Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 09:25:39 +1030 (CST) From: Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com> Cc: Brian Handy <handy@lambic.physics.montana.edu>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: MASTER_SITE_(AFTERSTEP|WINDOWMAKER)? Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.05.9902080924380.4055-100000@bragg> In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.96.990207103153.16974H-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote: > > I was rooting for some extra master sites for a wm app earlier, and I got > > to poking through the bsd.port.mk files...and I came up with this. We've > > got MASTER_SITE_GNOME, so there seems to be precedence for something like > > this, and there's sure enough AS and WM apps running around the tree. So > > does this seem like a reasonable thing to do? > > I second this patch. How many things do we actually have in the tree that are on these sites? My experience with WM/AS apps is that they tend to be located all over the place. Kris ----- (ASP) Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) announced today that the release of its productivity suite, Office 2000, will be delayed until the first quarter of 1901. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.05.9902080924380.4055-100000>