Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:27:04 +1100 From: Gregory Bond <gnb@itga.com.au> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -STABLE was stable for long time (Re: FreeBSD: Server or Desktop OS?) Message-ID: <200211172327.KAA11042@lightning.itga.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 17 Nov 2002 23:52:08 %2B0100.
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> You have chosen to maintain systems which stretch FreeBSD to its limits > and uncover bugs lurking in the code. This is great. But you cannot do > so on the one hand and refuse to face the administrative work on the > other hand. And this is not a FreeBSD problem either - if you are doing stressful or mission-critical things, then you have to put more effort into admin and making sure you get the right OS environment, whether you are running FreeBSD or Solaris or whatever. For example, if you had Solaris boxes in the same job, you wouldn't just willy-nilly add Solaris patches without trying them on a test box.... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200211172327.KAA11042>