From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 17:48:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27451065670 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:48:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A379B8FC2E for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:48:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m31HjwXA090245; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 11:45:58 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:46:45 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20080401.114645.-432836986.imp@bsdimp.com> To: ticso@cicely.de, ticso@cicely12.cicely.de From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20080331174613.GG15954@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <47F10137.5070104@quickdekay.net> <20080331174613.GG15954@cicely12.cicely.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Porting FreeBSD to Atmel at91sam9263 X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:48:46 -0000 In message: <20080331174613.GG15954@cicely12.cicely.de> Bernd Walter writes: : On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 05:20:23PM +0200, K Staring wrote: : > Hi, : > : > I'm trying to get FreeBSD to boot from an Atmel 9263 based board. : > I suppose the porting process isn't that much trouble, as the Atmel 9261 : > seems to be supported. The bootloader used is u-boot. : : We don't support the 9261, we only support the RM9200. : There are many differences to consider, for example the ethernet and : MCI controller are different between the RM9200 and the SAM9. : But also many clock related things need to be taken care of. : So without setting the MCK correctly I assume your DBGU bps rate will : be wrong. The SAM9's also use a slightly newer core that needs support merged from the p4 tree. This is also a variation of stuff needed for the orion port that's coming soon. Stay tuned. Warner