Date: 25 Jul 2002 18:03:53 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Cyrille Lefevre <cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net> Cc: Mark Valentine <mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk>, "Brian F. Feldman" <green@FreeBSD.ORG>, Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de>, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Scripting languages (was: Re: Package system flaws?) Message-ID: <xzpheinokuu.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020724135321.GB4475@gits.dyndns.org> References: <200207231916.g6NJGTj47459@green.bikeshed.org> <200207232048.g6NKmHQe028433@dotar.thuvia.org> <20020724135321.GB4475@gits.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Cyrille Lefevre <cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net> writes: > well, I have a very low knowledge about zsh, but it has many features > (maybe too much, IMHO) such as associative arrays and builtin dynamic > loading... zsh is mostly a ksh clone. It can also emulate sh, csh and bash (and even understands csh scripting syntax), but it's possibly not a good enough sh clone to replace ash. At leat 3.x wasn't - I haven't checked the docs lately, so it's possible that 4.x is better. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpheinokuu.fsf>