Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 06 Mar 2002 14:46:41 +0000
From:      Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
To:        Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Sorting and Matching options for ls(1)
Message-ID:  <3C862BD1.3020908@softweyr.com>
References:  <4.3.2.7.2.20020306201110.00c125b0@gid.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bob Bishop wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> At 13:57 06/03/02 +0000, Wes Peters wrote:
> 
>> At the request of several FreeBSD users, I have developed the following
>> two options for ls(1): [etc]
> 
> 
> I have given up flaming for Lent, so I have no opinion about the worth 
> of the proposal :-) :-) However, if you are going to do it, what about
> 
>                 b       sort by number of blocks allocated (cf ls -s)
> 
>                 i       sort by inode number (cf ls -i)

Excellent suggestions.  This was such a simple request, I've just finished
adding them.  I'll update the diff in a few minutes.  Thanks!

-- 
             "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters                                                         Softweyr LLC
wes@softweyr.com                                           http://softweyr.com/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C862BD1.3020908>