From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul  2 16:40:16 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C763C1065673;
	Mon,  2 Jul 2012 16:40:16 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4A98FC17;
	Mon,  2 Jul 2012 16:40:16 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4FF1CEEF.2080301@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 12:40:15 -0400
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:13.0) Gecko/20120626 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sbruno@freebsd.org
References: <1341246148.3342.1.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <1341246148.3342.1.camel@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-acpi <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>, Sean Bruno <seanbru@yahoo-inc.com>
Subject: Re: acpi patches in gnats that are rotting
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 16:40:16 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2012-07-02 12:22:28 -0400, Sean Bruno wrote:
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=121504

This is no longer relevant after r214390:

http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=214390

> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135349

If my memory serves, I objected it at the time.  I don't really
remember exactly why, though.  I *think* my objection was something
along the line of "not safe without mem range check and header
validation".

Jung-uk Kim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk/xzu8ACgkQmlay1b9qnVPyPQCgv/fXkWZFmRc0og9YzOjFQBdL
9woAoJnP/vzFfPmEoYqpjaLoWu/w0SZM
=4qEc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----