724; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Maxim Konovalov To: akruijff@dds.nl Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/63724 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:56:54 +0400 (MSD) On Sun, 16 Apr 2006, 00:42+0200, Alex de Kruijff wrote: > Maxim, > > On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 01:05:01AM +0400, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > ipfw rule #31600 counters show packets just do not reach it and all > > subsequent rules. > > Its was not a problem with the ruleset. I used the same ruleset on 4.9 > as on 5.2. The ruleset also worked when I replaced the queues with > pipes. I failed to report that one needs to run > 'net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass=0'. > > > We need the whole ipfw ruleset. > > I beleave I tested this test case. Did these rules work for you under > 5.2 or 5.x? If so you can just close it. > > As for the counters I could have simply types 'ipfw z; ipfw sh'. > > Did the test case worked fine for you? Under 5.2? > > > Can you check the problem persists in recent FreeBSD releases? > > It works under 6.x. (both 6.0 as 6.1) I don't have a box with 5.x. Neither do I. -- Maxim Konovalov