From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 00:09:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4621065804; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1708FC12; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:09:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DDEAFC1FE; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:09:28 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:09:27 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20090128202556.GA30226@haydn.nognu.de> <200901281523.33379.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20090129010926.GA6652@haydn.nognu.de> In-Reply-To: <20090129010926.GA6652@haydn.nognu.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901311509.28014.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, Frank Steinborn Subject: Re: Problem with ezjail: Manually restarted jails don't come up again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:09:29 -0000 On Wednesday 28 January 2009 16:09:26 Frank Steinborn wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 03:23:33PM -0900, Mel wrote: > > On Wednesday 28 January 2009 12:24:31 Frank Steinborn wrote: > > > 37948 p3 TJ 0:00.01 -su -c /bin/sh -c ^I"/usr/local/bin/mlnet ^I > > > ^I ^I>> /dev/null 2>&1 &" (zsh) > > > > ^^^ > > Why is zsh shell involved? > > This was it. I should not have used the root-account inside the jails > with zsh. I now use the toor account on zsh and put the shell of root > back to csh everywhere. > > However, I don't understand why zsh is invoked, since all rc.d-scripts > have shebang lines telling them to use /bin/sh? I'm a bit confused, > maybe can someone give a bit light on this... su invokes $SHELL of the target user, from su(8): By default, the environment is unmodified with the exception of USER, HOME, and SHELL. HOME and SHELL are set to the target login's default values. USER is set to the target login, unless the target login has a user ID of 0, in which case it is unmodified. The invoked shell is the one belonging to the target login. This is the traditional behavior of su. So: su root -c /bin/sh expands to ${SHELL} /bin/sh -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 00:10:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0B0106567B for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657AF8FC0C for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C86509C7 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:10:04 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from nyi.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nyi.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HkSXJ4TElKUF for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:10:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 90EB8509BF; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:10:02 +0000 (GMT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20090201001002.90EB8509BF@nyi.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:10:02 +0000 (GMT) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2009-01-11 - 2009-01-31 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:10:05 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 00:31:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953191065735; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:31:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4668FC13; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:31:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n110Vb8o028389; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:31:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n110Vaoc028386; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:31:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:31:36 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Keith Seyffarth In-Reply-To: <20090131231843.655FCA6D67@maxine.cjones.org> Message-ID: References: <20090128212906.35F33A6B41@maxine.cjones.org> <20090128225313.6097f792@baby-jane.lamaiziere.net> <20090131213917.175A8A6CFB@maxine.cjones.org> <20090131231843.655FCA6D67@maxine.cjones.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:31:37 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Noland Subject: xorg input ignored until mouse is moved (was Re: issues with X not loading) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:31:39 -0000 On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Keith Seyffarth wrote: >>> I also tried adding >>> AllowEmptyInput "off" >>> in xorg.conf, but that gives an error when starting X that >>> AllowEmptyInput is not valid. >> >> In section ServerLayout, add >> >> Option "AllowEmptyInput" "Off" > > Thakns. This worked. I had the syntax incorrect. however, I thought > this wasn't supposed to be necessar after the updates to hal on the > 27th? I hadn't tested it since then, but did just now. Removing keyboard and mouse entries and AllowEmptyInput and AutoAddDevices entries in ServerLayout did work... for a few seconds. Then it went back to keyboard input or mouse clicks ignored until the mouse is moved. That includes ctrl-alt-backspace. This is with hal-0.5.11_14 and moused enabled, tested on two different systems. Both have a USB and PS/2 mouse. So I'm sticking with explicitly declaring keyboard and mouse and AutoAddDevices Off for now. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 00:38:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24CFD10657C0; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E50A8FC14; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:38:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1LTQMS-0007kP-E3>; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:38:56 +0100 Received: from e178054066.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.54.66] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1LTQMS-00026W-8u>; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:38:56 +0100 Message-ID: <4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:39:03 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090131) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel References: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <200901301430.07087.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200901301430.07087.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.54.66 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:38:59 -0000 Mel wrote: > On Friday 30 January 2009 13:19:41 O. Hartmann wrote: > >> After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4 >> and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now >> firefox3 still doesn't work properly and hits me when starting with this >> error message: >> >> Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". >> >> Then firefox3 freezes forever, showing something like the background or >> pixel remnants of windows/picograms moving over its window. >> > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-October/039134.html > > Well, that doesn't help very much. As R. Noland wrote, the error coming up isn't of any harm. I still have Firefox3 not working on a FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT/AMD64 UP box, running the most recent FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT and having now recompiled three time EVERYTHING, Firefox3 inclusive. Firefox3 is still stuck when it comes to pulldown menus or requester for download destination, eating up 100% CPU time and slowing down the box incredible. I pretty sure I have all the stuff of the X11 suite in the right place and the right revision number, as I said, I recompiled everything three times and I did several attempts upgrading the whole Xorg since sunday last week. Also a deletion of the ports has been performed and then reinstalled. I can not asure that there is any zomby-library out there disturbing the build-process, but I doubt this. I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects. Interestingly, the first three entries show up something missing - therefore I deinstalled Firefox and rebuild the browser after an additional rebuild of libxcb (via portupgrade -rf). Previously, all Xorg stuff has been rebuild and by the numbers it seems to be up to date. I double checked if /usr/local/lib/firefox3 has been completely removed and for the user's stuff, I deleted the entire ~/.mozilla folder and started Firefox3 from scratch - everytime with the same result. Firefox3 did not show these symptomes on a FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE/AMD64 SMP box, also with most recent sources and undergone the same three time recompilation of everything procedure. Unlucklily, I do not have another UP box running FreeBSD 8.0/amd64 for double check this behaviour. Bevor filing a PR, I would like to ask the list ... Thanks in advance, Oliver thor# ldd firefox-bin firefox-bin: libxul.so => not found (0x0) libmozjs.so => not found (0x0) libxpcom.so => not found (0x0) libplds4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 (0x80063e000) libplc4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplc4.so.1 (0x80076f000) libnspr4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libnspr4.so.1 (0x8008a1000) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x8009d9000) libatk-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 (0x800e92000) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (0x800fb1000) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (0x80114d000) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (0x801267000) libgio-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0 (0x801372000) libXext.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x8014de000) libXrender.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 (0x8015ef000) libXinerama.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1 (0x8016f8000) libXi.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6 (0x8017fa000) libXrandr.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2 (0x801903000) libXcursor.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1 (0x801a0a000) libXcomposite.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXcomposite.so.1 (0x801b14000) libXdamage.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libXdamage.so.1 (0x801c17000) libcairo.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libcairo.so.2 (0x801d19000) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (0x801e96000) libpango-1.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 (0x801fc3000) libfreetype.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 (0x80210a000) libz.so.4 => /lib/libz.so.4 (0x802287000) libfontconfig.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 (0x80239b000) libgmodule-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 (0x8024ca000) libX11.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x8025cd000) libXfixes.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libXfixes.so.3 (0x8027cb000) libgobject-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 (0x8028d0000) libglib-2.0.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 (0x802a12000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x802bcb000) libiconv.so.3 => /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 (0x802cea000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x802ecd000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8030d6000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x8031e3000) libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x8032fb000) libintl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.8 (0x803525000) libxcb.so.2 => /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2 (0x80362e000) libXdmcp.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x803748000) librpcsvc.so.4 => /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.4 (0x80384d000) libXau.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 (0x803956000) libpixman-1.so.9 => /usr/local/lib/libpixman-1.so.9 (0x803a59000) libglitz.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libglitz.so.1 (0x803b91000) libpng.so.5 => /usr/local/lib/libpng.so.5 (0x803cba000) libxcb-render-util.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libxcb-render-util.so.0 (0x803de1000) libxcb-render.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libxcb-render.so.0 (0x803ee4000) libexpat.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6 (0x803fec000) libicui18n.so.38 => /usr/local/lib/libicui18n.so.38 (0x80410f000) libpcre.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.0 (0x804366000) libicuuc.so.38 => /usr/local/lib/libicuuc.so.38 (0x804493000) libicudata.so.38 => /usr/local/lib/libicudata.so.38 (0x8046c4000) --- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 00:53:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707801065712; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:53:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA468FC18; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 00:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n110rQcB028501; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:53:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n110rQai028498; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:53:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:53:26 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Keith Seyffarth In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20090128212906.35F33A6B41@maxine.cjones.org> <20090128225313.6097f792@baby-jane.lamaiziere.net> <20090131213917.175A8A6CFB@maxine.cjones.org> <20090131231843.655FCA6D67@maxine.cjones.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:53:26 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Noland Subject: Re: xorg input ignored until mouse is moved (was Re: issues with X not loading) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:53:28 -0000 On Sat, 31 Jan 2009, Warren Block wrote: > > So I'm sticking with explicitly declaring keyboard and mouse and > AutoAddDevices Off for now. Interestingly, the InputDevice mouse and keyboard entries and the corresponding entries in ServerLayout are unnecessary. Just Options "AutoAddDevices" "Off" in ServerLayout. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 02:19:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 689431065708 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 02:19:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from William@futurecis.com) Received: from mail1.futurecis.com (static-72-66-123-22.washdc.fios.verizon.net [72.66.123.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F988FC0A for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 02:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from William@futurecis.com) Received: (qmail 929 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2009 02:20:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [10.0.0.100]) ([10.0.0.100]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.futurecis.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 1 Feb 2009 02:20:40 -0000 Message-ID: <498506C4.6020209@futurecis.com> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:19:48 -0500 From: William Bentley User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel References: <49832523.60402@futurecis.com> <200901301442.51094.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <49839383.2090606@futurecis.com> <200901301516.46683.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200901301516.46683.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl5.8 Won't Build X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 02:19:37 -0000 I tried this as you said, to no avail. Same error. Please advise. Mel wrote: > On Friday 30 January 2009 14:55:47 William Bentley wrote: > >> No, this is a new install and there are no env vars set. I made sure >> that the env was clean anyways. >> > > As a work-around compile as: > env MAKEFILE=Makefile make build > > How this got changed, I have no idea. > > >> Mel wrote: >> >>> On Friday 30 January 2009 14:07:17 William Bentley wrote: >>> >>>> Here is the output: >>>> >>>> (cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/perl-5.8.9; /usr/bin/env LANG="" >>>> LC_ALL="" LC_COLLATE="" LC_CTYPE="" LC_MESSAGES="" LC_MONETARY="" >>>> LC_NUMERIC="" LC_TIME="" SHELL=/bin/sh NO_LINT=YES PREFIX=/usr/local >>>> LOCALBASE=/usr/local X11BASE=/usr/local MOTIFLIB="-L/usr/local/lib -lXm >>>> -lXp" LIBDIR="/usr/lib" CC="cc" CFLAGS="-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe" >>>> CXX="c++" CXXFLAGS="-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe" >>>> MANPREFIX="/usr/local" BSD_INSTALL_PROGRAM="install -s -o root -g wheel >>>> -m 555" BSD_INSTALL_SCRIPT="install -o root -g wheel -m 555" >>>> BSD_INSTALL_DATA="install -o root -g wheel -m 444" >>>> BSD_INSTALL_MAN="install -o root -g wheel -m 444" make -f makefile >>>> all) >>>> >>> Mine looks for Makefile (capital M). Did you set a MAKEFILE variable >>> somewhere, like environment variable? >>> > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 03:24:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3E11065704 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 03:24:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tonyrieser@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBE28FC0C for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 03:24:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tonyrieser@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so1036746wfg.7 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:24:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=54dNMo+1BC4PIsdc9NOlFIGILc/ywSZbVl8JT9A7xI0=; b=e7PLvKZRlJLexp8EUAMzZI2vrJWwl8fuRMLolrGR6m9QaATrLmpTwqhOgfOp5rwnim FFh0dUWQIEL03FeINZOQMFeU+iC0STSt+4tD7z4V50hgfLAlWXzrVysbtTEuYolFisL2 CgsKlJkNJxY3TWgj110czTGQZEFV1qpJE7Uuw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=qGQ7EKRmHtyMgVX14T9y4bvzqoXf8DbNQmX6pIwHsr/knb/JNCMtOWWF1CWxZYpyH2 xRLQowEDvJUZ1h2cxB3B9g3e8mWbUHag7mOrW+qqtK5+BRlm6FTtod5/dkRH/B4MzUzk cgz2J8Kecm0NuYhNmdrgklTCR5LGDLaHadLNQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.5.20 with SMTP id h20mr1205203wfi.167.1233458689313; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:24:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:24:49 -0500 Message-ID: <58a2fd890901311924s6bf36cb5w47d845d8d8090af8@mail.gmail.com> From: Antonio Rieser To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rhurlin , Glen Barber , Vulpes Velox Subject: Graphics tablet / Xorg / mouse problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:24:50 -0000 Hi, I recently installed FreeBSD 7.1 on an ACER Aspire 1680 laptop. I'm running KDE 3.5 and the most recent Xorg port with a Wacom Bamboo tablet and the wacom driver from the ports collection. I have the following problems with the tablet and mouse: 1) If I boot without the tablet plugged in, then plug it in later and restart X, the error message (EE) intel(0): [DRI] Unlocking inconsistency: Context 676684348 trying to unlock lock held by context 2 (EE) intel(0): [DRI] Locking deadlock. Already locked with context 676684348, trying to lock with context 2. is written to Xorg.0.log and kdm-bin.log so many times that it fills my /var partition and locks my system. Note that if I boot with the tablet already plugged in, this error doesn't appear, and everything works fine. I loading the driver via the line 'uwacom_load="YES" in /boot/loader.conf 2) If I remove the tablet from the computer (I've only tried it during an X session), the system panics and shuts down, whether or not I stop the wacom driver before removing the tablet. 3) If I stop the wacom driver, then start it again, I cannot simply restart X and have the tablet work. I have to reboot in order for the tablet to be recognized, even in mouse mode. 4) Occasionally the pointer refuses to stay put and drifts to the top of the screen. Controlling the pointer with the mouse becomes difficult at this point, too, since it wants to float upwards. Unfortunately, I have difficulty reproducing this reliably. Once it starts, though, it doesn't stop until I end the X session. If the problem starts and then I stop the wacom driver without restarting X, it continues anyway. 5) Xorg.0.log contains the following error (also included below): pad Wacom X driver can't grab event device, errno=1005 (I haven't honestly noticed any strange behavior on the 'pad' device, however.) Regarding 1) - and maybe 3) & 4) - my guess is that the tablet is fighting with the mouse for control of the pointer, but I don't know how to check if that's the case or how to fix it if it is. Thanks in advance for any help! All the best, Tony Rieser PS This post is a repost/summary of a recent thread posted under a less transparent subject line. I apologize for the redundancy. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 04:30:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAFB3106580D for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 04:30:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0818FC1C for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 04:30:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 9so416897ywe.13 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:30:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wuEXuxCAmUhL4hD5bOsinrZpVB2J6CX1X5s87OH3DIY=; b=XFoYiiXlaD2nhorm2cxcAlBsjCpeYJcOAu6gq0CI77s4/07d6gvpIFeaGcsEiVU19Z fdf8NNLeLkdDQIVXSuYUNs6auZ8/4FyY8PLPK/HKuCFPzdfP1VzVAXh5vOM67k9pOoXu NJ7g98JACurjmo9GLCfJ5/vWIleCdrDBF4V+o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tiQ6Cn6nxmW8u3Uywv1mOjlO5Ig2oC/VN+kjK/H/zkTYAa5YRqrVCdfLJk9Zhv5bqz 5LErWBwz7mxoYdU+ohyiN4STEsOyC+/6C82rZtm80uOggl61B+VVQ4cB3/7lfwHlpb3k VY5OnKcZYPUtuDbX+SM+2z+8zJeRsrVvIQdt4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.82.8 with SMTP id f8mr1958888agb.21.1233461292298; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:08:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <200901301430.07087.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:08:12 -0600 Message-ID: <790a9fff0901312008x71fa025na58856bde4c7a5be@mail.gmail.com> From: Scot Hetzel To: "O. Hartmann" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Mel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:30:47 -0000 On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:39 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > build-process, but I doubt this. I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary > and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects. > Interestingly, the first three entries show up something missing - > therefore I deinstalled Firefox and rebuild the browser after an > additional rebuild of libxcb (via portupgrade -rf). Previously, all Xorg > thor# ldd firefox-bin > firefox-bin: > libxul.so => not found (0x0) > libmozjs.so => not found (0x0) > libxpcom.so => not found (0x0) > libplds4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 (0x80063e000) > libplc4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplc4.so.1 (0x80076f000) When firefox3 was first added to the ports collection, I had noticed this problem with firefox3 (after using sysutils/libchk), but I didn't have this problem with the firefox 2. A look at the difference between the www/firefox and www/firefox3 Makefiles showed that firefox3 was missing this: LDFLAGS+= -Wl,-rpath,${PREFIX}/lib/${MOZ_RPATH} After adding this line to the ports Makefile, and rebuilding the port, these libraries are now showing as found in the ldd output. Scot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 04:37:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E50210657A4 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 04:37:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex-goncharov@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3B18FC1C for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 04:37:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex-goncharov@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.35]) by QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ABia1b0080ldTLk53UdsGq; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:37:52 +0000 Received: from daland.home ([24.34.211.11]) by OMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id AUdq1b0050FJTGg3QUdqns; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:37:51 +0000 Received: from algo by daland.home with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LTU5c-000Jiu-PI; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:37:48 -0500 From: Alex Goncharov To: "O. Hartmann" In-reply-to: <4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> (ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) References: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <200901301430.07087.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Message-Id: Sender: Alex Goncharov Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:37:48 -0500 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alex Goncharov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:37:52 -0000 ,--- You/O. (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:39:03 +0100) ----* | I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary | and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects. | Interestingly, the first three entries show up something missing - LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox3 ldd /usr/local/lib/firefox3/firefox-bin | head -n 5 /usr/local/lib/firefox3/firefox-bin: libxul.so => /usr/local/lib/firefox3/libxul.so (0x28087000) libmozjs.so => /usr/local/lib/firefox3/libmozjs.so (0x28e8f000) libxpcom.so => /usr/local/lib/firefox3/libxpcom.so (0x28f1f000) firefox3 sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH for you :-) | thor# ldd firefox-bin | firefox-bin: | libxul.so => not found (0x0) | libmozjs.so => not found (0x0) | libxpcom.so => not found (0x0) | libplds4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 (0x80063e000) -- Alex -- alex-goncharov@comcast.net -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 05:06:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE231065E1E; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 05:06:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2892F8FC13; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 05:06:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50DD3AFC1FE; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:06:22 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:05:50 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <200901301430.07087.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901312005.51125.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension " missing on display ":0.0". X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 05:06:35 -0000 On Saturday 31 January 2009 15:39:03 O. Hartmann wrote: > Mel wrote: > > On Friday 30 January 2009 13:19:41 O. Hartmann wrote: > >> After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4 > >> and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now > >> firefox3 still doesn't work properly and hits me when starting with this > >> error message: > >> > >> Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". > >> > >> Then firefox3 freezes forever, showing something like the background or > >> pixel remnants of windows/picograms moving over its window. > > > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-October/039134.html > > Well, that doesn't help very much. As R. Noland wrote, the error coming > up isn't of any harm. > > I still have Firefox3 not working on a FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT/AMD64 UP box, > running the most recent FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT and having now recompiled > three time EVERYTHING, Firefox3 inclusive. Firefox3 is still stuck when > it comes to pulldown menus or requester for download destination, eating > up 100% CPU time and slowing down the box incredible. I pretty sure I > have all the stuff of the X11 suite in the right place and the right > revision number, as I said, I recompiled everything three times and I > did several attempts upgrading the whole Xorg since sunday last week. You have 2 choices: - revert to known working xorg-server-1.4 (xorg 7.3) - try to debug this using the send-pr system, given the ammount of problems people are posting with this xorg-server, more datapoints are not a bad thing. As a sidenote, it would be nice if xorg-server14 port would be created till the dust has settled. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 05:20:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7A010658FE for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 05:20:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (pool-173-50-231-101.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [173.50.231.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3710A8FC17 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 05:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: by sopwith.solgatos.com (Postfix, from userid 66) id 6F8BBB652; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:10:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id DAA18347; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 03:27:38 GMT Message-Id: <200902010327.DAA18347@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:27:38 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: Unix disk utility similar to Victoria ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 05:20:39 -0000 Does anyone know of a Unix utility that can do "a scan of connected devices regardless of BIOS status" similar to Victoria ? The "BUSY" state is of particular interest. GUI not required. I tried google, no joy. http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=129263 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 06:53:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EBC51065714 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:53:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) Received: from hunter.Sisis.de (hunter.sisis.de [193.31.11.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47768FC13 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:53:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) Received: (from mail@localhost) by hunter.Sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA20877; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 07:44:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) Received: from ppp-93-104-57-150.dynamic.mnet-online.de(93.104.57.150) by hunter.Sisis.de via smap (V2.1) id xma020868; Sun, 1 Feb 09 07:43:49 +0100 Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id n116r1Sa002875; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 07:53:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to matthias.apitz@oclc.org using -f Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 07:53:01 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Mel Message-ID: <20090201065301.GA2568@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20090130154311.GA7964@rebelion.Sisis.de> <200901310814.23334.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20090131175922.GA50313@rebelion.Sisis.de> <200901311204.33808.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200901311204.33808.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE (i386) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gsasl 0.2.28_1 does not link in 7.1R X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:53:35 -0000 El día Saturday, January 31, 2009 a las 12:04:33PM -0900, Mel escribió: > Ok, it's not snmp. On second glance my link line is: ... > > Other then libidn, which should be unrelated, I don't see a difference. You > may need to file a problem report with the port maintainer. Following a wild guess I did: # pkg_delete krb5-1.6.3_5 # cd /usr/ports/security/gsasl # make clean # make # make install which worked fine; I will file a bug report. Thx for your time and help matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.oclc.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 07:42:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1608310656EE for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 07:42:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) Received: from hunter.Sisis.de (mail.oclc.de [193.31.11.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700568FC13 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 07:42:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) Received: (from mail@localhost) by hunter.Sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA24853 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:33:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) Received: from ppp-93-104-57-150.dynamic.mnet-online.de(93.104.57.150) by hunter.Sisis.de via smap (V2.1) id xma024846; Sun, 1 Feb 09 08:33:14 +0100 Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id n117gQMW004114 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:42:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to matthias.apitz@oclc.org using -f Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:42:26 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090201074226.GA4077@rebelion.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE (i386) Subject: LXDE && FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:42:35 -0000 Hello, There is a lot of LXDE (http://wiki.lxde.org/en/Main_Page) in the ports, but no masterport, like it exists for KDE or Gnome; is anybody working on a master port or has at least some installation guide worked-out? thanks in advance for sharing it; matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.oclc.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 09:03:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C2410657D5 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:03:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from mail1.hostpark.net (mail1.hostpark.net [212.243.197.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D5F18FC08 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:03:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EB1811A5; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:03:18 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Received: from mail1.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10124) with ESMTP id 6+543WguZ8Zl; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:03:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (43-140.79-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.79.140.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail1.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A854811A4; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:03:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n119MR0v005906; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:22:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: (from martin@localhost) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n119MQ4U005905; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:22:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from martin) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:22:26 +0100 From: Martin Schweizer To: Mel Message-ID: <20090201092226.GC54916@saturn.pcs.ms> Mail-Followup-To: Mel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Martin Schweizer References: <20090130172000.GA89911@saturn.pcs.ms> <200901300929.35395.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <200901300929.35395.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH, CH-8608 Bubikon, Switzerland X-PGP-Key: http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc X-Fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239 Cc: Martin Schweizer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange messages in /var/log/messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Schweizer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:03:20 -0000 Hello Mel Thank you for your answer. Regards. Am Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 09:29:35AM -0900 Mel schrieb: > On Friday 30 January 2009 08:20:00 Martin Schweizer wrote: >=20 > > Jan 30 17:54:45 firewall kernel: c > > Jan 30 17:54:46 firewall kernel: 0 > > Jan 30 17:54:57 firewall kernel: w > > Jan 30 17:54:57 firewall kernel: . > > Jan 30 17:55:53 firewall kernel: c > > Jan 30 17:55:53 firewall kernel: C > > Jan 30 17:55:53 firewall kernel: A > > Jan 30 17:55:57 firewall kernel: i > > Jan 30 17:55:57 firewall kernel: 9 > > Jan 30 17:56:29 firewall kernel: > > Jan 30 17:56:29 firewall kernel: 2 > > Jan 30 17:56:29 firewall kernel: 5 > > Jan 30 17:56:41 firewall kernel: 6 > > Jan 30 17:56:41 firewall kernel: > > Jan 30 17:56:41 firewall kernel: 6 > > Jan 30 17:56:44 firewall kernel: 9 > > Jan 30 17:56:44 firewall kernel: > > Jan 30 17:56:44 firewall kernel: . > > Jan 30 17:56:45 firewall kernel: e > > Jan 30 17:56:45 firewall kernel: > > Jan 30 17:56:45 firewall kernel: A > > Jan 30 17:57:01 firewall kernel: e > > Jan 30 17:57:01 firewall kernel: t > > Jan 30 17:57:01 firewall kernel: > > Jan 30 17:57:02 firewall kernel: 0 > > Jan 30 17:57:02 firewall kernel: . > > [snip] >=20 > Known problem on SMP systems, supposedly fixed in 7.1, but I don't use ip= fw. >=20 > --=20 > Mel >=20 > Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules > and never get to the software part. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --=20 Martin Schweizer PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH; Bannholzstrasse 6; CH-8608 Bubikon Tel. +41 55 243 30 00; Fax: +41 55 243 33 22; http://www.pc-service.ch; public key : http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc;=20 fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239; From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 09:12:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96CD106577E for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D4308FC13 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so428967yxb.13 for ; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:12:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ep6f/XkoPlrhofMOYLmx+lYBCmJl4WvrHa7PhohGfuU=; b=q05+X2Oq9MsleSRaK6gsA4vjkO376aVSkriiLRkWGRbd2lAPbKAui+9INw0AjAjzo2 FhLdqViAOLQtHZler2qgDKzZcKC31GUfIV/RXUrRc7Uy20fYnkpmaviiB1PX5QF8o43Q AvisL9XUlLht72aZcdQNMOmJPxDKXsMATQjiQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=NU2oVI5CNZkbA5MIvZ3eU+hpmP5PFGlMANIsvdl3EpUUv/bWgWJmDVZ1dAULTQCm3T 8xEtcY5NnRC7hCPnairxYTcsOLfv6f0uVIzz4kfzIar3DFbsAq45gdFWR5VVTYKXB8r9 gNXmP4L5iDecyq2Dedd05JJfcu1AO8WCDyiGw= Received: by 10.151.108.5 with SMTP id k5mr2601681ybm.194.1233479570762; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:12:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from phoenix ([168.220.99.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o29sm5651440elf.9.2009.02.01.01.12.49 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:12:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 04:12:47 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Antonio Rieser Message-ID: <20090201091247.GA7045@phoenix> References: <58a2fd890901311924s6bf36cb5w47d845d8d8090af8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <58a2fd890901311924s6bf36cb5w47d845d8d8090af8@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Graphics tablet / Xorg / mouse problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:12:52 -0000 Antonio Rieser said: > 2) If I remove the tablet from the computer (I've only tried it during > an X session), the system panics and shuts down, whether or not I stop > the wacom driver before removing the tablet. > Can you replicate this while viewing the console [ctrl+alt+f1] rather than an X session, to see exactly what the kernel is panicing from? (I know systems don't really like being forcibly paniced, but it may help figure out what is happening.) -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 09:59:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC3B1065675 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:59:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533188FC19 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:59:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (vpn-cl-167-222.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.167.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F388A000B; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:35:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <49856CE0.1030808@bsdforen.de> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:35:28 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Antonio Rieser References: <58a2fd890901311924s6bf36cb5w47d845d8d8090af8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <58a2fd890901311924s6bf36cb5w47d845d8d8090af8@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rhurlin , Glen Barber , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Vulpes Velox Subject: Re: Graphics tablet / Xorg / mouse problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:59:28 -0000 Antonio Rieser wrote: > Hi, > > I recently installed FreeBSD 7.1 on an ACER Aspire > 1680 laptop. I'm running KDE 3.5 and the most recent Xorg port with a > Wacom Bamboo tablet and the wacom driver from the ports collection. I > have the following problems with the tablet and mouse: > > 1) If I boot without the tablet plugged in, then plug it in later and > restart X, the error message > > (EE) intel(0): [DRI] Unlocking inconsistency: > Context 676684348 trying to unlock lock held by context 2 > (EE) intel(0): [DRI] Locking deadlock. > Already locked with context 676684348, > trying to lock with context 2. > > is written to Xorg.0.log and kdm-bin.log so many times that it fills > my /var partition and locks my system. Note that if I boot with the > tablet already plugged in, this error doesn't appear, and everything > works fine. This is actually not connected to the tablet in my opinion, it's a problem with 3D-acceleration of your video card, which apparently does not like being reset/restarted. Can you show us your Device Section? > I loading the driver via the line > > 'uwacom_load="YES" > > in /boot/loader.conf > > 2) If I remove the tablet from the computer (I've only tried it during > an X session), the system panics and shuts down, whether or not I stop > the wacom driver before removing the tablet. OK, this sounds like a serious kernel problem. > 3) If I stop the wacom driver, then start it again, I cannot simply > restart X and have the tablet work. I have to reboot in order for the > tablet to be recognized, even in mouse mode. That's because the driver can not start a rescan of the hardware. It can only hook in when the tablet gets first detected. This is why the module has to be loaded from loader.conf. > 4) Occasionally the pointer refuses to stay put and drifts to the top > of the screen. Controlling the pointer with the mouse becomes > difficult at this point, too, since it wants to float upwards. > Unfortunately, I have difficulty reproducing this reliably. Once it > starts, though, it doesn't stop until I end the X session. If the > problem starts and then I stop the wacom driver without restarting X, > it continues anyway. I have that with a cheap optical mouse sometimes, I plug it out and back in and the problem is gone. Since that panics your system this is hardly an acceptable solution. Anyway it looks to me like that is a hardware problem. > 5) Xorg.0.log contains the following error (also included below): > > pad Wacom X driver can't grab event device, errno=1005 > > (I haven't honestly noticed any strange behavior on the 'pad' device, however.) Well, I have taken the liberty to forward this mail to Bartosz, he might be able to do something with that. Obviously the driver does not handle all data generated by the pad. > Regarding 1) - and maybe 3) & 4) - my guess is that the tablet is > fighting with the mouse for control of the pointer, but I don't know > how to check if that's the case or how to fix it if it is. No, that's not the way things work. I think you are facing two distinct problems here. One with your video card and one with the tablet driver. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 11:07:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFA11065672; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:07:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9829C8FC0A; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:07:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1LTaAl-0007Fg-Gx>; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:07:31 +0100 Received: from e178029120.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.29.120] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1LTaAl-0007ma-Do>; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:07:31 +0100 Message-ID: <49858274.6090807@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:07:32 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090131) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Goncharov References: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <200901301430.07087.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.29.120 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:07:33 -0000 Alex Goncharov wrote: > ,--- You/O. (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:39:03 +0100) ----* > | I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary > | and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects. > | Interestingly, the first three entries show up something missing - > > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox3 ldd /usr/local/lib/firefox3/firefox-bin | head -n 5 > /usr/local/lib/firefox3/firefox-bin: > libxul.so => /usr/local/lib/firefox3/libxul.so (0x28087000) > libmozjs.so => /usr/local/lib/firefox3/libmozjs.so (0x28e8f000) > libxpcom.so => /usr/local/lib/firefox3/libxpcom.so (0x28f1f000) > > firefox3 sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH for you :-) > It does not! ... on all of my boxes (amd64), it does not ... even on those machines where Firefox3 is running, these libs are empty. But I realized that those boxes are capable running firefox3 after the 'great Xorg-update-catastrophy' have still installed firefox2 ... I will check tomorrow at the lab if this do have an influence of the proper work abilities of firefox3 when removing the old firefox2. When setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH manually, adding /usr/lib/firefox3/, it doesn't change the bad situation on the failing CURRENT amd64 box. > | thor# ldd firefox-bin > | firefox-bin: > | libxul.so => not found (0x0) > | libmozjs.so => not found (0x0) > | libxpcom.so => not found (0x0) > | libplds4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 (0x80063e000) > > -- Alex -- alex-goncharov@comcast.net -- > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 11:29:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42CE106564A; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE988FC18; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:29:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1LTaVW-0001Ue-M2>; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:28:58 +0100 Received: from e178029120.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.29.120] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1LTaVW-0000B5-Iy>; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:28:58 +0100 Message-ID: <4985877B.8080502@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:28:59 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090131) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scot Hetzel References: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <200901301430.07087.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <790a9fff0901312008x71fa025na58856bde4c7a5be@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0901312008x71fa025na58856bde4c7a5be@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.29.120 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Mel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:29:01 -0000 Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:39 PM, O. Hartmann > wrote: > >> build-process, but I doubt this. I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary >> and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects. >> Interestingly, the first three entries show up something missing - >> therefore I deinstalled Firefox and rebuild the browser after an >> additional rebuild of libxcb (via portupgrade -rf). Previously, all Xorg >> > > >> thor# ldd firefox-bin >> firefox-bin: >> libxul.so => not found (0x0) >> libmozjs.so => not found (0x0) >> libxpcom.so => not found (0x0) >> libplds4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 (0x80063e000) >> libplc4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplc4.so.1 (0x80076f000) >> > > When firefox3 was first added to the ports collection, I had noticed > this problem with firefox3 (after using sysutils/libchk), but I didn't > have this problem with the firefox 2. A look at the difference > between the www/firefox and www/firefox3 Makefiles showed that > firefox3 was missing this: > > LDFLAGS+= -Wl,-rpath,${PREFIX}/lib/${MOZ_RPATH} > > After adding this line to the ports Makefile, and rebuilding the port, > these libraries are now showing as found in the ldd output. > > Scot > Isn't that worth a PR? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 12:56:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9E61065673 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:56:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex-goncharov@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745368FC13 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:56:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex-goncharov@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.35]) by QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id AcgD1b0050ldTLk54cwizW; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:56:42 +0000 Received: from daland.home ([24.34.211.11]) by OMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Acwh1b00L0FJTGg3Qcwiqi; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:56:42 +0000 Received: from algo by daland.home with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LTbsO-000OYb-BL; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:56:40 -0500 From: Alex Goncharov To: "O. Hartmann" In-reply-to: <49858274.6090807@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> (ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) References: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <200901301430.07087.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <49858274.6090807@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Message-Id: Sender: Alex Goncharov Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:56:40 -0500 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net, alex-goncharov@comcast.net Subject: Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alex Goncharov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:56:43 -0000 ,--- You/O. (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:07:32 +0100) ----* | Alex Goncharov wrote: | > ,--- You/O. (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:39:03 +0100) ----* | > | I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary | > | and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects. | > | Interestingly, the first three entries show up something missing - | > | > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox3 ldd /usr/local/lib/firefox3/firefox-bin | head -n 5 | > /usr/local/lib/firefox3/firefox-bin: | > libxul.so => /usr/local/lib/firefox3/libxul.so (0x28087000) | > libmozjs.so => /usr/local/lib/firefox3/libmozjs.so (0x28e8f000) | > libxpcom.so => /usr/local/lib/firefox3/libxpcom.so (0x28f1f000) | > | > firefox3 sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH for you :-) | > | It does not! ---------------------------------------------------------------------- $ grep run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/bin/firefox3 # Use run-mozilla.sh in the current dir if it exists # If not, then start resolving symlinks until we find run-mozilla.sh run_moz="$curdir/run-mozilla.sh" run_moz="$curdir/run-mozilla.sh" run_moz="$dist_bin/run-mozilla.sh" if [ -x "$moz_libdir/run-mozilla.sh" ]; then echo $dist_bin/run-mozilla.sh $script_args $dist_bin/$MOZILLA_BIN "$@" "$dist_bin/run-mozilla.sh" $script_args "$dist_bin/$MOZILLA_BIN" "$@" $ grep LD_LIBRARY_PATH /usr/local/lib/firefox3/run-mozilla.sh ## Set LD_LIBRARY_PATH ## On Solaris we use $ORIGIN (set in RUNPATH) instead of LD_LIBRARY_PATH ## under dist/bin. To solve the problem, we should rely on LD_LIBRARY_PATH LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${MOZ_DIST_BIN}:${MOZ_DIST_BIN}/plugins:${MRE_HOME}${LD_LIBRARY_PATH+":$LD_LIBRARY_PATH"} if [ -n "$LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64" ]; then LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64=${MOZ_DIST_BIN}:${MOZ_DIST_BIN}/plugins:${MRE_HOME}${LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64+":$LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64"} ## Set DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH for Mac OS X (Darwin) DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=${MOZ_DIST_BIN}:${MRE_HOME}${DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH+":$DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH"} echo " LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH" if [ -n "$LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64" ]; then echo "LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64" echo "DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=$DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH" export MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME LD_LIBRARY_PATH export SHLIB_PATH LIBPATH LIBRARY_PATH ADDON_PATH DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH ---------------------------------------------------------------------- No, it doesn't? | ... on all of my boxes (amd64), it does not ... even on those | machines where Firefox3 is running, these libs are empty. But I | realized that those boxes are capable running firefox3 after the | 'great Xorg-update-catastrophy' have still installed firefox2 ... I | will check tomorrow at the lab if this do have an influence of the | proper work abilities of firefox3 when removing the old firefox2. | | When setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH manually, adding /usr/lib/firefox3/, it | doesn't change the bad situation on the failing CURRENT amd64 box. All I was saying was that your ldd experiment was... hmm... not correct (if you agree with mine, of course). -- Alex -- alex-goncharov@comcast.net -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 12:59:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D342F106567C for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:59:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex-goncharov@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4BD8FC17 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 12:59:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex-goncharov@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.35]) by QMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id AcgD1b0050ldTLk53czPrb; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:59:23 +0000 Received: from daland.home ([24.34.211.11]) by OMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id AczP1b00C0FJTGg3QczPH7; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:59:23 +0000 Received: from algo by daland.home with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LTbv0-000Oa8-4A; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:59:22 -0500 From: Alex Goncharov To: Mel In-reply-to: <200901312005.51125.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> (message from Mel on Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:05:50 -0900) References: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <200901301430.07087.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <200901312005.51125.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Message-Id: Sender: Alex Goncharov Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:59:22 -0500 Cc: ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension " missing on display ":0.0". X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alex Goncharov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:59:24 -0000 ,--- You/Mel (Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:05:50 -0900) ----* | As a sidenote, it would be nice if xorg-server14 port would be created till | the dust has settled. Very, very nice. Almost as nice as xorg-server being the old, working xorg-server and xorg-server-devel the new, broken one. -- Alex -- alex-goncharov@comcast.net -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 13:01:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF371065674 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4228FC19 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:01:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-196-52-176.dynamic.qsc.de [92.196.52.176]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CF93CF43 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:01:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n11D12dt002522 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:01:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:01:02 +0100 From: Polytropon To: FreeBSD Questions Message-Id: <20090201140102.e9a9a41a.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Tool to uncat file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:01:16 -0000 Dear list, before starting to code on my own, I'd like to ask if there's already a tool to uncat files, defining the file separation position as a string of bytes, usually given in hexadecimal form. An example could be this: % uncat -p 0x12,0x52,0xf1,0x09 file_orig It creates file_1 file_2 file_3. And, of course, % cat file_1 file_2 file_3 > file_orig would re-create the original file. The bytes 0x12,0x52,0xf1,0x09 tell the file starting pattern (-p), where a new file begins. I cannot use dd due to the fact that the files concatenated are of a different size. So the idea would be to look for specific byte pattern and then start a new file each time it occurs on input. Is there such a tool, or any other ideas? -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 13:11:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555BC106566B for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from will.rutherdale@utoronto.ca) Received: from mail.vex.net (smaug.vex.net [208.76.104.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0418FC18 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from will.rutherdale@utoronto.ca) Received: from [192.168.110.8] (unknown [207.35.13.130]) by mail.vex.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B8D00173D0 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:11:25 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <49859F76.3010707@utoronto.ca> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:11:18 -0500 From: William Gordon Rutherdale User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14ubu (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20090201140102.e9a9a41a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20090201140102.e9a9a41a.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Tool to uncat file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:11:27 -0000 $ man split This (split) is the standard unix utility to break a file up into pieces. It breaks it down either by a fixed number of lines or by a fixed number of bytes. Also the rules for dividing lines is simplistic: simple newline division, no special escape handling. If that doesn't suit your purpose, then you have to write your own custom split-like utility. I've done that in the past. For instance I once wrote a routine in Perl at work to divide Informix format .unl files (database dump), with special escape rules for newlines and special handling of binary data. For what you're describing you probably want to write a C program to do the job. -Will Polytropon wrote: > Dear list, > > before starting to code on my own, I'd like to ask if there's already a > tool to uncat files, defining the file separation position as a string > of bytes, usually given in hexadecimal form. > > An example could be this: > > % uncat -p 0x12,0x52,0xf1,0x09 file_orig > > It creates file_1 file_2 file_3. And, of course, > > % cat file_1 file_2 file_3 > file_orig > > would re-create the original file. The bytes 0x12,0x52,0xf1,0x09 tell the > file starting pattern (-p), where a new file begins. > > I cannot use dd due to the fact that the files concatenated are of a > different size. So the idea would be to look for specific byte pattern > and then start a new file each time it occurs on input. > > Is there such a tool, or any other ideas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 13:23:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F77D106564A for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrewhw@ieee.org) Received: from mailserv.mta.ca (mailserv.mta.ca [138.73.1.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423DF8FC1A for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrewhw@ieee.org) Received: from [138.73.29.51] (helo=qemg.org) by mailserv.mta.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1LTbtl-0001l4-W4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:58:06 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:59:02 -0400 (AST) From: Andrew Hamilton-Wright Sender: andrew@qemg.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: dump(8) using snapshot + "recommended" cache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:23:45 -0000 Hi All; I regularly use dump(8) with snapshots to back up my server. While this seems to have been working perfectly well so far, upon (re)reading the man page for dump(8), I have noticed a somewhat scary pair of lines in the paragraph describing the option for -C (emphasis with stars mine): [Use of this option] will greatly improve performance at the cost of ***dump possibly not noticing changes in the file system*** between passes. ***It is recommended that you always use this option when dumping a snapshot.*** Does anyone know what, exactly, this means? In particular, is the first statement actually trying to say: Use of this option will greatly improve performance; however it may be that changes made to the filesystem made between _dump_ passes will be ignored. ***The resulting dumped filesystem image will be consistent and correct based on a timestamp no later than that of the point at which the dump was started***. Is this a fair statement? Is this guaranteed? Or are we trying to say that: The resulting filesystem will contain images of individual files based on a timestamp no later than that of the point at which the dump was started, however any individual files modified after the dump begins may be stored using any of the version that appeared written to disk during the period of the dump. As far as the second line goes, I am not at all clear on what this is trying to say. Why is the cache recommended? For speed? Stability? Output correctness? In particular, if a snapshot dump is made without a cache option, is it potentially corrupt? In particular, if the second attempt above is more true than the first, it seems to me that we should _not_ recommend the use of a cache with snapshots, as it seems to erode the utility of the snapshot itself. It is for this reason that I am suspecting that there is more here than meets the eye, which is why I am keen to make sure that this is clear. I am very happy to put in an update to the docs if we can make sure that we know exactly what we are trying to say here. Thanks, Andrew. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 13:34:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D29106564A for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:34:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7284C8FC08 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:34:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n11DY8uD065402; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:34:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n11DY8RP065399; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:34:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:34:08 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Andrew Hamilton-Wright In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090201143340.U65379@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dump(8) using snapshot + "recommended" cache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:34:19 -0000 > > I regularly use dump(8) with snapshots to back up my server. > > While this seems to have been working perfectly well so far, > upon (re)reading the man page for dump(8), I have noticed a > somewhat scary pair of lines in the paragraph describing > the option for -C (emphasis with stars mine): > > [Use of this option] will greatly improve performance > at the cost of ***dump possibly not noticing changes in > the file system*** between passes. > > ***It is recommended that you always use this option when > dumping a snapshot.*** > > Does anyone know what, exactly, this means? no, in my experience it's no difference in speed with this enabled or not. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 13:50:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59ABD1065674; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:50:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5FD28FC16; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1LTcik-0003mx-F9>; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:50:46 +0100 Received: from e178029120.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.29.120] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.69) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1LTcik-0006Sh-AD>; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:50:46 +0100 Message-ID: <4985A8B7.2040307@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:50:47 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090131) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alex Goncharov References: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <200901301430.07087.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <49858274.6090807@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 85.178.29.120 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:50:49 -0000 Alex Goncharov wrote: > ,--- You/O. (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:07:32 +0100) ----* > | Alex Goncharov wrote: > | > ,--- You/O. (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 01:39:03 +0100) ----* > | > | I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary > | > | and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects. > | > | Interestingly, the first three entries show up something missing - > | > > | > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/firefox3 ldd /usr/local/lib/firefox3/firefox-bin | head -n 5 > | > /usr/local/lib/firefox3/firefox-bin: > | > libxul.so => /usr/local/lib/firefox3/libxul.so (0x28087000) > | > libmozjs.so => /usr/local/lib/firefox3/libmozjs.so (0x28e8f000) > | > libxpcom.so => /usr/local/lib/firefox3/libxpcom.so (0x28f1f000) > | > > | > firefox3 sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH for you :-) > | > > | It does not! > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > $ grep run-mozilla.sh /usr/local/bin/firefox3 > # Use run-mozilla.sh in the current dir if it exists > # If not, then start resolving symlinks until we find run-mozilla.sh > run_moz="$curdir/run-mozilla.sh" > run_moz="$curdir/run-mozilla.sh" > run_moz="$dist_bin/run-mozilla.sh" > if [ -x "$moz_libdir/run-mozilla.sh" ]; then > echo $dist_bin/run-mozilla.sh $script_args $dist_bin/$MOZILLA_BIN "$@" > "$dist_bin/run-mozilla.sh" $script_args "$dist_bin/$MOZILLA_BIN" "$@" > > > $ grep LD_LIBRARY_PATH /usr/local/lib/firefox3/run-mozilla.sh > ## Set LD_LIBRARY_PATH > ## On Solaris we use $ORIGIN (set in RUNPATH) instead of LD_LIBRARY_PATH > ## under dist/bin. To solve the problem, we should rely on LD_LIBRARY_PATH > LD_LIBRARY_PATH=${MOZ_DIST_BIN}:${MOZ_DIST_BIN}/plugins:${MRE_HOME}${LD_LIBRARY_PATH+":$LD_LIBRARY_PATH"} > if [ -n "$LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64" ]; then > LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64=${MOZ_DIST_BIN}:${MOZ_DIST_BIN}/plugins:${MRE_HOME}${LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64+":$LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64"} > ## Set DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH for Mac OS X (Darwin) > DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=${MOZ_DIST_BIN}:${MRE_HOME}${DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH+":$DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH"} > echo " LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH" > if [ -n "$LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64" ]; then > echo "LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64" > echo "DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH=$DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH" > export MOZILLA_FIVE_HOME LD_LIBRARY_PATH > export SHLIB_PATH LIBPATH LIBRARY_PATH ADDON_PATH DYLD_LIBRARY_PATH > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > No, it doesn't? > > | ... on all of my boxes (amd64), it does not ... even on those > | machines where Firefox3 is running, these libs are empty. But I > | realized that those boxes are capable running firefox3 after the > | 'great Xorg-update-catastrophy' have still installed firefox2 ... I > | will check tomorrow at the lab if this do have an influence of the > | proper work abilities of firefox3 when removing the old firefox2. > | > | When setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH manually, adding /usr/lib/firefox3/, it > | doesn't change the bad situation on the failing CURRENT amd64 box. > > All I was saying was that your ldd experiment was... hmm... not > correct (if you agree with mine, of course). > Saying, it was stupid? You're correct. It was stupid and, of course, it doesn't matter if the libs show up or not. I thought, at the first shot, firefox3 binary needs to have a complete reference to all of its libraries, but thinking so leads the advantage of having dynamical loadable objects ad absurdum. Greetings, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 14:02:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7641065674 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:02:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex-goncharov@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C258FC1D for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alex-goncharov@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.11]) by QMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id AcdX1b00D0EZKEL57e2moo; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:02:46 +0000 Received: from daland.home ([24.34.211.11]) by OMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Ae2l1b00N0FJTGg3Me2lb4; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:02:46 +0000 Received: from algo by daland.home with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LTcuK-000PAn-2f; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:02:44 -0500 From: Alex Goncharov To: "O. Hartmann" In-reply-to: <4985A8B7.2040307@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> (ohartman@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de) References: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <200901301430.07087.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <49858274.6090807@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <4985A8B7.2040307@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Message-Id: Sender: Alex Goncharov Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 09:02:44 -0500 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net, alex-goncharov@comcast.net Subject: Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alex Goncharov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:02:46 -0000 ,--- I/Alex (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:56:40 -0500) ----* | All I was saying was that your ldd experiment was... hmm... not | correct (if you agree with mine, of course). ,--- You/O. (Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:50:47 +0100) ----* | Saying, it was stupid? You're correct. It was stupid and, of course, it | doesn't matter if the libs show up or not. Not stupid -- you tried various things in desperation and hurry, and reported your observations and thoughts. It's normal :-) | I thought, at the first shot, firefox3 binary needs to have a | complete reference to all of its libraries, but thinking so leads | the advantage of having dynamical loadable objects ad absurdum. Glad this is cleared now! -- Alex -- alex-goncharov@comcast.net -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 14:07:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC92D106566B; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:07:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanefbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9098FC19; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:07:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanefbsd@gmail.com) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.7] (may be forged)) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.14.3+UW08.09/8.14.3+UW09.01) with ESMTP id n11E7jWO031082 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:07:46 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.10.3] (adsl-99-139-49-79.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [99.139.49.79]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.14.3+UW08.09/8.14.3+UW09.01) with ESMTP id n11E7i5j008276 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:07:45 -0800 Message-Id: From: Garrett Cooper To: Mel In-Reply-To: <200901312005.51125.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:12:45 -0800 References: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <200901301430.07087.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <200901312005.51125.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-PMX-Version: 5.5.0.356843, Antispam-Engine: 2.6.1.350677, Antispam-Data: 2009.2.1.135535 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=8%, Report='FORGED_FROM_GMAIL 0.1, BODY_SIZE_2000_2999 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FRAUD_419_WEBMAIL 0, __FRAUD_419_WEBMAIL_FROM 0, __FROM_GMAIL 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __STOCK_PHRASE_7 0' Cc: "O. Hartmann" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension " missing on display ":0.0". X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:07:47 -0000 On Jan 31, 2009, at 9:05 PM, Mel wrote: > On Saturday 31 January 2009 15:39:03 O. Hartmann wrote: >> Mel wrote: >>> On Friday 30 January 2009 13:19:41 O. Hartmann wrote: >>>> After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new >>>> xorg-7.4 >>>> and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package >>>> twice now >>>> firefox3 still doesn't work properly and hits me when starting >>>> with this >>>> error message: >>>> >>>> Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ": >>>> 0.0". >>>> >>>> Then firefox3 freezes forever, showing something like the >>>> background or >>>> pixel remnants of windows/picograms moving over its window. >>> >>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2008-October/039134.html >> >> Well, that doesn't help very much. As R. Noland wrote, the error >> coming >> up isn't of any harm. >> >> I still have Firefox3 not working on a FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT/AMD64 UP >> box, >> running the most recent FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT and having now recompiled >> three time EVERYTHING, Firefox3 inclusive. Firefox3 is still stuck >> when >> it comes to pulldown menus or requester for download destination, >> eating >> up 100% CPU time and slowing down the box incredible. I pretty sure I >> have all the stuff of the X11 suite in the right place and the right >> revision number, as I said, I recompiled everything three times and I >> did several attempts upgrading the whole Xorg since sunday last week. > > You have 2 choices: > - revert to known working xorg-server-1.4 (xorg 7.3) > - try to debug this using the send-pr system, given the ammount of > problems > people are posting with this xorg-server, more datapoints are not a > bad > thing. > > As a sidenote, it would be nice if xorg-server14 port would be > created till > the dust has settled. I don't have an issue with any cairo related ports after upgrading to xorg 7.4. Of course I had to rebuild everything dependent on libxcb, but that took no more than one iteration to complete (apart from xchat2, which took 4 iterations to finish because of some wonky library mucking up the works). Yay for statically linked library code - _-... -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 14:12:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF6671065673 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi@k1.com.br) Received: from netuno.levier.com.br (netuno.levier.com.br [201.47.3.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10A88FC16 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:12:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi@k1.com.br) Received: from oldnetuno.levier.com.br (oldnetuno [192.168.32.12]) by netuno.levier.com.br (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n11DcDlt041577; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:38:14 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from lenzi@k1.com.br) Received: from levier.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by oldnetuno.levier.com.br (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n11D60NE058094; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:38:11 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from lenzi@k1.com.br) X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (levier.com.br) Received: from [201.21.163.184] (authenticated as k1) by levier.com.br (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 1 Feb 2009 13:38:11 -0000 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=E9rgio?= de Almeida Lenzi To: Antonio Rieser , questions In-Reply-To: <58a2fd890901310001o31d22e6bg84df4c64ac79e0c9@mail.gmail.com> References: <58a2fd890901310001o31d22e6bg84df4c64ac79e0c9@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="=-3gRt9ro8olaZdAISJCmz" Organization: Lzt Tecnologia Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:38:12 -0200 Message-Id: <1233495492.13844.12.camel@k2.cwb.casa> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Gnucash slow startup on FreeBSD 7.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lenzi@k1.com.br List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:12:06 -0000 --=-3gRt9ro8olaZdAISJCmz Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Here I notice that the problem is in glib2 gnucach, and evolution makes a dlopen with a wrong option in BSD, so it scans all the machine for shared libraries... and it takes a lot of cpu and a lot of time a fix in glib makes the trick... (it is an ugly fix, but works...) the fix at http://patches.k1.com.br/glib20-patch-x1 and insert code for gnucash and apply it to glib code (/usr/ports/deve/glib20) reinstall glib, and see if works..... Hope it helps.... Sergio --=-3gRt9ro8olaZdAISJCmz-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 15:44:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A6A106566B for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:44:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from mail1.hostpark.net (mail1.hostpark.net [212.243.197.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD7B8FC14 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:44:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0034C811D5; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:44:07 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Received: from mail1.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10124) with ESMTP id ouq9-LsjXLcm; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:44:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (43-140.79-83.cust.bluewin.ch [83.79.140.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail1.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855AF811CC; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:44:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n11G3DZC008222; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:03:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: (from martin@localhost) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n11G3DvE008221; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:03:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from martin) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:03:12 +0100 From: Martin Schweizer To: Tim Judd Message-ID: <20090201160311.GD54916@saturn.pcs.ms> Mail-Followup-To: Tim Judd , Martin Schweizer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20090130172843.GB89911@saturn.pcs.ms> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH, CH-8608 Bubikon, Switzerland X-PGP-Key: http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc X-Fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239 Cc: Martin Schweizer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Using Serial Port Other Than sio0 for the Console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Schweizer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:44:10 -0000 Hello Tim Probably I find the problem. I did not read care enough the article 26.6.5.2. I will try it asap (in the next few days). I will keep you updated. Regards, Am Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 12:09:28PM -0700 Tim Judd schrieb: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Martin Schweizer > wrote: > > > Hello > > > > I want to use sio1 for console access. I read chapter 26.6 in the handbook > > and did the following: > > > > /boot.config: > > -P > > > > /boot/device.hints: > > [snip] > > hint.sio.0.at="isa" > > hint.sio.0.port="0x3F8" > > ### hint.sio.0.flags="0x10" > > hint.sio.0.irq="4" > > hint.sio.1.at="isa" > > hint.sio.1.port="0x2F8" > > hint.sio.1.flags="0x10" > > hint.sio.1.irq="3" > > [snip] > > > > My custom kernel: > > [snip] > > device sio > > [snip] > > > > /var/run/dmesg.boot: > > [snip] > > sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > sio0: port may not be enabled > > sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > sio0: port may not be enabled > > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0 > > sio0: type 16550A > > sio0: [FILTER] > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > sio1: port may not be enabled > > sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 > > sio1: port may not be enabled > > sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 flags 0x10 on > > acpi0 > > sio1: type 16550A, console > > sio1: [FILTER] > > [snip] > > > > /etc/ttys: > > [snip] > > ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 on secure > > ttyd1 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 on secure > > ttyd2 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 on secure > > ttyd3 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 on secure > > [snip] > > > > The baud rate etc. are correct as well (the standard settings). > > > > The problem is I get no connection. I'm sure that my terminal works correct > > because I can connect other FreeBSD sever over the serial cable but not the > > above. > > Any ideas? > > > > Kind regards, > > > > -- > > > > Martin Schweizer > > > > > > PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH; Bannholzstrasse 6; CH-8608 Bubikon > > Tel. +41 55 243 30 00; Fax: +41 55 243 33 22; http://www.pc-service.ch; > > public key : http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc; > > fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239; > > > > Surprised nobody's really responded. > > Enabling serial logins on ttyd1 (COM2 in Microsoft terms) is on -- it's > defined in your ttys. The guaranteed "enabling" is to restart, but I've > heard that sigHUP init will reread ttys and enable logins (but I hadn't got > that to work yet). > > Enabling serial as your console output (in terms of the boot process and > everything) should be, if available, enabled in /boot/loader.conf > > There doesn't seem to be a setting to enable COM2 as your console device, > the only options (by reading through /boot/defaults/loader.conf) is to > enable comconsole, which runs over COM1 > > You would likely have to hack the bootloader files in source and reinstall > to get that kind of functionality. > > > Does this help? let me know if you want more help. I like enabling serial > console for the fact that you can get into out-of-bounds management this way > easily. > > --Tim > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Martin Schweizer PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH; Bannholzstrasse 6; CH-8608 Bubikon Tel. +41 55 243 30 00; Fax: +41 55 243 33 22; http://www.pc-service.ch; public key : http://www.pc-service.ch/pgp/public_key.asc; fingerprint: EC21 CA4D 5C78 BC2D 73B7 10F9 C1AE 1691 D30F D239; From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 15:47:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29881065686 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:47:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from mailrelay010.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay010.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9016A8FC1A for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:47:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al4FAH9LhUlR9c98/2dsb2JhbACBbsUShBQG Received: from 124.207-245-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.kotnet.org) ([81.245.207.124]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2009 16:18:08 +0100 Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.kotnet.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n11FI7lE099174; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:18:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) From: Tijl Coosemans To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Tore Lund Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:18:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <4982196B.9010308@next.online.no> In-Reply-To: <4982196B.9010308@next.online.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902011618.07115.tijl@ulyssis.org> Cc: Subject: Re: Excessive letter-spacing in firefox3 under wine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:47:27 -0000 On Thursday 29 January 2009 22:02:35 Tore Lund wrote: > Subject line says it all - large gaps between all letters. Here is a > screenshot: http://softblur.com/misc/spacing.jpg. > > I suppose there are others who run firefox3 under wine on 7.1-RELEASE > with no problems, so can anyone think of what's wrong? I have imported > fonts from my Windows 2000 installation, and I am using the same profile > that works well with native FreeBSD firefox and firefox on Windows 2000. > I believe this did not happen with firefox2. Grateful for any hint. What exactly did you do to import those fonts? You should put them in a separate directory under /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts, create fonts.scale and fonts.dir in that directory using mkfontscale and mkfontdir, then run "fc-cache -f -v" and (for completeness) add a FontPath entry to your xorg.conf. Alternatively, you can install the x11-fonts/webfonts port, which contains the most commonly used fonts. > (Actually, I only use wine in order to get flash9, so if anyone could > help me solve this problem instead, that's even better. I have tried > the available recipes with no success - my firefox3 just freezes.) Try to get it to work under linux-firefox first. - Remove all linux-*, linux_base-* and nspluginwrapper packages you've currently installed. - Remove any stale npwrapper plugins from the following directories and their subdirectories: ~/.mozilla/plugins /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins /usr/local/lib/npapi /usr/local/lib/firefox/plugins - Check that you have these settings in each file: * /etc/make.conf: OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f8 * /etc/sysctl.conf: compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16 * /etc/rc.conf: linux_enable="YES" * /etc/fstab: linprocfs /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw 0 0 - Reboot or alternatively you can run these commands as root: sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.16 mount /compat/linux/proc - Install www/linux-firefox and www/linux-flashplugin9. - Check if the plugin works in linux-firefox. - Install www/nspluginwrapper. - Run these commands as root: nspluginwrapper -v -i /usr/local/lib/npapi/linux-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so ln -sf /usr/local/lib/browser_plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so /usr/local/lib/npapi/symlinks/firefox/ - Check if the plugin works in native firefox. This should get the plugin working, but it'll still crash or freeze the browser sometimes. You can kill the plugin with "killall npviewer.bin". You also might want to install a plugin like www/xpi-flashblock. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 16:19:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A811065672 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:19:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zflyer@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409298FC22 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:19:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zflyer@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1214165rvf.43 for ; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:19:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=D43l6OFhMMuhPgBtE1NpbJY4hGDg6r5CDmRlyZwyVFc=; b=AZ1evI6DmMFCWZvu5EZfa50DavMzwx1qPFl8kDMll5cm7n/DouCzdFI61V3Cz/Axow efZtgYSVSobykKOpuQIWoyuxfGWI9Zf8RrLFhbVCb5S+ThpA9L6DVCYxtrY0z5syLVcm KvN7+nQLJbwgYYrSfBsL1/1mL3pQIoXE09AO4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=IGbUNM4ZcH8tDiStw1YAb4jp3lCWFBwaCcrq7wRMgx4A78/v4Vfbib14Vd3lX85bOn mIUd0mX5QBDM46863xxvApygwwCjFYwPP8PJK5kOX/jRaTIvPsB7MeKayYM7N3iQ/PwW VgnX5evoivy+lQwG+COD7lGWIMS8kgbPrL7lE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.141.122.1 with SMTP id z1mr1786665rvm.49.1233503309464; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:48:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:48:29 -0500 Message-ID: <6293ba970902010748h5e46327nb7085aa753c04e1e@mail.gmail.com> From: Walker To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Reading a DVD UDF volume label X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:19:11 -0000 Hello, Does anyone know how to retrieve a DVD's UDF volume label from the CLI? I'm trying to write a script that will catalog a DVD's contents and automatically assign it a filename based on the UDF label. Things I've tried so far: The "file -s /dev/acd0" command. cdrtools-devel's "cdrecord -minfo" Using "dd" and "strings". Any help appreciated. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 16:23:43 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7517106566C for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:23:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from AHamiltonWright@MtA.ca) Received: from mailserv.mta.ca (mailserv.mta.ca [138.73.1.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1938FC0A for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:23:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from AHamiltonWright@MtA.ca) Received: from [138.73.29.51] (helo=qemg.org) by mailserv.mta.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1LTeae-0001MP-5A for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:50:32 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:51:29 -0400 (AST) From: Andrew Hamilton-Wright Sender: andrew@qemg.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: dump(8) using snapshot + "recommended" cache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:23:44 -0000 > I regularly use dump(8) with snapshots to back up my server. > > While this seems to have been working perfectly well so far, Sorry to follow-up my own post; I just realized I hadn't mentioned any version info. The docs I am reading are the ones associated with 7.1-RELEASE; I haven't checked whether this part of the dump documentation got updated with 7.1 or not. Thanks, Andrew. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 16:28:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D8A1065693 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:28:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f21.google.com (mail-bw0-f21.google.com [209.85.218.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D30EF8FC0C for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:28:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so65107bwz.19 for ; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:28:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=AbLFumCn5skRO01npRqn9ibOuJ4PMLtoXxS+tBfgSIY=; b=TGxDI3ip1b7KPDFiPpLIu+ZrKNVPkPisWqlgJ6M1Wpd7MOkjjKOxpHjeh1xrqAjTra TlkQB2+A0exiJqs0PqtIpdjjOy4iKLuPjb3SGAC/WAcXmCPbP9r/OWAJqgYMekbYcDJv IWR1pIgwo7RPToXaUg9HSSHgUqxWNlq1FLMHA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sASV/tXDRranclz+gBUNOzDCjnHayGsuMnhkJbl0yEa9DAxEI0ZTDOxOcvFeTxUEAf G5Jy5gzYM1yn7S7JIo9pgguLaAbEip27PhLMA4OSydxgqRhI6b75qxRVOmbsVupcnjKF QfQUfq7YDDL0GvvJOpYIxQUAuUVVllRWF7aI4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.103.147 with SMTP id k19mr1545130fao.0.1233505697410; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:28:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <26ddd1750901291933i31f31328rffcb3e5116cb1bf@mail.gmail.com> References: <26ddd1750901291933i31f31328rffcb3e5116cb1bf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 11:28:17 -0500 Message-ID: <26ddd1750902010828q1ac3875as32b881ce4fb086a3@mail.gmail.com> From: Maxim Khitrov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Shuttle for a BSD file server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:28:37 -0000 On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > Greetings, > > I'm planning to build a new home file server for myself, starting with > about 2TB of RAID6 space, but with room to grow in the future. Most of > that will be on SATA drives, but I may throw in two SAS drives in > RAID1 for the base OS, hence the SAS raid controller and enclosure. > The highest priority for this build is data security, followed by > performance and uptime. > > Rather than go for server-grade components, I thought that I should > instead try to separate storage from the server itself. It's cheaper > (sort of), easier to upgrade in the future, and if the server goes > down for some reason, I can just put the raid card into another > machine and once again have access to my data. The other advantage > with this build is that I already have a Q6600 and some DDR2 memory > around, so that will save me money on having to get Xeons and ECC > memory. With that in mind, I currently have the following components > picked out (listed below). > > I would like to know whether anyone has used any of these with FreeBSD > 7.x, or if you have some other suggestions for what I should look into > (am I asking for trouble by using these parts for a 24/7 file server > in terms of stability)? I know that the 3ware controller should be > supported, but I'm not sure about the Shuttle. How does FreeBSD play > with X48 chipset? The drive enclosure obviously doesn't interact with > the OS, but I'd still like your opinion on it or maybe some > alternatives. Please let me know what you think. > > - Max > > Barebone: > Shuttle SX48P2 E > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16856101070 > > Raid Card: > 3ware 9690SA-8E-KIT > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816116062 > > SAS Enclosure: > RAIDAGE iAge840ML2 > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16816702014 > Ok, other components aside for now, I've been thinking about what video card to get. Since the raid controller will occupy one slot, and BBU another, I thought about using a usb video adapter. Can anyone please let me know if something like this is supported by FreeBSD: eVGA UV Plus USB VGA Adapter 100-U2-UV16-A1 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16815101001 - Max From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 16:49:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2A71065670 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C478E8FC2E for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (vpn-cl-164-142.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.164.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D078A000A for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:48:59 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4985D26E.9000604@bsdforen.de> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:48:46 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: request responsibility timeout X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:49:16 -0000 I want to request a responsibility timeout for bin/120784, I have submitted a patch matching the previously discussed criteria for a commit a couple of weeks ago and I would like to receive some kind of reaction. What is the appropriate channel to do so? Regards http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=120784 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 16:57:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA545106566B for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:57:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seba.bsd@sinux.net) Received: from smtp2.infomaniak.ch (smtp2.infomaniak.ch [84.16.68.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6958FC0C for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:57:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seba.bsd@sinux.net) Received: from [172.16.1.20] (217-162-55-198.dclient.hispeed.ch [217.162.55.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp2.infomaniak.ch (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n11Ggdg6001888 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:42:40 +0100 From: Sebastien Chassot To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:42:39 +0100 Message-Id: <1233506559.1023.16.camel@dhcppc0> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Mail Servers on smtp2 host X-Antivirus-Code: 100000 Subject: xorg 7.4 keyboard localisation (xorg.conf vs hal) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:57:24 -0000 Hi, I've upgrade to xorg7.4 and apparently keyboard and mouse are now working with hald. In xorg.conf changing "old" keybord config as no effect and I can't find how change it with hal. I've got /usr/local/etc/hal/fdi/* but no *keymap* and I don't know how build such a file. Thank you. -- [] [][][] Sebastien Chassot - Geneva (Switzerland) || From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 17:19:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E338106566C for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD698FC1C for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:19:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20090201171934.UMCH4080.mtaout02-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:19:34 +0000 Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org ([82.21.101.171]) by aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vG.2.02.00.01 201-2161-120-102-20060912) with ESMTP id <20090201171934.NMHK22934.aamtaout04-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@catflap.slightlystrange.org> for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:19:34 +0000 Received: by catflap.slightlystrange.org (Postfix, from userid 106) id C42DF6192; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:19:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from torus.slightlystrange.org (torus.slightlystrange.org [10.1.3.50]) by catflap.slightlystrange.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D874617A for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:19:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: by torus.slightlystrange.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:19:20 +0000 From: "Daniel Bye" Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 17:19:20 +0000 To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20090201171920.GB69316@torus.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <1233506559.1023.16.camel@dhcppc0> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1233506559.1023.16.camel@dhcppc0> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE i386 X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=qiI8-uaCwewA:10 a=RR1p26c16WEA:10 a=ehNlctqhnw0A:10 a=FgODDbkYyQeDhlkh7m0A:9 a=rK3nh9w81VHQYjXhNjbHO5ek7gsA:4 a=LY0hPdMaydYA:10 a=1TEtN6bcc7-6zMruUkUA:9 a=ukQx7kyeseVrXI8cTebgogxQL-wA:4 a=rPt6xJ-oxjAA:10 Subject: Re: xorg 7.4 keyboard localisation (xorg.conf vs hal) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 17:19:36 -0000 --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 05:42:39PM +0100, Sebastien Chassot wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I've upgrade to xorg7.4 and apparently keyboard and mouse are now > working with hald. >=20 > In xorg.conf changing "old" keybord config as no effect and I can't find > how change it with hal. I've got /usr/local/etc/hal/fdi/* but no > *keymap* and I don't know how build such a file. This should get you started: gb Change the `gb' in the example to your local keymap name, save the file as /usr/local/etc/hal/fdi/policy/x11-input.fdi and restart hald. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkmF2ZgACgkQixf5fBYiFmqPiQCgkur+8wHagyjT4nVfu3BGJIsR KHEAniE1xSnx/uCkG3gVLoxZPT0qb3l/ =R2FK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MfFXiAuoTsnnDAfZ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 18:26:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E2B106564A for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985BE8FC22 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54E3AFC1FE; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:26:19 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 09:26:00 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <4985D26E.9000604@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <4985D26E.9000604@bsdforen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902010926.00728.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Dominic Fandrey Subject: Re: request responsibility timeout X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:26:21 -0000 On Sunday 01 February 2009 07:48:46 Dominic Fandrey wrote: > I want to request a responsibility timeout for bin/120784, I have > submitted a patch matching the previously discussed criteria for > a commit a couple of weeks ago and I would like to receive some kind > of reaction. > > What is the appropriate channel to do so? -hackers -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 18:31:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6BC106564A for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com (mail-ew0-f21.google.com [209.85.219.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578AC8FC26 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:31:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so1958551ewy.19 for ; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:31:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OtrOUjm47+6+yhreJ1IOQ8hvhxQOy9pz46hncp62Vqc=; b=k5n9bs7fGmKVM+qjnLZXyo4fIS4KtdqshKKzVIddhyPDMIFdwLLJKRapGhPTBDIIiy DmVzu1ei8MAbh/c1nZdmL+RDVKR7WtorWx9a7UufjCl5H+NoLKJRBbgG5J6Nt2YJjBbJ pXVUiAgkG+iwONTc6hbTpABcouL1qs+38JRYI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ODCveTN6bG7OJX45M3wy3Vqkmrp3Fu7HPjGxSSX/vqNHbc72mJntpdDaqRDg3Te+eK UxG5dt+Pi10PDIXl9+9cg98iDP6bi/SiaNa6athUiDYGzpqpPzK/VslrXBJYXYFIDb/z EHo6HdJKfAKqeOvziAICeerF8xveEA9qZBy8Y= Received: by 10.210.42.13 with SMTP id p13mr265742ebp.87.1233513092199; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:31:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u14sm2911532gvf.19.2009.02.01.10.31.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:31:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:31:28 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090201183128.524f16db@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: dump(8) using snapshot + "recommended" cache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:31:34 -0000 On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:59:02 -0400 (AST) Andrew Hamilton-Wright wrote: > > Hi All; > > I regularly use dump(8) with snapshots to back up my server. > > While this seems to have been working perfectly well so far, > upon (re)reading the man page for dump(8), I have noticed a > somewhat scary pair of lines in the paragraph describing > the option for -C (emphasis with stars mine): > > [Use of this option] will greatly improve performance > at the cost of ***dump possibly not noticing changes in > the file system*** between passes. > > ***It is recommended that you always use this option when > dumping a snapshot.*** > When you dump a snapshot there are, by definition, no changes between passes. So it's saying that in that case there in no reason not to cache. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 18:47:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AEA7106566B for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C02C8FC0C for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n11IkW1w044527; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:46:44 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.1 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk n11IkW1w044527 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1233514005; bh=b1ZmyyBR9lutokoCYS3qQI1/05iXTE2IjXy6FAbkk+Q=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4985EE02.5030001@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20S un,=2001=20Feb=202009=2018:46:26=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.19=20(X11/20090125)|MIME-Vers ion:=201.0|To:=20Polytropon=20|CC:=20FreeBSD=20Q uestions=20|Subject:=20Re:=20Tool=2 0to=20uncat=20file|References:=20<20090201140102.e9a9a41a.freebsd@ edvax.de>|In-Reply-To:=20<20090201140102.e9a9a41a.freebsd@edvax.de >|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95.6|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B =20micalg=3Dpgp-sha256=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-sign ature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigDAC664FFC332328ECE7A E08D"; b=3ENHiGQwdo21+o87y42J0qf8OXYpm7evJHPC6XIundiHOFz1TwNp1HQO9Jvyg/R41 nhEGH6wgL2gnWluBTKYff0a3dAF4n5d8nHDaUjtr5LwDqevHcTWaRW2LtZJkDDx6ZC 6eQ9KGoGiQeIMdXr+o4ddf1fe/hFzZnLE78rEuXw= Message-ID: <4985EE02.5030001@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:46:26 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <20090201140102.e9a9a41a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20090201140102.e9a9a41a.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDAC664FFC332328ECE7AE08D" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:46:45 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/8935/Sun Feb 1 15:43:52 2009 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Tool to uncat file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:47:04 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDAC664FFC332328ECE7AE08D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Polytropon wrote: > Dear list, >=20 > before starting to code on my own, I'd like to ask if there's already a= > tool to uncat files, defining the file separation position as a string > of bytes, usually given in hexadecimal form. >=20 > An example could be this: >=20 > % uncat -p 0x12,0x52,0xf1,0x09 file_orig >=20 > It creates file_1 file_2 file_3. And, of course, >=20 > % cat file_1 file_2 file_3 > file_orig >=20 > would re-create the original file. The bytes 0x12,0x52,0xf1,0x09 tell t= he > file starting pattern (-p), where a new file begins. >=20 > I cannot use dd due to the fact that the files concatenated are of a > different size. So the idea would be to look for specific byte pattern > and then start a new file each time it occurs on input. >=20 > Is there such a tool, or any other ideas? csplit(1) Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigDAC664FFC332328ECE7AE08D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREIAAYFAkmF7ggACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxiVACbBn5/QUqoEik6LFxpyd9tCvdG +2IAoIhsVAm12CDZZldBI9PMElf1O2/K =KLBT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDAC664FFC332328ECE7AE08D-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 20:07:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6E7106564A for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:07:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from AHamiltonWright@MtA.ca) Received: from mailserv.mta.ca (mailserv.mta.ca [138.73.1.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F1898FC27 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from AHamiltonWright@MtA.ca) Received: from [138.73.29.51] (helo=qemg.org) by mailserv.mta.ca with esmtp (Exim 4.61) (envelope-from ) id 1LTibd-0006sB-R1; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:07:50 -0400 Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:08:47 -0400 (AST) From: Andrew Hamilton-Wright Sender: andrew@qemg.org To: RW In-Reply-To: <20090201183128.524f16db@gumby.homeunix.com> Message-ID: References: <20090201183128.524f16db@gumby.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dump(8) using snapshot + "recommended" cache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:07:52 -0000 On Sun, 1 Feb 2009, RW wrote: >> ***It is recommended that you always use this option when >> dumping a snapshot.*** > > > When you dump a snapshot there are, by definition, no changes between > passes. So it's saying that in that case there in no reason not to > cache. Ah, that makes sense. That being the case, perhaps we can update the text to: If dumping from a snapshot, the filesystem is already frozen, therefore using a cache with a snapshot will ensure that consistency is maintained while also providing best performance. If that sounds good, I'll make a doc patch. Out of curiosity, under what circumstances is the improved performance the most likely? I dump from cron when the system usage is low, and haven't noticed any significant difference in time with or without cacheing -- but I haven't done any testing under heavy load, nor with limited RAM, so there are many mbufs available in any case. Thanks for the info, Andrew. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 20:58:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84CA1065670; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:58:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667448FC26; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:58:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so479241yxb.13 for ; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:58:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ze7RSl4LFYBJNheswA+DQ73ZRAENPq2zKPSXUQc2bWw=; b=rBFyzaMlZZTguFYF8iHlMfRiTD6HOAnFMicNgg0bDtfscpjD1/KwaK2UhqVKgA9uMg sDyj7GvbOFxtW4KaAUq22kf601V6gvXiXQFFv+VZPD7CoJAWcWWXXjpfvFvTzgIjRqIe pmvOAMx1u3pGYXrVruy9kxZBNiEv3uJNF6lAA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=h1TKT55BEfYI8yLR4xQ8RmxjLVI41wIH2dOD2HNMSe/UsqHc+kg78v0xMRs/aFo5tJ 4Xh7XAIzV9kBlX9CLAvcbhVdeJTxft62loVakUq5RGDUOvnqw/PO/C6dtTCJ2fRqvvhK wXUj2yM48swP/8O3wzfpjl0KIZghn6lIVmSTg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.68.20 with SMTP id q20mr2254314aga.11.1233521902634; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:58:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4985877B.8080502@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <200901301430.07087.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <4984EF27.2050405@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <790a9fff0901312008x71fa025na58856bde4c7a5be@mail.gmail.com> <4985877B.8080502@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:58:22 -0600 Message-ID: <790a9fff0902011258j5f954ea9s2c9665c3bd8a5c61@mail.gmail.com> From: Scot Hetzel To: "O. Hartmann" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Mel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg upgrade desaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:58:24 -0000 On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 5:28 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > Scot Hetzel wrote: >> On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 6:39 PM, O. Hartmann >> wrote: >> >>> build-process, but I doubt this. I did a 'ldd' on the Firefox3 binary >>> and I got the attached dump of the linked shared objects. >>> Interestingly, the first three entries show up something missing - >>> therefore I deinstalled Firefox and rebuild the browser after an >>> additional rebuild of libxcb (via portupgrade -rf). Previously, all Xorg >>> >> >> >>> thor# ldd firefox-bin >>> firefox-bin: >>> libxul.so => not found (0x0) >>> libmozjs.so => not found (0x0) >>> libxpcom.so => not found (0x0) >>> libplds4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplds4.so.1 (0x80063e000) >>> libplc4.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libplc4.so.1 (0x80076f000) >>> >> >> When firefox3 was first added to the ports collection, I had noticed >> this problem with firefox3 (after using sysutils/libchk), but I didn't >> have this problem with the firefox 2. A look at the difference >> between the www/firefox and www/firefox3 Makefiles showed that >> firefox3 was missing this: >> >> LDFLAGS+= -Wl,-rpath,${PREFIX}/lib/${MOZ_RPATH} >> >> After adding this line to the ports Makefile, and rebuilding the port, >> these libraries are now showing as found in the ldd output. >> >> Scot >> > Isn't that worth a PR? > > Submitted and rejected: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=131237 As it doesn't affect the operation of Firefox3's firefox-bin program. Scot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 21:05:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3C210657B2 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B53E8FC17 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:05:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LTjV0-0005yN-Nn for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:05:02 +0000 Received: from 81.210.237.210 ([81.210.237.210]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:05:02 +0000 Received: from saper by 81.210.237.210 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:05:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Marcin Cieslak Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:49:00 +0100 Lines: 28 Message-ID: <49860ABC.1030205@system.pl> References: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.210.237.210 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090131 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 In-Reply-To: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> Sender: news Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg upgrade disaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:05:10 -0000 O. Hartmann wrote: > After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4 > and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now > firefox3 still doesn't work properly and hits me when starting with this > error message: > > Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". Looks like libraries (Xext among others) already support the XGE extension: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg/36483 but the current the 1.5 Xorg server does not support and the 1.6 release is behind schedule a bit: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Njg4OA I keep getting this error after upgrade of X today but everything works as usual. > Then firefox3 freezes forever, showing something like the background or > pixel remnants of windows/picograms moving over its window. The firefox problem is unrelated I think to the message above (as demonstrated later in the thred) --Marcin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 21:34:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B091065670 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:34:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from farremosen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com (mail-ew0-f21.google.com [209.85.219.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 288C98FC0A for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:34:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from farremosen@gmail.com) Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so2025523ewy.19 for ; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:34:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2ukxY3UPor5kWwe6pPcMtTS9z8ae553muwkQwGDPkHU=; b=YPUQuQfg4SlpVJEFoakCBr574u3viy0TntfJQEhJ07oACtusGJsQlhvTM+Gzw04e2n Ld+Uv2I49BljWMIrA0U907JNsvpa6aH1JG0T0oGb5J0FwiCjz5hfz/aNpjp8hmRpgXJL T68uTJKpnj3GkgoxjGIWcqzkxcE96YhfvQqL4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=FgxoUye9Peun5sDEj0nFgC6ir7c0Pm7uZ+bar6iiirV0h36w2+ZSx2MuCuy7GK04z5 dPR0vxWYr7V+EviKA6e1x/26827FsPKK1wlPRbM/5odSNnhqzVgbYIzJv2UXJ5DCHNBB +4xXMeYSqfaql6fieieg2NhzlmrsUpBt6B3PA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.111.4 with SMTP id j4mr89944ebc.1.1233524086181; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:34:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:34:46 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Klaus_Friis_=D8stergaard?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Problem gdm 2.24, xdmcp D-BUS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:34:47 -0000 On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 04:03:10PM +0100, Klaus Friis =D8stergaard wrot= e: I tried to remove the directories that was not removed by deinstall manually, and then installed again, now no complaints about not bei= ng able to uninstall I can now start gdm again, with out any complaint= s, but when I run sockstat I cannot see gdm-binary active nor any list= en on udp 177. Any suggestions? GDM 2.24 ist broken, not only on FreeBSD but also on other systems like Fedora. My personal workaround ist to keep using 2.20 for now, which seems to be the last working version that came from the gnome team. gdm-2.24.1_5 is not broken, else I couldn't have logged onto my gnome-desktop some minutes ago. But there are some feature-regressions compared to 2.20 - developers say they have rewritten important parts of the code. Greetings, Uli. Thanks, but how do I reverse back to gdm 2.20? Is this possible with the portupgrade tools? /Klaus --=20 Klaus F. =D8stergaard, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 22:07:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB961065670 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sales@internationalpropertydirectory.com) Received: from smtp111.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp111.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.37.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AB34A8FC18 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:07:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sales@internationalpropertydirectory.com) Received: (qmail 34179 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2009 21:40:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO CPE0014bff3e4d5-CM00152fc6e7c2.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) (sales@99.249.236.212 with login) by smtp111.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 1 Feb 2009 21:40:18 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: NLaxAHEVM1mZ7oA9.l9kq0u0a_9kYeyPXJvrgM7Q_EGPnBVmh7DQmh0tUUCLsrJoDw-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "International Property Directory" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/related; type="multipart/alternative"; boundary="----=_NextPart_001_2E2F_01A6206D.77021F38" X-Mailer: SendBlaster.1.5.5 Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 16:40:29 -0500 Message-ID: <444863973520529021572@ipd-office> X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Dear Freebsd-questions the Dubai Shopping Festival 2009 Special Offers are here - International Property Directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: sales@internationalpropertydirectory.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:07:04 -0000 ------=_NextPart_001_2E2F_01A6206D.77021F38 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dubai Shopping Festival 2009 Special Offers - International Property Direct= ory Dubai | United Arab Emirates =20 =20 Choose Your Language: Investors - purchase your property through our services and you can list an= d market your property FREE of charge to our growing database of buyers whe= n you wish to sell. Agent and Private Property Listings =20 Please forward this newsletter=20 If you know someone who might be interested in our latest newsletter please= click here to forward this email to up to 5 friends at once. =20 IMPORTANT: International Property Directory will never ask for any monies. All contrac= ts are issued directly and we will assist throughout the process and be on = hand for after sales services. =20 Dubai Shopping Festival 2009 Property Bonanza! =20 =20 =20 =20 International Property Directory are pleased to be able to bring an exclusi= ve selection of offers to investors and enthusiasts of the Dubai Property M= arket in celebration of the Dubai Shopping Festival 2009. Review the FREE 6 page brochure here To start your negotiations to get the very best deals on offer click here =20 =20 We work with the Developers - Directly! =20 =20 =20 Newsletter Sign up - Please sign-up an associate for the IPD Newsletter list Newsletter Removal - Please remove email from the IPD Newsletter list DISCLAIMER This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the= individual named. If you are not the named addressee, you should not disse= minate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediatel= y by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-m= ail from your system. This e-mail has been prepared using information belie= ved by the author to be reliable and accurate, but International Property D= irectory make no warranty as to its accuracy or completeness. Any opinions = expressed in this document are those of the author and do not necessarily r= eflect the opinions of International Property Directory. They maybe subject= to change without notice. International Property Directory do not accept r= esponsibility for changes made to this e-mail after it was sent. If verific= ation is required please request a hard-copy version. E-mail transmission c= annot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be inte= rcepted, lost, destroyed, corrupted, arrive late or incomplete, or contain = viruses. For information regarding our privacy policy please visit contact = us for further details. International Property Directory does not take rece= ipt of any monies or sign contracts with investors. We operate independentl= y, sourcing property investment opportunities for our interested parties. A= ll contracts and monies are always handled directly with the property devel= oper offering the property. We always recommend our investors seek Independ= ent legal and financial advice before purchasing a property. International = Property Directory can accept no liability for any damages or losses result= ing from the purchase of one our listed Investment Opportunities. International Property Directory is a Canadian registered company. Registered Address: London, Ontario, N6G 4V4, CANADA =A9 International Property Directory =20 =20 ------=_NextPart_001_2E2F_01A6206D.77021F38-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 22:32:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF815106566B for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613388FC1C for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from anne-o1dpaayth1.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA29008 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:07:49 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200902012207.PAA29008@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:07:43 -0700 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: Subject: IPFW in-kernel NAT: How to compile? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 22:32:18 -0000 All: I'm building a machine using FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE, and noticed that there was now a kernel configuration option to enable in-kernel NAT in IPFW. So, starting with a pristine system, I tried to rebuild the kernel with this feature as I trimmed out the unneeded device drivers. But the build failed -- and the error messages suggest that the problem had to do with linking libalias into the kernel. libalias seems to be there, so I'm not sure what's wrong. Ideas? --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 23:13:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855D6106564A for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ipfreak@yahoo.com) Received: from web52104.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web52104.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.48.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 142D88FC37 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:13:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ipfreak@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 41652 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Feb 2009 22:46:48 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=v1VzuelrCiO5jJjuycxmkBkBylTE3/eGbEgcGfv8SxQNETB0wLF/EDRU2ADaNwu+yY3B86dZomEpDnDYVCKsBcOzCAo3UdwIxBYVoYJXTRD3RPf1FfY6XOblBPwkiZ0sURtH/RFpwQPfb9P5lips1pRenreaUbfd77pDU49pQU8=; X-YMail-OSG: MOpY3esVM1kW.KofZfhqdUMKoR5EeEZ_NuIUahC2M2YvRKsPo8XAQgzyG9uIJCp5esIwXiTDZuCo5G0fFtPQoltJ8MZrAULLCaTP17dojIwMIwcrzO_Fth3aAy1FrFVm3mmBw5KzXaJEc48prEFWlcHq4va.HXE07V4xqz7ADLzucGpVX2MXrkAlTgL0 Received: from [98.169.13.4] by web52104.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:46:48 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 14:46:48 -0800 (PST) From: gahn To: freebsd general questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <613985.35234.qm@web52104.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Subject: freebsd and multicasting software X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ipfreak@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:13:30 -0000 Hi, all: Does anyone know multicasting packages (udp based) that I can test on the freebsd? I am using 6.3 and it comes with vlc-0.8.6i and doesn't support udp streaming. Any help would be greatly appreciated.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 23:14:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FA4106567A for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:14:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF348FC26 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:14:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id n11NE05J023937 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:14:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id n11NE0Sn023936; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:14:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA05678; Sun, 1 Feb 09 15:03:25 PST Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:04:51 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk, freebsd@edvax.de Message-Id: <49862a93.mPk92H+6FBE9Dl8m%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20090201140102.e9a9a41a.freebsd@edvax.de> <4985EE02.5030001@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4985EE02.5030001@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tool to uncat file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:14:18 -0000 > > before starting to code on my own, I'd like to ask if there's > > already a tool to uncat files, defining the file separation > > position as a string of bytes, usually given in hexadecimal form. > > > > An example could be this: > > > > % uncat -p 0x12,0x52,0xf1,0x09 file_orig > > > > It creates file_1 file_2 file_3. And, of course, > > > > % cat file_1 file_2 file_3 > file_orig > > > > would re-create the original file. The bytes 0x12,0x52,0xf1,0x09 > > tell the file starting pattern (-p), where a new file begins. > > > > I cannot use dd due to the fact that the files concatenated are > > of a different size ... > > csplit(1) csplit would cover the case where the input file is text, to be split on line boundaries based on patterns found within the lines; but the example given looks like a binary pattern and my reading of the inquiry is that the split should occur at the pattern rather than at a nearby newline. Grepping the ports INDEX for "split" yields the following candidates which might bear examination, to see if any of them will work: misc/granulate sysutils/gfslicer sysutils/hoz sysutils/lxsplit From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 23:19:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F101F106564A for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eitanadlerlist@gmail.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4A58FC1E for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eitanadlerlist@gmail.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so1255602wfg.7 for ; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:19:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1kOH5VklNBYDm/WmSJXhuh4D7/pg3UXxZI9CipTLnGQ=; b=iZvk3qdzc32aQa7Q5oyBREAqqLeTwqrFZz4P8datzoM69n0IZjdjRa/vktlSmvxj7e fM7A2FZ+Jm99NGgrb+MzJYl551hhHIrOOW2eTJ5XQ4/1/ac4Ygz+H1LwJTpbDOHDG9pE H5yaHjFE/2dUbkD9xMzFfVzp6t/QR1SA+2HQU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=UOK6tVcx146ZjNo8svrez1umT9FSrgxcvaPziHrZUBxBvQ+uyTVgrZp6Vc2DTcJHAo 7YdAYfNd5c+11CuCB6Lp6xgSzZ5qo88LU5AoSXIsWXnQYTIrLxwdQO8lrct0g2tmrYd7 qmcJh1v1xVWvhb+EvUhJOLFSj+b7lZ0GCkToI= Received: by 10.143.42.6 with SMTP id u6mr1553977wfj.121.1233530353390; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:19:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from aargh.lan (ool-182fcc8b.dyn.optonline.net [24.47.204.139]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm4835993wfg.25.2009.02.01.15.19.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 01 Feb 2009 15:19:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49862DEE.4050000@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:19:10 -0500 From: Eitan Adler User-Agent: Mozilla (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; ) Gecko Thunderbird Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <20090201140102.e9a9a41a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20090201140102.e9a9a41a.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=E9C2CCD1; url=pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Tool to uncat file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:19:14 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > Dear list, > > before starting to code on my own, I'd like to ask if there's already a > tool to uncat files, defining the file separation position as a string > of bytes, usually given in hexadecimal form. > > Is there such a tool, or any other ideas? If I understand correctly you are looking for split(1). -p pattern The file is split whenever an input line matches pattern, which is interpreted as an extended regular expression. The matching line will be the first line of the next output file. This option is incompatible with the -b and -l options. -- Eitan Adler "Security is increased by designing for the way humans actually behave." -Jakob Nielsen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 01:12:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE03C106566B for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:12:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759058FC1F for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:12:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan-a.emsphone.com [199.67.51.107]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n120hkr2089628 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:43:46 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n120hkkh056480 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:43:46 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n120hiY4056479; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:43:44 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:43:44 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Brett Glass Message-ID: <20090202004344.GH75802@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200902012207.PAA29008@lariat.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200902012207.PAA29008@lariat.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.1, clamav-milter version 0.94.1 on email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:43:46 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW in-kernel NAT: How to compile? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:12:42 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 01), Brett Glass said: > I'm building a machine using FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE, and noticed that there > was now a kernel configuration option to enable in-kernel NAT in IPFW. > So, starting with a pristine system, I tried to rebuild the kernel with > this feature as I trimmed out the unneeded device drivers. But the build > failed -- and the error messages suggest that the problem had to do with > linking libalias into the kernel. > > libalias seems to be there, so I'm not sure what's wrong. Ideas? Do you have "options LIBALIAS" in your kernel config? -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 01:13:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E34641065679 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D538FC1E for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from anne-o1dpaayth1.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA00512; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:12:56 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200902020112.SAA00512@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:12:51 -0700 To: Dan Nelson From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <20090202004344.GH75802@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200902012207.PAA29008@lariat.net> <20090202004344.GH75802@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW in-kernel NAT: How to compile? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 01:13:04 -0000 At 05:43 PM 2/1/2009, Dan Nelson wrote: >Do you have "options LIBALIAS" in your kernel config? Nope. There was nothing that said that such an option was needed (or even that it existed). I did find it, via a recursive grep, in a file labeled "NOTES" a couple of levels up in the directory hierarchy. I'm trying a compile now to see if that's all that's needed to fix the problem. It looks as if there's no longer one easy place to find out how to configure a kernel. The options used to all be in a LINT file that was present in the configuration directory.... No more. --Brett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 02:47:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9983106566B for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4BA8FC17 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 02:47:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n122l6el094823 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:47:16 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200902020247.n122l6el094823@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:47:06 -0600 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Looking for a Good FreeBSD and General Unix Backup System X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 02:47:28 -0000 After all the good suggestions by several people from this list, I think we will go with dump and restore. I used to use dump around ten years ago when our departmental Unix work station was a Sun and I don't ever remember it letting us down, even after something dreadful happened to the main drive and I had to rebuild it. There turns out to be a dump package for Linux which should give us the coverage we were looking for. The scripts I set up for doing backups are much smaller and easier to maintain with dump with the idea being that a shell script determines whether this is week 1 through 5 in a given month. The first day of that week is Level 0 followed by 6 more levels until we start another week such that the path to a backup looks like 02-1/systemname/systemname_0 systemname_1 and so forth. The defaults appear to be slightly different between the bsd dump and Linux's dump, but it wasn't difficult to get both to dump one volume containing all the inodes to a file which is actually a named pipe on the backup server. Many thanks to all. Martin McCormick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 03:41:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A03E11065670 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:41:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5642D8FC08 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:41:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan-a.emsphone.com [199.67.51.107]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n123fLpP005391 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:41:21 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n123fK8C082169 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:41:21 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n123fJVO082160; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:41:19 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:41:19 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Brett Glass Message-ID: <20090202034118.GI75802@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200902012207.PAA29008@lariat.net> <20090202004344.GH75802@dan.emsphone.com> <200902020112.SAA00512@lariat.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200902020112.SAA00512@lariat.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.1, clamav-milter version 0.94.1 on email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:41:21 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW in-kernel NAT: How to compile? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 03:41:22 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 01), Brett Glass said: > At 05:43 PM 2/1/2009, Dan Nelson wrote: > > >Do you have "options LIBALIAS" in your kernel config? > > Nope. There was nothing that said that such an option was needed > (or even that it existed). I did find it, via a recursive grep, in > a file labeled "NOTES" a couple of levels up in the directory > hierarchy. I'm trying a compile now to see if that's all that's > needed to fix the problem. > > It looks as if there's no longer one easy place to find out how to > configure a kernel. The options used to all be in a LINT file that > was present in the configuration directory.... No more. LINT was removed back in 2000 and replaced with NOTES, since that better describes what it's really used for. IPFIREWALL_NAT and LIBALIAS should additionally be documented in ipfw(4) imho. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 04:12:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A49106566C for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:12:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from lariat.net (lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627598FC19 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:12:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from anne-o1dpaayth1.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@lariat.net [66.119.58.2]) by lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA01893; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:12:08 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200902020412.VAA01893@lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 21:12:08 -0700 To: Dan Nelson From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <20090202034118.GI75802@dan.emsphone.com> References: <200902012207.PAA29008@lariat.net> <20090202004344.GH75802@dan.emsphone.com> <200902020112.SAA00512@lariat.net> <20090202034118.GI75802@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW in-kernel NAT: How to compile? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 04:12:17 -0000 At 08:41 PM 2/1/2009, Dan Nelson wrote: >LINT was removed back in 2000 and replaced with NOTES, since that better >describes what it's really used for. IPFIREWALL_NAT and LIBALIAS should >additionally be documented in ipfw(4) imho. Indeed they should. I'm not a committer, or I'd add the information. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 04:20:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C668C106566C for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fanreach@reverbnation.com) Received: from fanreach2.reverbnation.com (fanreach2.reverbnation.com [64.151.83.142]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2DD38FC1F for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:20:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fanreach@reverbnation.com) Received: from aretha.reverbnation.com (fanreach2.reverbnation.com [64.151.83.142]) by fanreach2.reverbnation.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B939FDD9C8C for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:01:26 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=reverbnation.com; c=nofws; q=dns; b=pKgxcrhdv+wbdmjl3OeRlYadNotCVq7tPruLdBKHvkzzL5zY+9PvapJcyEl61AHsI zoWbyZRpqqkH1AQLPrNkX5Ci4qef1awaJfErqfoAkrERnb4RkFTPgg41IioDD6PGF0w 0ETyfuNV/EwwmBtMugI11hkO3BLc2GbX2hi+FOI= From: MIXSHOWBLAST To: questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 23:01:26 -0500 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Confirmation Message from MIXSHOWBLAST X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 04:20:24 -0000 questions@freebsd.org, You are receiving this message because of your relationship with the artist 'MIXSHOWBLAST': "We recently switched mail servers, and are required to send out this courtesy re-confirmation email. You don't need to do anything to remain on our mailing list. You will be receiving updates from us soon, so stay tuned!" Your options: [1]Confirm my email so that I will be eligible for any exclusives from MIXSHOWBLAST [2]Unsubscribe from this list [3]Report Spam or Abuse _________________________________________________________________ [fanreach_logo_white_94x22.png] [powered_by_reverbnation.png] This email sent through FanReach from ReverbNation. MIXSHOWBLAST have indicated that you have requested this information. ReverbNation.com: 501 Washington St., Suite J, Durham NC 27701 [4] Update Contact Info [5] Unsubscribe [6] Report Abuse [7] Privacy References 1. http://www.reverbnation.com/c./a1/label_12232?eid=1398434_13494323&fid=13494323&fsc=d706ee2b860&action_code=opt_in 2. http://www.reverbnation.com/c./fr2/label_12232?eid=1398434_13494323&fid=13494323&fsc=d706ee2b860 3. http://www.reverbnation.com/?popup_render=%2Fc.%2Ffr1%2Flabel_12232%3Feid%3D1398434_13494323%26fid%3D13494323%26fsc%3Dd706ee2b860 4. http://www.reverbnation.com/c./a1/label_12232?eid=1398434_13494323&fid=13494323&fsc=d706ee2b860 5. http://www.reverbnation.com/c./fr2/label_12232?eid=1398434_13494323&fid=13494323&fsc=d706ee2b860 6. http://www.reverbnation.com/?popup_render=%2Fc.%2Ffr1%2Flabel_12232%3Feid%3D1398434_13494323%26fid%3D13494323%26fsc%3Dd706ee2b860 7. http://www.reverbnation.com/c./cms/PrivacyPolicy?layout=popup&display=view_popup From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 04:33:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD9D106566C for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CECB8FC13 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:33:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.183]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04213536108; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 00:33:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.183]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 88234-01; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 00:33:40 -0400 (AST) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (blk-11-106-204.eastlink.ca [76.11.106.204]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id DA4505360FB; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 00:33:39 -0400 (AST) Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:33:38 -0400 From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <84467B60728CC902BB853C9B@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <4984583C.2030409@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20090131091825.R90262@hub.org> <4984583C.2030409@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Load balancing multiple virtual hosts on 1 IP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 04:33:42 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thank you for all the responses ... turns out the solution was simplier ... I tried the various solutions presented, and each of them did the same thing ... The setup I have, I'm using csync2 to maintain the file systems on each backend, and in order to simplify that, I'm using: instead of which works fine ... *but*, something gets confused when you mix-n-match the above ... its either all of one or the other, but not both ... once I fixed my config files, the pages now load consistently ... Thank you all for the help on this, the pointers to the other software(s) provided "proof" that it wasn't the software, but my configuration ... - --On Saturday, January 31, 2009 13:55:08 +0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> >> Simple: is it possible? >> >> I have two VMs that contain the same content, on two different IPs .. I >> want to setup a third VM with something like haproxy on it that will >> take the URL (http://domain1) and pull the content from one or the other >> ... >> >> So far, all works well if I only have one virtual host, but as soon as I >> add a second one (http://domain2), when I try to go to http://domain2, >> it pulls up the content for domain1 also, as if I was going to http://IP >> instead. >> >> Is there a way to set this up (with haproxy, or some other software), >> that it will actually pass the URL through to the backend apache server >> and load up the right content? Or is this a limitation in the protocol >> itself?/ > > This is certainly possible -- most of the world's big web sites work in > exactly this way, although they would tend to use dedicated hardware LB > if they were of any appreciable size. > > I think what's going wrong for you is that you are using a front-end proxy, > and it's rewriting the requests with the host names of the real servers, > which will certainly screw up name based virtual hosts. > > Instead of ha-proxy, look into relayd -- in conjunction with a pf(4) > firewall this will do exactly what you want. It can operate purely at the > IP level or even at layer 2 if you want to implement DSR. Another > alternative to consider is varnish, although I'm not sure that has much > in the way of health-checking the back-end servers behind it. varnish > is a reverse-proxy / web accelerator so can give you some performance > boost as well. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW > - -- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. (http://www.hub.org) Email . scrappy@hub.org MSN . scrappy@hub.org Yahoo . yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ . 7615664 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkmGd6IACgkQ4QvfyHIvDvOlzwCfT5CpD8LdE4MlMD4ugmjP8tTC Z0YAoOl6F83j4t4WqTFqfQVutKLMQUj1 =fEn7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 04:57:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99901106564A for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:57:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:0:6:209:87:239:66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BAC8FC13 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 04:57:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from anton.digitaltorque.ca (hs-216-106-102-70.storm.ca [216.106.102.70]) by mail.storm.ca (8.14.2+Sun/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n122KxmB023123 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:21:04 -0500 (EST) Received: by anton.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4A21C860096; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:20:54 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:20:54 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20090202022053.GA18424@anton.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: Subject: problems building Parse::RecDescent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 04:57:00 -0000 --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm trying to build p5-Apache-MP3-4.00 from ports. I had it installed and working, but it recently stopped working so I'm rebuilding it. Unfortunately I'm having build problems. =3D=3D=3D> Building for p5-Ogg-Vorbis-Header-0.03_1 cp Header.pm blib/lib/Ogg/Vorbis/Header.pm /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.9 -Mblib -MInline=3DNOISY,_INSTALL_ -MOgg::Vorbis::H= eader -e1 0.03 blib/arch Starting Build Prepocess Stage Finished Build Prepocess Stage Starting Build Parse Stage This innvocation of Inline requires the Parse::RecDescent module. Can't locate version.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/ports/audio/p5-Ogg-Vorbis-Header/work/Ogg-Vorbis-Header-0.03/blib/arch /usr/ports/audio/p5-Ogg-Vorbis-Header/work/Ogg-Vorbis-Header-0.03/blib/arch /usr/ports/audio/p5-Ogg-Vorbis-Header/work/Ogg-Vorbis-Header-0.03/blib/lib /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9 .) at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/Parse/RecDescent.pm line 1722. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/Parse/RecDescent.pm line 1722. Compilation failed in require at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/Inline/C/ParseRecDescent.pm line 14. at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/Inline/C.pm line 322 INIT failed--call queue aborted. *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/audio/p5-Ogg-Vorbis-Header/work/Ogg-Vorbis-Header-0.03. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/audio/p5-Ogg-Vorbis-Header. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/p5-Apache-MP3. Any suggestions? Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFJhliFKGqCc1vIvggRAnE1AKCLyz5ZjKNdTVyCOYNkn3jIWvEwfwCgqUL1 drOwITdyBy9BER/dqM7XeMM= =6b62 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 05:03:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2488E1065690 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:03:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from kermit.lizardhill.com (kermit7.lizardhill.com [64.69.41.223]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41168FC39 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 05:03:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@lizardhill.com) Received: from ip68-224-43-222.lv.lv.cox.net ([68.224.43.222] helo=mickey) by kermit.lizardhill.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1LTqhN-0004WE-5Y for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:46:17 -0800 From: "Don O'Neil" To: Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:46:17 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 thread-index: AcmE8S+IcNP3Q+uNQiW2BWCLMAH0Ag== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 Subject: Vinum/FreeBSD 6.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 05:03:11 -0000 Are there any disk size/volume size limitations on Vinum with FreeBSD 6.4? Can I run Vinum on 4 500 G drives and get a 1Tbyte RAID10 config? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 06:56:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004481065678 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 06:56:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@maydias.com) Received: from smtp.po.exetel.com.au (pecan.exetel.com.au [220.233.0.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A798FC41 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 06:56:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@maydias.com) Received: from 196.43.96.58.exetel.com.au ([58.96.43.196] helo=enterprise.blackthorn.nu) by smtp.po.exetel.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1LTsir-0003D6-9F for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:55:59 +1100 Message-ID: <498698F9.1030204@maydias.com> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:55:53 +1000 From: Warren Liddell User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Error compiling Imagmagick X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:56:03 -0000 Im running AMD64 4gig RAM FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE, ports an src are all up to date... Below is the error output trying to compile imagmagick as part of the dependency whilst installing DVDrip ===================== cd PerlMagick && make CC='cc -std=gnu99' test /bin/sh ../magick.sh PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.9 "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/bzlib/*.t t/fpx/*.t t/jbig/*.t t/jpeg/*.t t/jp2/*.t t/png/*.t t/tiff/*.t t/x11/*.t t/zlib/*.t t/blob............ok t/bzlib/read......ok t/bzlib/write.....ok t/composite.......ok t/filter..........ok t/fpx/read........ok t/fpx/write.......ok t/getattribute....ok t/jbig/read.......ok t/jbig/write......ok t/jp2/read........ok t/jpeg/read.......ok t/jpeg/write......ok t/montage.........ok t/png/read-16.....ok t/png/read........ok t/png/write-16....ok t/png/write.......ok t/read............ok t/setattribute....ok t/tiff/read.......ok t/tiff/write......ok t/write...........ok t/x11/read........No protocol specified t/x11/read........ok t/x11/write.......No protocol specified t/x11/write....... Failed 1/2 subtests t/zlib/read.......ok t/zlib/write......ok Test Summary Report ------------------- t/x11/write (Wstat: 0 Tests: 2 Failed: 1) Failed test: 1 Files=27, Tests=345, 8 wallclock secs ( 0.32 usr 0.10 sys + 5.52 cusr 1.16 csys = 7.09 CPU) Result: FAIL Failed 1/27 test programs. 1/345 subtests failed. *** Error code 255 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/work/ImageMagick-6.4.8-3/PerlMagick. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/work/ImageMagick-6.4.8-3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/work/ImageMagick-6.4.8-3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/work/ImageMagick-6.4.8-3. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/multimedia/dvdrip. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 08:30:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C7D1065674 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:30:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E188FC19 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id d26so154553eyd.7 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:30:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=torLW1jvqCbAnBtnuMY3nLiqqUYKTms7jskaSZvw5Qk=; b=oQeqrWribK/Iz5VnL/4UUTX0riRE0qA5KUp9OhxGJkb3NPpTrHeHk/rN+2HPpUW7Js j439sheZpeCHXQCDMAUs+yjtjt2CpxMTOvyBnO0RNTFkuJuJRNwNRrPtBCaXREh1w18d k5a/LVowBlG0BW/dYrxXhS5WuaSbW7kz69pIY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=X8pEjTddoIWQytLt7t9DierUSf+WoBSaVOUBHGI+05P93oQYP6T76fZk0y+T3ZWNZf HYBMyLvFW2cJpoLComN1XHOl9iZNhhzp24f7RmZZaDsFioIPCpmVU6XbWI9maOQT/HQ4 NqfsnN2ZqD6/aaVvNdKMUVO2nFUC5Mtzb/K1M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.13.17 with SMTP id 17mr2311448ebm.130.1233563452702; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:30:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:30:52 +0100 Message-ID: <1bd550a00902020030q418d3dard3182490496f706e@mail.gmail.com> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Screen problem on booting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:30:54 -0000 Hi all, I'm using FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p2 Since a few days I've noticed something weird. On booting, all the text I see is shifted to the left, so I lose the first ten letters or so in every line of text. After login, once I type "startx" the X Window system seems to be OK _and_ if I go back to a console with Alt-Ctrl-Fn the console is fine again. My graphic card is an ATI Radeon HD2400. Anybody noticed it? Thanks in advance. PS: In console mode, reset command doesn't fix the problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 08:49:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247C3106567F for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seba.bsd@sinux.net) Received: from smtp1.infomaniak.ch (smtp1.infomaniak.ch [84.16.68.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9B28FC08 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seba.bsd@sinux.net) Received: from [172.16.1.20] (217-162-55-198.dclient.hispeed.ch [217.162.55.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.infomaniak.ch (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n128noBe019779 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:49:51 +0100 From: Sebastien Chassot To: Joe Kelsey In-Reply-To: <49861DEA.6050000@zircon.seattle.wa.us> References: <1233506559.1023.16.camel@dhcppc0> <20090201171920.GB69316@torus.slightlystrange.org> <1233510597.1023.20.camel@dhcppc0> <49861DEA.6050000@zircon.seattle.wa.us> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:49:50 +0100 Message-Id: <1233564590.1039.14.camel@dhcppc0> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Mail Servers on smtp1 host X-Antivirus-Code: 100000 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: xorg 7.4 keyboard localisation (xorg.conf vs hal) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:49:55 -0000 On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 14:10 -0800, Joe Kelsey wrote: > This seems to have a way to enable HAL to detect a keyboard and export > it to X, but what about mice? My Xorg log tells me that it is ignoring > my USB mouse in addition to ignoring my keyboard, so what sort of HAL > file do I add to enable it to find my mouse? You can choose between using HAL config or xorg.conf by doing what /usr/port/UPDATING suggest: =================== 20090123: AFFECTS: users of x11-servers/xorg-server AUTHOR: rnoland@FreeBSD.org If you are using an older xorg.conf several config lines are no longer needed and will generate warnings when X is started. RgbPath will cause X to fail to start, remove it from your config. Server 1.5.3 also really wants to configure its input devices via hald. This is causing some issues with moused and /dev/sysmouse. There are a couple of options for how to deal with it. 1. Add Option "AllowEmptyInput" "off" to your ServerLayout section. This will cause X to use the configured kbd, mouse, and vmmouse sections from your xorg.conf 2. Don't use moused. If you want it to work with addon usb mice set this in rc.conf: moused_enable="NO" moused_nondefault_enable="NO" I'm working on fixing hald or the mouse driver or both. =================== But it don't help on HAL support... > Where in HAL documentation is this information found? R. Noland seemed > to think it was a trivial process to make HAL do keyboards and mice? In > fact it is not trivial but a pain in the ass! If you intend to inflict > broken software on unsuspecting users you had better think through all > of the problems and come up with explicit solutions to all of those > problems so that everyone has a chance to make their systems work. You're right. The handbook don't talk about HAL at all and it's quiet difficult to find doc on web. HAL seems to have huge capability...too much to begin with... ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 08:57:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24EE1065670 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:57:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Apitz@oclc.org) Received: from mail.pica.nl (mail.pica.nl [192.87.44.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607F58FC18 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:57:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Apitz@oclc.org) Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de ([10.0.1.29]) by mail.pica.nl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:57:45 +0100 Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id n128veW6004913 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:57:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to matthias.apitz@oclc.org using -f Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:57:40 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090202085740.GA4654@rebelion.Sisis.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE (i386) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2009 08:57:45.0412 (UTC) FILETIME=[508E6840:01C98514] Subject: no cats at home, but system (7.0-STABLE) reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 08:57:48 -0000 Hello, I'm alone in my flat and have no cats :-) Last night I powered down my laptop (with the power-off button), the system went down, but later re-booted by its own: Feb 1 23:04:08 rebelion ipmon[839]: 23:04:08.145552 6x iwi0 @0:26 b 127.0.0.1,0 -> 0.0.0.0,0 PR tcp len 20 40 -AR OUT Feb 1 23:06:24 rebelion acpi: resumed at 20090201 23:06:24 Feb 1 23:06:31 rebelion ipmon[839]: 23:06:31.680826 iwi0 @0:26 b 192.168.2.3,138 -> 192.168.2.255,138 PR udp len 20 241 OUT broadcast Feb 1 23:06:33 rebelion root: /etc/rc.shutdown: WARNING: $gnugk_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Feb 1 23:06:33 rebelion syslogd: exiting on signal 15 Feb 1 23:42:42 rebelion syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel Feb 1 23:42:42 rebelion kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project. Feb 1 23:42:42 rebelion kernel: Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 Then the kernel was up for two hours until the laptop has run out of battery: Feb 1 23:42:42 rebelion kernel: Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad4s1a Feb 1 23:42:42 rebelion kernel: IP Filter: v4.1.28 initialized. Default = pass all, Logging = enabled Feb 1 23:42:42 rebelion savecore: no dumps found Feb 1 23:42:42 rebelion root: /etc/rc: WARNING: $gnugk_enable is not set properly - see rc.conf(5). Feb 2 01:42:52 rebelion kernel: battery0: critically low charge! Any ideas what could have caused that reboot after 36 minutes? The box has no Ethernet attached (only wireless). Thx matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.oclc.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 09:32:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D57106566C for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmaster@uni-altai.ru) Received: from mx1-ttk.uni-altai.ru (mx1-ttk.uni-altai.ru [81.1.237.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147038FC22 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmaster@uni-altai.ru) Received: from bspu.secna.ru (mail2.uni-altai.ru [10.250.2.12]) by mx1-ttk.uni-altai.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n1297w34048742 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:07:58 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from wmaster@uni-altai.ru) Received: from physics.uni-altai.ru (phys-bb1.uni-altai.ru [10.1.16.2]) by bspu.secna.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n12987DJ034007 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:08:07 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from wmaster@uni-altai.ru) Received: from castle.physfac.uni-altai.ru (zerg.physfac.uni-altai.ru [10.2.0.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by physics.uni-altai.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n12981vh000888 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:08:02 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from wmaster@uni-altai.ru) Message-ID: <4986B7EE.6060103@uni-altai.ru> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:07:58 +0600 From: Alexander Wolf Organization: BSPU User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000100070903020001070709" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2-exp, clamav-milter version 0.94.2-exp on main.uni-altai.ru X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.92.1, clamav-milter version 0.92.1 on bspu.secna.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: apt of freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: wmaster@uni-altai.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:32:37 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000100070903020001070709 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm find into /usr/ports/sysutils/apt porting from Debian APT. How to using this on FreeBSD? -- With best regards, Alexander Wolf --------------000100070903020001070709-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 09:37:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233F41065702 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:37:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45768FC17 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:37:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (vpn-cl-167-41.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [141.3.167.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9798A000B; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:36:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4986BE9E.90905@bsdforen.de> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:36:30 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090110) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Antonio Rieser References: <58a2fd890901311924s6bf36cb5w47d845d8d8090af8@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <58a2fd890901311924s6bf36cb5w47d845d8d8090af8@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rhurlin , Glen Barber , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Vulpes Velox Subject: Re: Graphics tablet / Xorg / mouse problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:37:19 -0000 Antonio Rieser wrote: > Hi, > > I recently installed FreeBSD 7.1 on an ACER Aspire > 1680 laptop. I'm running KDE 3.5 and the most recent Xorg port with a > Wacom Bamboo tablet and the wacom driver from the ports collection. I > have the following problems with the tablet and mouse: ... Just to keep you up to date, Bartosz is on it. Of course, I cannot give you a schedule. With the involvement of hald things seem to get much more complicated. It might be a temporary solution to deactivate hald support. Regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 09:41:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36496106564A for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from do-966-4030682-388176-17--freebsd-questions.freebsd.org@return.do06.net) Received: from pm49-95.do02.net (pm49-95.do02.net [80.118.49.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABA398FC14 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from do-966-4030682-388176-17--freebsd-questions.freebsd.org@return.do06.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=dk; d=videobrokers.com; h=Message-Id:Reply-To:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Unsubscribe:From:To:Date:Subject; i=info@videobrokers.com; bh=9xdfrGtKh/w/YkngUUmXC3xXsfk=; b=VcwqCMA97YKpMiH3k9GlXhJaq9TR5AJ01lSu4LD3AocADmBv2C/SI1VVsbi1l5+Omd6Bn5hldPv6 7gw4rfV8p54KurbfGhknPshA3vEw+ze1zRjLDtPJWA4M77FBA2kWx+ILtShkWDZlq1vAnoGbe+9W 0xDmK+1JjsaSgUSpUp0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=dk; d=videobrokers.com; b=zGj+ZLKVBJuy5FRxji67gEocX748Z6w/PG5E8xsz+joT3q8f0E//M5QiDhfMsEV5LXYfUH03zxK/ 2jieH7eRb2FCWv4QmOVcj4ugR5T2VOZjK40PxBKsRiOla/fVoH1ZJWsW52IsIkxSQzRe8gt5ttRO UGORklUljpLGF7RQMvY=; Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CAMPAIGN-ID: 966-4030682-388176 X-Mailer: DO v966.b4030682.c388176 From: "Video Brokers" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:30:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Second hand video equipment for sale. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Video Brokers List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:41:08 -0000 [1]WWW.VIDEOBROKERS.COM WE BUY & SALE USED VIDEO/BROADCAST EQUIPMENTS! Hello, Please find bellow some details regarding the equipment we have for sale at the moment. Do not hesitate to get in touch with us if what you are looking for is not listed here, let us know as well what you have for sale. VISION MIXER's : Sony DVS2000, 10 SDI inputs @ 5.000 Euros Sony DVS2000, 16 SDI inputs @ 7.000 Euros Abekas A8150, SDI @ 3.000 Euros BTS DD20, specs on request @ 8.000 Euros BTS DD30, specs on request @ 10.000 Euros BTS DD35, specs on request @ 14.000 Euros GVG 1200, SDI @ 5.000 Euros GVG 4000, specs on request @ 4.000 Euros GVG Kayak DD1, full options @21.000 Euros GVG Kayak HD200 & HD300, specs on request @ contact us for a quote Sony DVS7250 & 7350, specs on request @ contact us for a quote VTR's : Panasonic AJ-D230H, 200 original drum hours @ 1.100 Euros Panasonic AJ-D650E, 2400 original drum hours @ 1.000 Euros Panasonic AJ-D650E, with SDI, new drum "0hrs" @ 2.500 Euros Panasonic AJ-D950E, 2500 original drum hours @ 6.000 Euros Panasonic AJ-D960E, 1000 drum hours @ 7.000 Euros Panasonic AJLT-75E, 1500 original drum hours @5.500 Euros Panasonic AJLT95, new drum "0hrs" @ 9.000 Euros Panasonic AJHD1200E, 1200 original drum hours @ 9.000 Euros Panasonic AJHD1400E, 280 original drum hours @ 16.500 Euros Sony UVW1200P, details on request @ from 400 Euros Sony UVW1600P, details on request @ from 700 Euros Sony UVW1800P, details on request @ from 1.000 Euros Sony PVW2600P, details on request @ from 800 Euros Sony PVW2650P, new drum "0hrs" @ 1.500 Euros Sony PVW2800P, serviced @ 2.000 Euros Sony BVW60P, details on request @ from 400 Euros Sony BVW65P, details on request @ from 400 Euros Sony BVW70P, details on request @ from 2.000 Euros Sony BVW70P with SDI, 800 drum hours @ 2.800 Euros Sony BVW75P, details on request @ from 2.000 Euros Sony BVWD75P, 310 drum hours @ 2.800 Euros Sony DSR1P, 59 original drum hours @ 1.900 Euros Sony DSR40P, 680 original drum hours @ 1.900 Euros Sony DSR45P, 800 original drum hours @ 2.500 Euros Sony DSR60P, 900 drum hours @ 600 Euros Sony DSR80P, with SDI, 2600 original drum hours @ 2.200 Euros Sony DSR85P, with SDI, new drum "0hrs" @ 3.500 Euros Sony DSR1500AP, with fire wire and YUV, 680 original drum hours @ 3.500 Euros Sony DSR1500AP, with SDI& fire wire, 400 original drum hours @ 4.000 Euros Sony DSR2000P, 2600 original drum hours @ 5.500 Euros Sony DSR2000P, new drum "hrs" @ 7.000 Euros Sony DNWA30P, 2000 original drum hours @ 1.500 Euros Sony DNWA65P, 3000 drum hours @ 1.800 Euros Sony DNWA75P, 3500 original drum hours @ 4.500 Euros Sony DNWA220P, 2500 drum hours @ 4.000 Euros Sony DNWA225P, 2200 drum hours @ 7.000 Euros Sony J1, betacam SP and SX player, low hours @ 1.200 Euros Sony J3A, 1200 original drum hours @ 3.900 Euros Sony DVW522P, low original drum hours @ 2.500 Euros Sony DVW510P S/N 11198, 3278 drum hours @ 4.500 Euros Sony DVWA510P, 2500 drum hours @ 6.000 Euros Sony DVW500P S/N 16243, 3587 drum hours @ 15.000 Euros Sony DVWA500P S/N 10520, fully serviced, new drum "0hrs" @ 19.000 Euros Sony DVWM2000P, 300 original drum hours @ 23.000 Euros Sony JH3, 150 original drum hours, with fire wire @ 13.000 Euros Sony HDWM2000P S/N 49298, EX-DEMO, 390 original drum hours @ 33.000 Euros Sony HDWM2000P, NEW IN THE BOX @ 36.000 Euros CAMERA's & CAMCORDER's : Sony HDC1500, complete camera chain, specs on request, 16 units available @ 50.000 Euros/ unit Thomson LDK8000, complete camera chain, specs on request, 6 units available @ make an offer Sony DXCD30P, camera head @ 1.600 Euros Sony DXCD35P, camera head @ 2.000 Euros Thomson TTV1657D (4/3-16:9) complete triax chain @ 16.000 Euros Thomson LDK23HS MKII complete chain @ 38.000 Euros Panasonic AJD800P, 1400 drum hours @ 1.600 Euros Panasonic AJD610WAE, 700 drum hours @ 3.600 Euros Panasonic AJ-SDC615E, 1300 original drum hours @ 4.500 Euros Panasonic AJD910WAE, low hours @ 5.000 Euros Panasonic AGHVX200, ex-demo, 0hrs @ 3.300 Euros Panasonic AJSDX900, with AJ-VF20WE, 2550 original drum hours @ 7.000 Euros Panasonic AJHDX900, with AJ-HVF21, 1150 original drum hours @13.000 Euros Panasonic HPX-2100E, ex-demo, 4 years warranty, with view finder and microphone @ 18.700 Euros Panasonic AJ-HDC27 (varicam), 800 original drum hours @ 15.000 Euros Sony BVWD600P S/N 40358, 233 drum hours @ 2.000 Euros Sony HVR-Z1E, around 700 original drum hours @ 2.000 Euros Sony HVR-Z5E, NEW @ 3.740 Euros Sony HVR-Z7E, NEW @ 4.680 Euros Sony PMW-EX3, NEW @ 6.870 Euros Sony PMW-700, NEW @ 21.840 Euros Sony DSRPD150P, battery charger @ 1.200 Euros Sony DSRPD170P, battery charger, wide angle converter @ 1.600 Euros Sony DSR370P S/N 42129, 383 original drum hours, including Canon YH19x6.7KRS @ 3.500 Euros Sony DSR400P S/N 43512, 50 original drum hours @ 4.000 Euros Sony DSR500WSP S/N 42925, 800 original drum hours @ 3.000 Euros Sony DSR570WSP S/N 46925, 1200 original drum hours @ 4.500 Euros Sony DSR450WSP S/N 42790, 550 original drum hours @ 7.500 Euros Sony DVW700P, details on request @ from 2.000 Euros Sony DVW707P, details on request @ from 2.500 Euros Sony DNW7P, details on request @ from 2.000 Euros Sony DNW9WSP, details on request @ from 4.000 Euros Sony DNW90WSP, details on request @ from 6.000 Euros Sony DVW709WSP S/N 40090, 1317 original drum hours @ 9.000 Euros Sony DVW709WSP S/N 40011, 399 original drum hours @ 10.000 Euros Sony DVW790WS S/N 40330, 55 drum hours @ 13.500 Euros Sony DVW790WSP S/N 41929, 516 drum hours @ 15.000 Euros Sony DVW790WSP S/N 42199, 601 original drum hours @ 17.000 Euros Sony PDW530P S/N 40538, 40 original lazer hours @ 14.000 Euros Sony PDW530P S/N 60394, 18 original lazer hours @ 15.000 Euros Sony HDW730S S/N 10192, 551 original drum hours, like new ! @ 16.000 Euros Sony HDW750P S/N 40113, 1513 original drum hours, with down converter @ 17.000 Euros Sony HDW750P S/N 40112, 1521 original drum hours, with down converter @ 17.000 Euros Sony HDW790P, 70 original drum hours @ 23.000 Euros Sony HDWF900/3 S/N 12474, 1519 original drum hours @ 20.000 Euros LENSES : Canon ZSD300 & FPD400, ex-demo @ 1.500 Euros Fujinon A16x9BERM @ 800 Euros Canon J15x8BIRS @ 1.500 Euros Fujinon A15x8BEVM @ 1.500 Euros Fujinon A8.5x5.5BEVM @ 3.000 Euros Canon YJ19x9KRS @ 1.000 Euros Canon YJ12x6.5IRS @ 3.000 Euros Canon J16x8BIRS @ 2.500 Euros Canon J8x6BKRS @ 1.800 Euros Canon J8x6BIRS @ 2.500 Euros Canon J9x5.2BIRS @ 5.000 Euros Canon J11x4.5BIRS @ 7.000 Euros Canon J22x7.6IAS @ 6.000 Euros Canon J33x15IRS with lens support + remotes @ 17.000 Euros Fujinon A10x4.8BEVM @ 6.000 Euros Fujinon A13x4.5BERD @ 8.000 Euros Fujinon HA13x4.5BERM, @ 12.000 Euros Fujinon HA13x4.5BERM, EX-DEMO @ 13.000 Euros Fujinon HA20x7.8BM10 @ 13.000 Euros Fujinon HA10x5BM10 @ 13.000 Euros Canon HJ11x4.7BIRSE, NEW @ 13.000 Euros Canon HJ21x7.8BIRSD @ 11.000 Euros Canon HJ22x7.6BIRSE, EX-DEMO @ 13.000 Euros Canon HJ22x7.6BIASE, NEW @ 14.000 Euros Fujinon HA42x , perfect condition @ contact us Canon J55super, with zoom and focus + lens support @ 19.000 Euros Canon PJ70 MK1 with zoom and focus + lens support @ 24.000 Euros Canon PJ70 MKII with zoom and focus + lens support @ 34.000 Euros Canon DIGI SUPER 86 XS with zoom and focus @ 78.000 Euros Fujinon HAe 10x10 M T1.8 @ 45.000 Euros Fujinon Super prime set @ 14.000 Euros, including : HAe F5-M10 T1.5 and HAe F8-M10 T1.5 and HAe F20-M10 T1.5 VARIOUS : Sony DME3000 @ 3.000 Euros Sony DME7000 @ 6.000 Euros Sony CA701 @ 2.000 Euros Sony RMM7G @ 700 Euros Sony CCUM5P @ 900 Euros Sony CCUM7P @ 1.000 Euros Sony CA537P @ 700 Euros Snell & Wilcox TBS24D @ 2.000 Euros Pinnacle DEKO 500 @ 3.000 Euros Pinnacle DEKO 2000 @ 9.000 Euros Sony DSC1024 @ 1.000 Euros Panasonic BTLH900E @ 2.350 Euros Panasonic BTLH1700E @ 1.480 Euros Sony BVF-VC10W @ 1.700 Euros Sony LMD 1420 @ 500 Euros Sony LMD 2020 @ 600 Euros Sony PVM9L2 @ 500 Euros Sony PVM20M2, ex-demo @ 600 Euros Sony PVM20M4 SDI @ 1.600 Euros Sony BVM2016P with SDI @ 1.500 Euros Sony BVM20G1E with SDI & BKM10R @ 4.000 Euros Sony BVMD20F1E with BKM11RR & BKM21D & BKM14L @ 6.000 Euros Sony BVM-F24E, HD/SDI, 4000 operation hours @ 19.000 Euros Sony RM450 @ 600 Euros Sony PVE500 @ 900 Euros Sony BVE9100 @ 1.500 Euros Sony BVE2000 @ 1.500 Euros Tektronix 1721/1731 @ 600 Euros Tektronix SPG110 @ 400 Euros Tektronix SPG271 @ 1.000 Euros Tektronix TSG111 @ 500 Euros Fora FA320, TBC @ 500 Euros Fora FA330, TBC @ 600 Euros Vinten Vision 10 @ 1.300 Euros Vinten Vision 11, carbon fiber @ 2.000 Euros Sachtler S18+ SBMLCF @ 3.900 Euros Tektronix WFM300 @ 800 Euros Tektronix WFM601A @ 2.500 Euros Tektronix WFM5000, ex-demo @ 4.250 Euros Sony DMXE2000 @ 1.500 Euros Sony DMXE3000 @ 2.500 Euros Sony PCM7030 @ 600 Euros Sony PCM7040 @ 1.200 Euros Yamaha 03D @ 800 Euros DK AUDIO PT5210, Vari Time Digital Sync Generator @ 2.000 Euros IDX video wireless system SDI, Model: WIVI @ 2.700 Euros AccuScene VF 1280S HD view finder with zebra Black & White, compatible for F23/F35/Genesis/RED @ 9.000 Euros FOUCUS FS-100, fire store HD multiformat DVCPRO HD, 100Go @ 400 Euros Snell & Wilcox IQ MODULAR with IQADBBG and 2x IQAVDA @ 2.000 Euros EVS XT2 6 channels SD, 5x 73GO, audio analo, AES, 2x PSU cool swap, open code, multicam LSM, super motion, FX split screen, network SDTI 1.5, protocol VDCP/DD35/ODETICS/LOUTH, protocol AVSP @ 72.000 Euros Video Brokers [2]www.videobrokers.com Alexandre Villegoureix Tel : +33 (0)6.09.84.13.86 Email : [3]alex@videobrokers.fr [4]If you wish not to receive anyfirther offer from us please follow this link References 1. http://url.videobrokers.com/id.asp?l=51090-4030682-388176-966-0 2. http://url.videobrokers.com/id.asp?l=51090-4030682-388176-966-0 3. mailto:alex@videobrokers.fr 4. http://url.videobrokers.com/id.asp?l=51089-4030682-388176-966-0&id=388176-966-4030682-838986fc&res=fr From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 09:57:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE94F106566C for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:57:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=27729a216=a@jenisch.at) Received: from mgaterz1.oekb.co.at (mgaterz1.oekb.co.at [143.245.5.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534508FC13 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:57:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=27729a216=a@jenisch.at) Received: from srv47.oekb.co.at ([143.245.2.137]) by mgaterz1.oekb.co.at with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2009 10:27:57 +0100 Received: from MAIL1.oekb.co.at ([143.245.2.187]) by srv47.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:27:57 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at ([143.245.9.16]) by MAIL1.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:27:57 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n129Rvds004933; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:27:57 +0100 Received: (from ej@localhost) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n129RvB0004932; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:27:57 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: aurora.oekb.co.at: ej set sender to a@jenisch.at using -f Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:27:57 +0100 From: Ewald Jenisch To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20090202092757.GA2908@aurora.oekb.co.at> References: <20090130144614.GA4897@aurora.oekb.co.at> <20090130153128.GA82736@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090130153128.GA82736@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2009 09:27:57.0424 (UTC) FILETIME=[88997F00:01C98518] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.org-update -> screen garbled / settings for xorg.conf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:57:53 -0000 On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 03:31:28PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > I've got hald running as per /etc/rc.conf with hald_enable="YES" as > > well as moused (moused_enable=YES in rc.conf). > > what??? where's hald_enable="YES" documented? > There's nothing about this in X, dbus, or hald manual pages. > Perhaps this is why my X servers won't work and dbus keeps complaining > that it cannot connect.. > Hi, Running portupgrade with "batch_enable=YES" by default I also haven't noticed anything during the upgrade. Then I ran into the same error that your have - dbus complaining about not being able to connect. After spending quite some time googlin' around I finally hit this: http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq2.html and more specifically http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq2.html#full-gnome I finally enabled everything but gdm since I prefer to start up in console mode then manually going to X (which is very handy now as there are serious problems with X) Hope this helps, -ewald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 10:24:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EE2106564A for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:24:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E558FC0A for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:24:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LTvyF-0007LL-RG for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:24:03 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:24:03 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:24:03 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:23:50 +0100 Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <4986B7EE.6060103@uni-altai.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7F9660B3FA996CF6CB5F2B1E" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) In-Reply-To: <4986B7EE.6060103@uni-altai.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: apt of freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:24:05 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7F9660B3FA996CF6CB5F2B1E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alexander Wolf wrote: > I'm find into /usr/ports/sysutils/apt porting from Debian APT. >=20 > How to using this on FreeBSD? It's probably used for the "Linux emulation" in FreeBSD, you can't use it with FreeBSD native packages. --------------enig7F9660B3FA996CF6CB5F2B1E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJhsm2ldnAQVacBcgRAv9qAJ0eFaddY+XYBqt9ATA7ujfsGie/rwCgs1eT YcxQz8ygagwMLp+PCMsPUnY= =lPV5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7F9660B3FA996CF6CB5F2B1E-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 10:25:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8029B1065670 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Homeschool@streamyx.com) Received: from pp-out.tm.net.my (pp-out.tm.net.my [202.188.0.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4568FC1C for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:25:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Homeschool@streamyx.com) Received: from 3lyw4 (51.60.in-addr.arpa.tm.net.my [60.51.93.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pp4.tm.net.my (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n12933E6024007 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:03:03 +0800 Message-Id: <200902020903.n12933E6024007@pp4.tm.net.my> From: "Malaysian Homeschool Family" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:38:34 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.7400:2.4.4, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2009-02-02_01:2009-01-29, 2009-02-02, 2009-02-02 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=3 spamscore=3 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0811170000 definitions=main-0902020016 Subject: "Homeschool" sebagai Gaya Hidup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Homeschool@streamyx.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:25:52 -0000 Assalamualaikum, Sertai kami dalam playgroup Komuniti Malaysia Homeschool Unite, khas buat keluarga "homeschool" dan terbuka kepada keluarga yang berminat untuk menambah ilmu serta kenalan. Anda juga boleh berikan cadangan anda. - Jom klik di sini : http://www.forum.littlekittle.com Segmen Iklan: Only RM 25 for 3 bulan! Segmen direktori niaga buat warga Malaysia! Terbuka kepada WAHM (Work-at-Home-Mum) - Jom klik di sini : http://littlekittle.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6 Malaysian Homeschool Family Blog. - Jom klik di sini : http://littlekittle.com/blog/ Parents have always been their children's First Teachers. When children reach the age of 7 in most country we are told we need to send them off to Public School for approximately 8 hours a day. Why? Parents have taught their children from the day they were born. We teach them to walk, talk, tie their shoes, and so very much more. There is no set age at which a child can begin learning reading, math, history, science, art. Every child learns in their own way. Some children may do just fine learning out of a text book, sitting at a desk for 8 hours. There are certainly many more options that help children learn that would not be considered a normal education. Parents have been teaching their children at home since the beginning of time. Home schooling our children at home is a personal decision for everyone. No one can make the choice for you. What works for one family may not work for another. Children will not all want to study bugs at the same time. They won't all want to know why condensation forms on the windows in the winter, at the same time that little kiddy down the street wants to know the same thing. Parents understand their child better then anyone else does. We understand what makes our child go; hmmm how would this work if I put it on like this instead of the way the directions say. We have always been our children's teachers. Being as a parent and a teacher has always been the way the world works. In todays world it is no different. We choose now to keep our children learning, learning at home with us. As our children's teachers we are always on the lookout for things that we can use to help in their learning. That is where our forum Malaysia Homeschool Unite come in. We offer links to free worksheets on other sites (and more in the near future!). As well as have some that were made for the MHU forums use. We are there when you have questions, and when you want to hit your head on the wall. We offer not just the links but an ear, and a shoulder when they are needed. *Insya-Allah, Amin~* Yours sincerely, Mohd Azhar Zahir Advertising & Marketing From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 10:32:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B606106564A for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmaster@uni-altai.ru) Received: from mx1-ttk.uni-altai.ru (mx1-ttk.uni-altai.ru [81.1.237.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51E128FC1E for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:32:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmaster@uni-altai.ru) Received: from bspu.secna.ru (mail2.uni-altai.ru [10.250.2.12]) by mx1-ttk.uni-altai.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n12AWgm8060907 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:32:42 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from wmaster@uni-altai.ru) Received: from physics.uni-altai.ru (phys-bb1.uni-altai.ru [10.1.16.2]) by bspu.secna.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n12AWoYr036810 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:32:51 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from wmaster@uni-altai.ru) Received: from castle.physfac.uni-altai.ru (zerg.physfac.uni-altai.ru [10.2.0.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by physics.uni-altai.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n12AWjTl003480 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:32:45 +0600 (NOVT) (envelope-from wmaster@uni-altai.ru) Message-ID: <4986CBC9.1050500@uni-altai.ru> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:32:41 +0600 From: Alexander Wolf Organization: BSPU User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4986B7EE.6060103@uni-altai.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080809080205000707090609" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2-exp, clamav-milter version 0.94.2-exp on main.uni-altai.ru X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.92.1, clamav-milter version 0.92.1 on bspu.secna.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: apt of freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: wmaster@uni-altai.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:32:48 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080809080205000707090609 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Ivan Voras пишет: > It's probably used for the "Linux emulation" in FreeBSD, you can't use > it with FreeBSD native packages. Hmm... I'm maybe can use it for web-applications? Or not? -- With best regards, Alexander Wolf --------------080809080205000707090609-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 10:44:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8090B1065670 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:44:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345D08FC12 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:44:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LTwIU-000879-59 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:44:58 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:44:58 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:44:58 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:44:44 +0100 Lines: 31 Message-ID: References: <4986B7EE.6060103@uni-altai.ru> <4986CBC9.1050500@uni-altai.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig919ABB5C94BF59B01B726A18" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) In-Reply-To: <4986CBC9.1050500@uni-altai.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: apt of freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:44:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig919ABB5C94BF59B01B726A18 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alexander Wolf wrote: > Ivan Voras =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >> It's probably used for the "Linux emulation" in FreeBSD, you can't use= >> it with FreeBSD native packages. >=20 > Hmm... I'm maybe can use it for web-applications? Or not? You cannot use it for FreeBSD packages at all. --------------enig919ABB5C94BF59B01B726A18 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFJhs6cldnAQVacBcgRArjiAJ46IYtkDXpwfc404Aht7u21q+hZ0gCeNxkg q2ENPWR7PGWs6LkjqoSg3og= =kYaW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig919ABB5C94BF59B01B726A18-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 10:52:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83523106566B for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:52:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68C18FC1F for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 X-RZG-AUTH: :LWgJfE6Id/4Sm/WkdV0gEbKL+/p/UjmosA/b4BPf1Ida/LA6f2WjvdsA Received: from athena.laverenz.de (77-22-194-90-dynip.superkabel.de [77.22.194.90]) by post.strato.de (klopstock mo62) (RZmta 18.15) with ESMTP id v03520l1297ZTi for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:52:30 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2197127BD7 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:50:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from athena.laverenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (athena [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07981-03 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:50:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix, from userid 2000) id 7C3ED127BD9; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:50:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:50:56 +0100 From: Uwe Laverenz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090202105056.GA5906@laverenz.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: private site Sender: uwe@laverenz.de User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at laverenz.de Subject: Re: Problem gdm 2.24, xdmcp D-BUS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:52:32 -0000 On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 10:34:46PM +0100, Klaus Friis Østergaard wrote: > Thanks, but how do I reverse back to gdm 2.20? Is this possible with > the portupgrade tools? You could use ports-mgmt/portdowngrade for this or you could download http://www.laverenz.de/gdm-2.20.tar.gz and extract in in the /usr/ports/x11 directory. Uwe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 10:55:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B490B1065674 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:55:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk (mailout.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441668FC21 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:55:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LTwSU-0003Ub-O1 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:55:18 +0000 Received: from melon.esperance-linux.co.uk (54-144.adsl.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.54.144]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1/Debian-9) with ESMTP id n12AtFrS017171 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:55:15 GMT Received: by melon.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DF9F4FCA4DB; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:55:09 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 10:55:09 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20090202105509.GA69592@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <20090202022053.GA18424@anton.digitaltorque.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090202022053.GA18424@anton.digitaltorque.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE-p2 i386 X-Organisation: 'http://www.shute.org.uk/' X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.1.7 (zetnet.co.uk [194.247.46.1]); Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:55:15 +0000 (GMT) Cc: Subject: Re: problems building Parse::RecDescent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:55:24 -0000 On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 09:20:54PM -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > > I'm trying to build p5-Apache-MP3-4.00 from ports. I had it installed and > working, but it recently stopped working so I'm rebuilding it. Unfortunately > I'm having build problems. > > ===> Building for p5-Ogg-Vorbis-Header-0.03_1 > cp Header.pm blib/lib/Ogg/Vorbis/Header.pm > /usr/local/bin/perl5.8.9 -Mblib -MInline=NOISY,_INSTALL_ -MOgg::Vorbis::Header > -e1 0.03 blib/arch > Starting Build Prepocess Stage > Finished Build Prepocess Stage > > Starting Build Parse Stage > This innvocation of Inline requires the Parse::RecDescent module. > Can't locate version.pm in @INC (@INC contains: > /usr/ports/audio/p5-Ogg-Vorbis-Header/work/Ogg-Vorbis-Header-0.03/blib/arch > /usr/ports/audio/p5-Ogg-Vorbis-Header/work/Ogg-Vorbis-Header-0.03/blib/arch > /usr/ports/audio/p5-Ogg-Vorbis-Header/work/Ogg-Vorbis-Header-0.03/blib/lib > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/mach > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9 /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9/mach > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.9 .) at > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/Parse/RecDescent.pm line 1722. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/Parse/RecDescent.pm line 1722. > Compilation failed in require at > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/Inline/C/ParseRecDescent.pm line 14. > > at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.9/Inline/C.pm line 322 > INIT failed--call queue aborted. > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/audio/p5-Ogg-Vorbis-Header/work/Ogg-Vorbis-Header-0.03. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/audio/p5-Ogg-Vorbis-Header. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/p5-Apache-MP3. > > Any suggestions? > > Mike In that situation I'd try & build devel/p5-Parse-RecDescent (or re-install it) and then have another go at building the module you're trying to build. If it then works, you might want to file a pr against it. I'm assuming you did all the perl stuff in UPDATING when going to 5.8.9 Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 11:05:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759A51065670 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D88B8FC19 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LTwce-0000OZ-AH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:05:48 +0000 Received: from mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net ([82.237.75.54]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:05:48 +0000 Received: from gilles.ganault by mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:05:48 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Gilles Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:05:36 +0100 Lines: 17 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: mar92-9-82-237-75-54.fbx.proxad.net X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 090201-0, 01/02/2009), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Sender: news Subject: [6.3] ALT-CTRL-DEL = clean unmount? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:05:49 -0000 Hello I was wondering: When hitting the ALT-CTRL-DEL combination as an easy way to call "reboot", does this unmount disks properly? I'm concerned because I did this recently, and here's what dmesg says: ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, controller found non-ATA66 cable ad0: 19092MB at ata0-master UDMA33 acd0: CDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a WARNING: / was not properly dismounted WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 11:09:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E3910658CB for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@maydias.com) Received: from smtp.po.exetel.com.au (pecan.exetel.com.au [220.233.0.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19CC8FC1B for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:09:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@maydias.com) Received: from 196.43.96.58.exetel.com.au ([58.96.43.196] helo=enterprise.blackthorn.nu) by smtp.po.exetel.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1LTwfz-0001Ku-8W for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:09:15 +1100 Message-ID: <4986D465.9070201@maydias.com> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:09:25 +1000 From: Warren Liddell User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Good wireless cards for freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:09:31 -0000 Im looking to go wireless on my network an after some easy but good wireless NIC cards that freebsd has good support for. The network card im looking at is *P-Link Wireless N PCI Adapter, Atheros, 2T2R, 2.4GHz, 802.11n Draft 2.0, 802.11g/b *Thoughts and experiences welcomed.* * From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 11:20:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C221065CCE for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:20:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630BE8FC21 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:20:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LTwqc-0000zV-VX for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:20:15 +0000 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:20:14 +0000 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:20:14 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:19:59 +0100 Lines: 43 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigA2A8238F9D38F73ABFDD2B3B" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: [6.3] ALT-CTRL-DEL = clean unmount? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:20:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigA2A8238F9D38F73ABFDD2B3B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gilles wrote: > Hello >=20 > I was wondering: When hitting the ALT-CTRL-DEL combination as an easy > way to call "reboot", does this unmount disks properly? Yes. > I'm concerned because I did this recently, and here's what dmesg says: >=20 > ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, controller found non-ATA66 cable > ad0: 19092MB at ata0-master UDMA33 > acd0: CDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > WARNING: / was not properly dismounted > WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted > WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted > WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted The OS reboot process might have been interrupted somehow, or your drive might be caching more than it should be. --------------enigA2A8238F9D38F73ABFDD2B3B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQFJhtbfldnAQVacBcgRAgF5AKDZP2nij/GXmgKksIXJf6rB2a93nwCTB5EI 8DN/VRXwoIrJhwRXoM0lMQ== =cV1C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigA2A8238F9D38F73ABFDD2B3B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 12:11:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0CAA10656E7 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:11:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A528FC27 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:11:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LTxeW-0000yR-VQ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:11:56 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.238]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LTxeS-0002u0-9h for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:11:44 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost.men.bris.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n12CBhJ8097563 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:11:43 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n12CBgiA097562 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:11:42 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:11:42 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090202121141.GA97510@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20090131160939.GA67127@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> <200901310800.58267.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200901310800.58267.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Subject: Re: installworld fails - nb_NO.ISO8859-1/LC_TIME: too many levels of symbolic links X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:11:59 -0000 On Sat, Jan 31, 2009 at 08:00:58AM -0900, Mel wrote: > On Saturday 31 January 2009 07:09:39 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > I'm upgrading from 7.1-prerelease to 7.1-stable. I followed the manual. > > make buildworld, make buildkernel, make installkernel, reboot, > > make installworld fails with > > > > install: /usr/share/locale/nb_NO.ISO8859-1/LC_TIME: Too many levels of > > symbolic links > > Can you provide output of: > ls -l /usr/share/locale/nb_NO.IS8859-1/LC_TIME # ls -l /usr/share/locale/nb_NO.ISO8859-1/LC_TIME -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 365 31 Jan 16:26 /usr/share/locale/nb_NO.ISO8859-1/LC _TIME # HOwever, in the meantime, I just deleted all locale/nb* during installworld stage to get past that error. I'm not sure that what I got in the end under locale/nb* is what you'd expect. thank you anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 12:12:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D116E1065676 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:12:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Homeschool@streamyx.com) Received: from pp-out.tm.net.my (pp-out.tm.net.my [202.188.0.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8F98FC18 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Homeschool@streamyx.com) Received: from 3lyw4 (51.60.in-addr.arpa.tm.net.my [60.51.93.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pp4.tm.net.my (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id n12AvB8U022812 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:57:11 +0800 Message-Id: <200902021057.n12AvB8U022812@pp4.tm.net.my> From: "Malaysian Homeschool Family" To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:32:44 +0800 X-Priority: 3 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.7400:2.4.4, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2009-02-02_02:2009-01-29, 2009-02-02, 2009-02-02 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=3 spamscore=3 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0811170000 definitions=main-0902020033 Cc: Subject: "Homeschool" sebagai Gaya Hidup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Homeschool@streamyx.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:12:06 -0000 Assalamualaikum, Sertai kami dalam playgroup Komuniti Malaysia Homeschool Unite, khas buat keluarga "homeschool" dan terbuka kepada keluarga yang berminat untuk menambah ilmu serta kenalan. Anda juga boleh berikan cadangan anda. - Jom klik di sini : http://www.forum.littlekittle.com Segmen Iklan: Only RM 25 for 3 bulan! Segmen direktori niaga buat warga Malaysia! Terbuka kepada WAHM (Work-at-Home-Mum) - Jom klik di sini : http://littlekittle.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6 Malaysian Homeschool Family Blog. - Jom klik di sini : http://littlekittle.com/blog/ Parents have always been their children's First Teachers. When children reach the age of 7 in most country we are told we need to send them off to Public School for approximately 8 hours a day. Why? Parents have taught their children from the day they were born. We teach them to walk, talk, tie their shoes, and so very much more. There is no set age at which a child can begin learning reading, math, history, science, art. Every child learns in their own way. Some children may do just fine learning out of a text book, sitting at a desk for 8 hours. There are certainly many more options that help children learn that would not be considered a normal education. Parents have been teaching their children at home since the beginning of time. Home schooling our children at home is a personal decision for everyone. No one can make the choice for you. What works for one family may not work for another. Children will not all want to study bugs at the same time. They won't all want to know why condensation forms on the windows in the winter, at the same time that little kiddy down the street wants to know the same thing. Parents understand their child better then anyone else does. We understand what makes our child go; hmmm how would this work if I put it on like this instead of the way the directions say. We have always been our children's teachers. Being as a parent and a teacher has always been the way the world works. In todays world it is no different. We choose now to keep our children learning, learning at home with us. As our children's teachers we are always on the lookout for things that we can use to help in their learning. That is where our forum Malaysia Homeschool Unite come in. We offer links to free worksheets on other sites (and more in the near future!). As well as have some that were made for the MHU forums use. We are there when you have questions, and when you want to hit your head on the wall. We offer not just the links but an ear, and a shoulder when they are needed. *Insya-Allah, Amin~* Yours sincerely, Mohd Azhar Zahir Advertising & Marketing From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 14:07:52 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC46106566B for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:07:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A050F8FC18 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:07:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n12E7bX5002666; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:07:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n12E7aDn002663; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:07:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:07:36 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Gilles In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090202150716.H2644@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [6.3] ALT-CTRL-DEL = clean unmount? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:07:52 -0000 > I was wondering: When hitting the ALT-CTRL-DEL combination as an easy > way to call "reboot", does this unmount disks properly? it actually calls shutdown -r now > > I'm concerned because I did this recently, and here's what dmesg says: > > ad0: DMA limited to UDMA33, controller found non-ATA66 cable > ad0: 19092MB at ata0-master UDMA33 > acd0: CDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > WARNING: / was not properly dismounted > WARNING: /tmp was not properly dismounted > WARNING: /usr was not properly dismounted > WARNING: /var was not properly dismounted > there is another reason for this. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 14:16:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C0E106564A for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:16:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tl32@next.online.no) Received: from mail44.e.nsc.no (mail44.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8E48FC0C for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:16:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tl32@next.online.no) Received: from [95.34.108.198] (95.34.108.198.customer.cdi.no [95.34.108.198]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail44.nsc.no (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id n12EG9Dm025152; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:16:10 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <49870E1A.4050202@next.online.no> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:15:38 +0000 From: Tore Lund User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081220) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tijl Coosemans References: <1233269990.00068095.1233259802@10.7.7.3> <1233516181.00069428.1233503401@10.7.7.3> In-Reply-To: <1233516181.00069428.1233503401@10.7.7.3> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Excessive letter-spacing in firefox3 under wine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:16:13 -0000 Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Thursday 29 January 2009 22:02:35 Tore Lund wrote: >> Subject line says it all - large gaps between all letters. Here is a >> screenshot: http://softblur.com/misc/spacing.jpg. >> >> I suppose there are others who run firefox3 under wine on 7.1-RELEASE >> with no problems, so can anyone think of what's wrong? I have imported >> fonts from my Windows 2000 installation, and I am using the same profile >> that works well with native FreeBSD firefox and firefox on Windows 2000. >> I believe this did not happen with firefox2. Grateful for any hint. > > What exactly did you do to import those fonts? You should put them in a > separate directory under /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts, create fonts.scale > and fonts.dir in that directory using mkfontscale and mkfontdir, then > run "fc-cache -f -v" and (for completeness) add a FontPath entry to > your xorg.conf. > > Alternatively, you can install the x11-fonts/webfonts port, which > contains the most commonly used fonts. I have webfonts. In addition, I copied my Windows fonts to ~/.wine/drive_c/windows/Fonts, thinking that might have something to do with it. >> (Actually, I only use wine in order to get flash9, so if anyone could >> help me solve this problem instead, that's even better. I have tried >> the available recipes with no success - my firefox3 just freezes.) This formulation is awkward. I meant to say that I wanted flash9 to work with native FreeBSD firefox3. > Try to get it to work under linux-firefox first. Thanks for your advice, Tijl. I had already done these things, but the problem, I believe, is that linux firefox3 is a beta. As it happens, I now find that native firefox2 (2.0.0.20) works with my present setup, so I will simply use that version for the time being. I suppose linux firefox2 might also work, but there is no need for me to try it since I now have native firefox2, with flash9, with sound. -- Tore From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 14:18:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697581065677 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from omerfsen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f21.google.com (mail-bw0-f21.google.com [209.85.218.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABF88FC1D for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:18:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from omerfsen@gmail.com) Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so601483bwz.19 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:18:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qIkg25u28qZuzrtvwm+E6INGrB4iUKXyQirzuuwrdZg=; b=TSjaXirp2HPkWuMf1T7MwijNPfX0DJLRhYsmGrulJkr1NiIrmppA0ROF94QZ4tkUrw tqdil8B4bZzF9kKmPEQJn8diUC+FyI7k4zqgL/uBESDvb+n8ZsiolcYsjYymiEGNgw0w jiVmTwAUOkvUwificT/6LcTBoJX2EYYLUuWgk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=YtWbIAYVoM++DXGF+zWoJNH5jeWbO0vWf7A95Te4eWoLjD4CAsLFcI9kZlhdMG3ehj Y2pcCRfe7ayowJGT7sSmdGpQoaL9okieg3XYEPF/gqnTQgHbWmFBFTkMLVEuCaV3ucSe 2zsJz3ehE5R/UB6Hf6figR0ZfIuK2vtFMmJIo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.181.58.9 with SMTP id l9mr1680761bkk.214.1233584308594; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:18:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:18:28 +0200 Message-ID: <75a268720902020618v2ba3c798s9a6c011d107cb1a8@mail.gmail.com> From: Omer Faruk Sen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: zfs root partition boot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:18:30 -0000 Hi, Can I use zfs on / using FreeBSD 7.1? I also use http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/ script to create mirror is there such a a tool for ZFS to use on Fbsd 7.1? Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 14:24:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894C91065693 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ipfreak@yahoo.com) Received: from web52112.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web52112.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.48.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DAAB8FC25 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:24:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ipfreak@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 14699 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Feb 2009 14:24:36 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=dLRpfqg3OfL4ykaWtxe1f8VQ3xEdenZrLp3NQyT6HyUY4dxexIMcgDay0TlDrL54fcx4d7kBzx7CNDOiX0bdU51W6ZErbkLriB/Z80YioIvkPGdKq1llyvuicQ7y4aY2JaMMrRyuAC/qteLqAYVRow8ES/2kmVH9OsCqI0+B6ck=; X-YMail-OSG: u4lwqz4VM1kKuNXHMVbIWuv.UPAehp6roPHQm3KabHrGvAwOrY0- Received: from [209.22.88.90] by web52112.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:24:35 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 06:24:35 -0800 (PST) From: gahn To: freebsd general questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <769541.13800.qm@web52112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Subject: intel 64-bit version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ipfreak@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:24:40 -0000 Hi all: What is the image for intel 64-bit version of freebsd? i have xeon machine and would like to install freebsd on it. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 14:28:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DF11065676 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:28:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f21.google.com (mail-bw0-f21.google.com [209.85.218.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CF78FC1F for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com) Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so609200bwz.19 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:28:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=oIR7W1vs+APhAM7S8w9//oSJnXo0DxNRtNZ9x5Qn+cM=; b=R67SrbQWfhCY/JYGvfZST2WuUuDER4Y5Y/fmSaX7hIVzylt94UJ3tAhMDR2WZeigUg Ss+PKQUpXG4VEv9/ahALyfFRvTvflTbz+T6Z3r6DRzJ8mXLzikfjjIgSDaoWJ1c4oBDi cNBPMbijemrlFXWq0bG0yRa1bKH5Z933g2R0g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=hfRc+wU5NEzo8V64+bsS1OPba0vVYbc2wXspzs+OyS1s0qVC18lABvItRODJWjEJsf 3VDX8XOeaNoWKn9+nzpvHsI7o/qMyTIqTkl8U/65JD+ZVox9DjORP3ldjn4sAKOHQdQi IuHWQAJup/QASiYdQG+Df8oEBiN7I9nQrXEBA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.204.10 with SMTP id b10mr1687136bkg.201.1233584886886; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 06:28:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <769541.13800.qm@web52112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <769541.13800.qm@web52112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:28:06 -0500 Message-ID: <28283d910902020628o2cd27136x91b76e675caf9fda@mail.gmail.com> From: matt donovan To: ipfreak@yahoo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd general questions Subject: Re: intel 64-bit version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:28:08 -0000 On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 9:24 AM, gahn wrote: > Hi all: > > What is the image for intel 64-bit version of freebsd? i have xeon machine > and would like to install freebsd on it. > > Thanks > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" that would be amd64 since amd64 is what the x86_64 is called From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 14:40:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E79106566B for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7B6AD8FC18 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:40:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Feb 2009 14:40:19 -0000 Received: from pD952DE43.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO core2duo.local) [217.82.222.67] by mail.gmx.net (mp065) with SMTP; 02 Feb 2009 15:40:19 +0100 X-Authenticated: #4870692 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/JE11nDjrJIxF6WqfnmFjUL/gHnsg0/FJCIwjG2F YxPbUagOYzEEME Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:40:16 +0100 From: Andreas Rudisch To: ipfreak@yahoo.com Message-Id: <20090202154016.5fd0a5a3.cyb.@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <769541.13800.qm@web52112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <769541.13800.qm@web52112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-portbld-freebsd6.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__2_Feb_2009_15_40_16_+0100_u+kfZrT_TnYsRLxc" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.65 Cc: freebsd general questions Subject: Re: intel 64-bit version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:40:21 -0000 --Signature=_Mon__2_Feb_2009_15_40_16_+0100_u+kfZrT_TnYsRLxc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 06:24:35 -0800 (PST) gahn wrote: > What is the image for intel 64-bit version of freebsd? i have xeon machin= e and would like to install freebsd on it. You can use 7.1-RELEASE-i386 (32bit) or 7.1-RELEASE-amd64 (64bit) depending on whether or not you are going to run 64 bit software or want to use more than 4GB of RAM. Andreas -- GnuPG key : 0x2A573565 | http://www.gnupg.org/howtos/de/ Fingerprint: 925D 2089 0BF9 8DE5 9166 33BB F0FD CD37 2A57 3565 --Signature=_Mon__2_Feb_2009_15_40_16_+0100_u+kfZrT_TnYsRLxc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkmHBdIACgkQ8P3NNypXNWUfNgCgjS70tp8GswGDf0Dl97axf4pc BBQAnjh+nT9dGeFE1aFEmQ7NOtus/XsJ =nrdw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__2_Feb_2009_15_40_16_+0100_u+kfZrT_TnYsRLxc-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 14:57:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0D91065672 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:57:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136478FC14 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:57:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (ool-435559b8.dyn.optonline.net [67.85.89.184]) by mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0KEG00C2O1JG0KV0@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:57:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by flosoft.no-ip.biz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n12EvCAh085527; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:57:13 -0500 Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:57:12 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-reply-to: <"20090202154016.5fd0a5a3.cyb."@gmx.net> To: Andreas Rudisch <"cyb."@gmx.net> Message-id: <498709C8.1090106@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <769541.13800.qm@web52112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <"20090202154016.5fd0a5a3.cyb."@gmx.net> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090201) Cc: ipfreak@yahoo.com, freebsd general questions Subject: Re: intel 64-bit version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:57:20 -0000 Andreas Rudisch wrote: > On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 06:24:35 -0800 (PST) > gahn wrote: > > >> What is the image for intel 64-bit version of freebsd? i have xeon machine and would like to install freebsd on it. >> > > You can use 7.1-RELEASE-i386 (32bit) or 7.1-RELEASE-amd64 (64bit) > depending on whether or not you are going to run 64 bit software or > want to use more than 4GB of RAM. > > Andreas > -- > GnuPG key : 0x2A573565 | http://www.gnupg.org/howtos/de/ > Fingerprint: 925D 2089 0BF9 8DE5 9166 33BB F0FD CD37 2A57 3565 > It is a little more complicated... i386 also supports >4GB with the PAE kernel option... it is frequently better to use this then to use amd64 because (a decreasing I hope) number of ports do not compile and/or work properly on amd64... for example if your using the machine as a GUI desktop *AND* you have a nvidia video card you get almost 10 times better performence with i386 because amd64 has a hard time reconizing PCI cards installed "above" the 4gb limit (the phsycial addr is above RAM) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 15:40:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B016106568B for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:40:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF12C8FC0A for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:40:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Feb 2009 15:40:47 -0000 Received: from pD952DE43.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO core2duo.local) [217.82.222.67] by mail.gmx.net (mp014) with SMTP; 02 Feb 2009 16:40:47 +0100 X-Authenticated: #4870692 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+3oV5NKo+3GeVTrhgPoi284m1TXPpzr76KOCC0m+ 7+CHoLh7ls84sJ Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:40:43 +0100 From: Andreas Rudisch To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" Message-Id: <20090202164043.fda0abfa.cyb.@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <498709C8.1090106@gmail.com> References: <769541.13800.qm@web52112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <"20090202154016.5fd0a5a3.cyb."@gmx.net> <498709C8.1090106@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.14.7; i386-portbld-freebsd6.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__2_Feb_2009_16_40_43_+0100_8vAtXSktX=Vkr0zW" X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.59 Cc: freebsd general questions Subject: Re: intel 64-bit version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:40:49 -0000 --Signature=_Mon__2_Feb_2009_16_40_43_+0100_8vAtXSktX=Vkr0zW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:57:12 -0500 "Aryeh M. Friedman" wrote: > It is a little more complicated... i386 also supports >4GB with the PAE I know. =20 > kernel option... it is frequently better to use this then to use amd64=20 > because (a decreasing I hope) number of ports do not compile and/or work= =20 > properly on amd64... for example if your using the machine as a GUI=20 > desktop *AND* you have a nvidia video card you get almost 10 times=20 > better performence with i386 because amd64 has a hard time reconizing=20 > PCI cards installed "above" the 4gb limit (the phsycial addr is above RAM) AFAIK, the NVidia driver does not work (properly/at all) with PAE, 64 bit FreeBSD or more than 4GB of RAM. Andreas -- GnuPG key : 0x2A573565 | http://www.gnupg.org/howtos/de/ Fingerprint: 925D 2089 0BF9 8DE5 9166 33BB F0FD CD37 2A57 3565 --Signature=_Mon__2_Feb_2009_16_40_43_+0100_8vAtXSktX=Vkr0zW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkmHE/4ACgkQ8P3NNypXNWX8TQCeIX12jlXYy/dBlfT9k0UsrfqU KeUAoKioqeVja69q2LIZXVcQdHFj5Y07 =LLE0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__2_Feb_2009_16_40_43_+0100_8vAtXSktX=Vkr0zW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 15:48:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2056010656EE for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:48:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sfourman@gmail.com) Received: from yx-out-2324.google.com (yx-out-2324.google.com [74.125.44.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 000178FC18 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:48:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sfourman@gmail.com) Received: by yx-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 8so586197yxb.13 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:48:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rtPhhqD/DLbPB4u/haTpTlBq6d0QW570DjHFCGnNzzE=; b=BtJuDr6FXsV+ze//HHcyp4ZEd/BhvG+/FGjYnDbp3PfGEwcb/8Am6HLVCzLOcP/KH3 eyByqy4Z2JlKd2q2h75I0u4pJXg0H0l/E3n+YY8UFOUJ/L4i87Zu8lYpGHZdOFsqcncg TkJcKgTkC0y/EfHvK+W3+lLWzyFtHyuxYFaG8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jMXl32SnUwDKw41SwynRhXrIHvSOdWGaHytnMByYG1Bx44Ld8UYBityKZm9i0lA3Wi hTr+xXkD41+W2IUl//ItzcnsTcV/btiSp809CS/5gD7iz3GWUv9R8RTZBmcwbUcOWyN9 7hya2qdkFUuHd5nIfyV3i29SX2Bt4ehvpMEn4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.68.19 with SMTP id v19mr1026278ank.62.1233589681296; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 07:48:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <498709C8.1090106@gmail.com> References: <769541.13800.qm@web52112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <20090202154016.5fd0a5a3.cyb.@gmx.net> <498709C8.1090106@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:48:01 -0600 Message-ID: <11167f520902020748h21a11684n137ae139b367b82f@mail.gmail.com> From: "Sam Fourman Jr." To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ipfreak@yahoo.com, Andreas Rudisch <"cyb."@gmx.net>, freebsd general questions Subject: Re: intel 64-bit version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:48:03 -0000 > It is a little more complicated... i386 also supports >4GB with the PAE > kernel option... it is frequently better to use this then to use amd64 > because (a decreasing I hope) number of ports do not compile and/or work > properly on amd64... for example if your using the machine as a GUI desktop > *AND* you have a nvidia video card you get almost 10 times better > performence with i386 because amd64 has a hard time reconizing PCI cards > installed "above" the 4gb limit (the phsycial addr is above RAM) I could be wrong, but I thought that the nvidia binary driver did not work on a i386 PAE kernel. Sam Fourman Jr. Fourman Networks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 15:53:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079BF1065672 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.4.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD9D8FC17 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:53:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (ool-435559b8.dyn.optonline.net [67.85.89.184]) by mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-8.04 (built Feb 28 2007)) with ESMTP id <0KEG006PP44UW460@mta1.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:53:21 -0500 (EST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by flosoft.no-ip.biz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n12FrClC062754; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:53:12 -0500 Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:53:12 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-reply-to: <11167f520902020748h21a11684n137ae139b367b82f@mail.gmail.com> To: "Sam Fourman Jr." Message-id: <498716E8.7060209@gmail.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <769541.13800.qm@web52112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <"20090202154016.5fd0a5a3.cyb."@gmx.net> <498709C8.1090106@gmail.com> <11167f520902020748h21a11684n137ae139b367b82f@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090201) Cc: ipfreak@yahoo.com, Andreas Rudisch <"cyb."@gmx.net>, freebsd general questions Subject: Re: intel 64-bit version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:53:26 -0000 Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: >> It is a little more complicated... i386 also supports >4GB with the PAE >> kernel option... it is frequently better to use this then to use amd64 >> because (a decreasing I hope) number of ports do not compile and/or work >> properly on amd64... for example if your using the machine as a GUI desktop >> *AND* you have a nvidia video card you get almost 10 times better >> performence with i386 because amd64 has a hard time reconizing PCI cards >> installed "above" the 4gb limit (the phsycial addr is above RAM) >> > > > I could be wrong, but I thought that the nvidia binary driver did not > work on a i386 PAE kernel. > > Sam Fourman Jr. > Fourman Networks > > If I implied it I did not mean it I am sorry... (bad example) there are other ports that do work with PAE and not with AMD64 (forget what they are right now since I switched from amd64 to i386 almost 6 months ago)... also I do not know of any ports that do work with amd64 that do not work with PAE... I have not checked this but I think the primary difference is how large gcc reports void * (and other ptr's) to be as well the size of int's From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 16:02:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB421065676 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:02:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from op@trekdanne.se) Received: from hydrogen.nixihost.com (nixihost.com [75.126.199.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFBC8FC13 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:02:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from op@trekdanne.se) Received: from c83-251-41-223.bredband.comhem.se ([83.251.41.223] helo=localhost) by hydrogen.nixihost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LU0Rr-0003aQ-Ax for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:10:55 -0600 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:14:05 +0100 From: Daniel Lannstrom To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090202151405.GA14836@haruhi> References: <75a268720902020618v2ba3c798s9a6c011d107cb1a8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <75a268720902020618v2ba3c798s9a6c011d107cb1a8@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - hydrogen.nixihost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - trekdanne.se X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: zfs root partition boot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:02:16 -0000 On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 04:18:28PM +0200, Omer Faruk Sen wrote: > Can I use zfs on / using FreeBSD 7.1? Yes. But you need a /boot partition so the bootloader can find the kernel. See http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSOnRoot and http://www.ish.com.au/solutions/articles/freebsdzfs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 16:14:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F02106566B for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:14:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Received: from pukruppa.net (pukruppa.net [213.146.114.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5CD8FC08 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:14:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Received: from pukruppa.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pukruppa.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n12GHTHA009217; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:17:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ulrich@pukruppa.net) Message-ID: <49871C99.8080902@pukruppa.net> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:17:29 +0100 From: Peter Ulrich Kruppa User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090130) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Homeschool@streamyx.com, FreeBSD-Questions References: <200902021057.n12AvB8U022812@pp4.tm.net.my> <49871C04.5040500@pukruppa.net> In-Reply-To: <49871C04.5040500@pukruppa.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: "Homeschool" sebagai Gaya Hidup? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:14:06 -0000 Peter Ulrich Kruppa schrieb: Indeed FreeBSD as an Operating System, coming with a huge software collection, offers about everything you will need for home learning and teaching - and is completely free. Since there is a long tradition of Open Source Communities supporting educational purposes, I am convinced everybody on this list is willing to assist you in technical questions about setting up learning platforms like moodle or compiling an office suite like OpenOffice. Good luck! Uli. > > Malaysian Homeschool Family schrieb: >> Assalamualaikum, >> >> Sertai kami dalam playgroup Komuniti Malaysia Homeschool >> Unite, khas buat keluarga "homeschool" dan terbuka kepada >> keluarga yang berminat untuk menambah ilmu serta kenalan. Anda >> juga boleh berikan cadangan anda. - Jom klik di sini : >> http://www.forum.littlekittle.com >> >> >> Segmen Iklan: Only RM 25 for 3 bulan! Segmen direktori niaga >> buat warga Malaysia! Terbuka kepada WAHM (Work-at-Home-Mum) - >> Jom klik di sini : >> http://littlekittle.com/forum/showthread.php?t=6 >> >> Malaysian Homeschool Family Blog. - Jom klik di sini : >> http://littlekittle.com/blog/ >> >> Parents have always been their children's First Teachers. >> >> When children reach the age of 7 in most country we are told >> we need to send them off to Public School for approximately 8 >> hours a day. Why? >> >> Parents have taught their children from the day they were >> born. We teach them to walk, talk, tie their shoes, and so >> very much more. >> >> There is no set age at which a child can begin learning >> reading, math, history, science, art. >> >> Every child learns in their own way. >> >> >> Some children may do just fine learning out of a text book, >> sitting at a desk for 8 hours. There are certainly many more >> options that help children learn that would not be considered >> a normal education. >> >> Parents have been teaching their children at home since the >> beginning of time. >> >> >> Home schooling our children at home is a personal decision for >> everyone. No one can make the choice for you. >> >> What works for one family may not work for another. Children >> will not all want to study bugs at the same time. >> >> They won't all want to know why condensation forms on the >> windows in the winter, at the same time that little kiddy down >> the street wants to know the same thing. >> >> Parents understand their child better then anyone else does. >> >> We understand what makes our child go; hmmm how would this >> work if I put it on like this instead of the way the >> directions say. >> >> We have always been our children's teachers. Being as a parent >> and a teacher has always been the way the world works. >> >> >> In todays world it is no different. >> >> We choose now to keep our children learning, learning at home >> with us. >> >> As our children's teachers we are always on the lookout for >> things that we can use to help in their learning. >> >> >> That is where our forum Malaysia Homeschool Unite come in. >> >> We offer links to free worksheets on other sites (and more in >> the near future!). As well as have some that were made for the >> MHU forums use. >> >> We are there when you have questions, and when you want to hit >> your head on the wall. >> >> We offer not just the links but an ear, and a shoulder when >> they are needed. *Insya-Allah, Amin~* >> >> >> Yours sincerely, Mohd Azhar Zahir Advertising & Marketing >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To >> unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 16:20:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0CC1065676 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:20:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91A08FC17 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n12GJubZ002980; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:19:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n12GJuJo002977; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:19:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:19:56 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: gahn In-Reply-To: <769541.13800.qm@web52112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090202171937.M2976@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <769541.13800.qm@web52112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd general questions Subject: Re: intel 64-bit version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:20:07 -0000 > What is the image for intel 64-bit version of freebsd? i have xeon machine and would like to install freebsd on it. > it's FreeBSD/amd64, as 64-bit intel is compatible with amd64 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 16:36:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4CB106564A for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:36:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=27729a216=a@jenisch.at) Received: from mgaterz1.oekb.co.at (mgaterz1.oekb.co.at [143.245.5.111]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40DF08FC13 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=27729a216=a@jenisch.at) Received: from srv47.oekb.co.at ([143.245.2.137]) by mgaterz1.oekb.co.at with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2009 17:36:48 +0100 Received: from MAIL1.oekb.co.at ([143.245.2.187]) by srv47.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:36:48 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at ([143.245.9.16]) by MAIL1.oekb.co.at with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:36:47 +0100 Received: from aurora.oekb.co.at (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n12Gal8B006619; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:36:47 +0100 Received: (from ej@localhost) by aurora.oekb.co.at (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id n12GalBX006618; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:36:47 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: aurora.oekb.co.at: ej set sender to a@jenisch.at using -f Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:36:47 +0100 From: Ewald Jenisch To: Luke Dean Message-ID: <20090202163647.GD2908@aurora.oekb.co.at> References: <20090130144614.GA4897@aurora.oekb.co.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2009 16:36:47.0933 (UTC) FILETIME=[712D96D0:01C98554] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.org-update -> screen garbled / settings for xorg.conf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:36:50 -0000 On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:30:02AM -0800, Luke Dean wrote: > > Me too. > I started a thread a few days ago titled "Restarting new Xorg freezes > system". > My symptoms are the same as yours. > I'm not running hald at all. > I'm not using full-blown gnome, just windowmaker. > I'm using the "radeon" driver on an ATI HD 4350 > > I just tried switching to the "vesa" driver, and now I can stop and start > X as much as I want with no problems whatsoever. > I know that this was not a problem with the "radeon" driver prior to the > Xorg update. Hi, Did a few tests more: 1) Section "ServerLayout" Option "AllowEmptyInput" "false" Section "Device" Driver "radeon" moused running hald running Result: X (gnome in my case) starts, mouse moves. Upon leaving X the console is to something different than 80x25 lines - at least I can't see about 2-3 lines on the bottom of the screen. However - as soon as a start X again I get graphical junk on the display, mouse & keyboard frozen, no switching of consoles nor can I log in via the net (ssh) 2) Same as 1) above however this time with Driver "radeonhd" Result: Almost the same as 1) above - only difference: When I leave X the console comes back again to 80x25 lines. Hoever - like in 1) above - the second attempt to start X ends in a machine completely frozen :-( 3) Same as 1) - this time with Driver "vesa" Result: Everything works - i.e. back and forth between X and console. Sure enough working with Vesa is a workaround only given the huge difference in speed between the Vesa- and radeon drivers. 4) Option "AutoAddDevices" "Off" under 'Section "ServerLayout"' with Driver "radeonhd" Result: X works only once (as in Tests 1&2 above). Second attempt to start X gives a "frozen box" again. As you already mentioned o) no problem with VESA-Driver o) no problems with radeon-driver prior to the Upgrade to X 7.4 Hope this helps someone out there to track things down. -ewald From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 16:47:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 211E9106564A for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:47:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D41AC8FC1E for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:47:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LU1wq-00031y-Iu for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:47:09 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.238]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LU1wn-0007XV-9B for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:46:57 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost.men.bris.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n12GkueH043071 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:46:56 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n12GktTr043070 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:46:55 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:46:54 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090202164654.GA43018@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Subject: X, dbus and hal - how to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:47:10 -0000 I'm running X remotely, i.e. xorg-server and clients are on different boxes. After reading freebsd.org/gnome FAQs and hal FAQs my impression is that dbus and hal must be run on the clients box, not on the server. Can somebody confirm this? many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 17:00:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8837106566B for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:00:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from testcat2003@yahoo.com) Received: from web33107.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33107.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.69.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A32F8FC0C for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:00:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from testcat2003@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 68492 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Feb 2009 17:00:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=uKnpFLB5dGnnvDneIZtysnV04iMN5fT5yB5KjAjs4lSdBHvClciQ9bGUjyugePimxXNMoxTVIrnD4dIdgYlQb5tfR4bgub3xojPJI9Pjwh+uPBFyIbVkhqXmtuldZdgtvo34tkFYhz8b2/pqdZ9F97oiWwK/pYeYFWKnDgL8t3A=; X-YMail-OSG: BJqOn1IVM1lh9S0iGre1gyLI9bwI0NsPKbIkZHK6j5EZ86DGqmihFztnKdqsAe.eYea1bSzv15nhTb3tQnUgxY_JqmVyfY6RYdaX0CXE0K1BTeneBqH0VqH87vds3Ul5EjEkKDg07kBP6zo2HoIs7BDKt3dz9Pbi6X3DpD9Ts9Vu2Y3s2_6y0xNd1uhSolSmt8GNKWCUFS1oP_iRwfUq.LL8R3EqTrm7XHfe6w-- Received: from [208.6.238.24] by web33107.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 09:00:26 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.7.260.1 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:00:26 -0800 (PST) From: Wayne To: Dan Nelson In-Reply-To: <20090131213315.GE75802@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <832987.51059.qm@web33107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ls -lh show file not displaying correct size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: testcat2003@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:00:28 -0000 Thanks for the answer so now for the next question. How do I sync this file to other FreeBSD servers. I tried using rsync with the --spares but the size on the other server was on it's way to being the 256G size and fill up the other server. How would I go about making an exact duplicate.=20 Wayne --- On Sat, 1/31/09, Dan Nelson wrote: From: Dan Nelson Subject: Re: ls -lh show file not displaying correct size To: "Wayne" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Saturday, January 31, 2009, 3:33 PM In the last episode (Jan 31), Wayne said: > Hello, >=20 > I have a db file of FreeBSD 7.1 amd64 that is displaying the wrong size. This is a db file used by my mail filter software to to Bayes Filtering. > If I do an ls -l or ls -lh I get > filter1# ls -l > total 489024 > -rw-------=A0 1 defang=A0 defang=A0 274992627712 Jan 31 08:33 @@RPTN.db > filter1# ls -lh > total 489024 > -rw-------=A0 1 defang=A0 defang=A0=A0 256G Jan 31 08:33 @@RPTN.db > If I do a du I gecus18-179# du > 489026=A0 . > cus18-179# du -h > 478M=A0=A0=A0 . > My drive is only 250 Gig and I have it mounted as /var/spool here is my d= f for the whole file system. > /dev/ad14s1d=A0=A0=A0 226G=A0=A0=A0 810M=A0=A0=A0 207G=A0=A0=A0=A0 0%=A0= =A0=A0 /var/spool >=20 > So I know that the 256G is wrong. Can any one tell me what is up with fil= e size ? The 256G is correct. It's a sparse file (i.e. there are holes in it).=20 "ls -sk" will print the actual disk space occupied by a file. --=20 =09Dan Nelson =09dnelson@allantgroup.com _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 17:11:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5E4E1065678 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:11:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: from hellskitchen.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.14.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 795948FC12 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:11:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: FROM dell1 (Unknown [141.211.15.39]) BY hellskitchen.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 49872539.58EF4.27828 ; 2 Feb 2009 11:54:17 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:52:44 -0500 From: William Bulley To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090202165244.GB1012@dell1> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: short-changed on SD card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:11:39 -0000 Recently purchased a brand new 2.0 GB secure digital (SD) card. When I plugged this into a USB dongle and plugged the USB dongle into an available USB socket on my FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE system the output from dmesg(8) reported this: da1: 960MB (1967616 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 960C) This is much closer to 1.0 GB than 2.0 GB so I at once wondered if I had been scammed in my purchase of this brand new SD card. Once I'd mounted /dev/da1s1 on /mnt, the df(1) command also reported 960 MB. I then copied a 300+ megabyte file onto /mnt and then ran the df(1) command again. This time it reported 1.9 GB total and 1.6 GB available. WHAT IS GOING ON HERE? Am I going crazy? Is this normal behaviour for a FAT16 formatted (raw/blank) SD card? Is there something I can do using the fdisk(8) or similar command to change the SD card so that it believes (and FreeBSD believes) that it is truly a 2.0 GB card? As I continued writing (large, multi-hundred megabyte) files to the mounted SD card, the system eventually seized up and I had to reboot. I expect this had something to do with my having crossed the 960 MB boundary on this SD card. Help! Any ideas gratefully accepted. Regards, web... -- William Bulley Email: web@umich.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 17:38:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8091065672 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:38:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from op@trekdanne.se) Received: from hydrogen.nixihost.com (nixihost.com [75.126.199.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488B08FC19 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:38:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from op@trekdanne.se) Received: from c83-251-41-223.bredband.comhem.se ([83.251.41.223] helo=localhost) by hydrogen.nixihost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LU2kt-0004hc-IV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:38:43 -0600 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:41:55 +0100 From: Daniel Lannstrom To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090202174155.GA19540@haruhi> References: <20090202164654.GA43018@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090202164654.GA43018@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - hydrogen.nixihost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - trekdanne.se X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: Re: X, dbus and hal - how to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:38:44 -0000 > After reading freebsd.org/gnome FAQs and hal FAQs my impression is that > dbus and hal must be run on the clients box, not on the server. > > Can somebody confirm this? AFAIK that is correct. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 17:46:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444E71065761 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:46:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04688FC19 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:46:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389A9AFC1FE; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:46:26 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:46:14 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20090202165244.GB1012@dell1> In-Reply-To: <20090202165244.GB1012@dell1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902020846.14901.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: William Bulley Subject: Re: short-changed on SD card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:46:29 -0000 On Monday 02 February 2009 07:52:44 William Bulley wrote: > Recently purchased a brand new 2.0 GB secure digital (SD) card. > > When I plugged this into a USB dongle and plugged the USB dongle > into an available USB socket on my FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE system the > output from dmesg(8) reported this: > > da1: 960MB (1967616 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 960C) > > This is much closer to 1.0 GB than 2.0 GB so I at once wondered > if I had been scammed in my purchase of this brand new SD card. > > Once I'd mounted /dev/da1s1 on /mnt, the df(1) command also reported > 960 MB. I then copied a 300+ megabyte file onto /mnt and then ran > the df(1) command again. This time it reported 1.9 GB total and > 1.6 GB available. WHAT IS GOING ON HERE? Am I going crazy? On a hunch, it's really 1G FAT, 1G HFS ("mac"). You could reformat it using fdisk/newfs. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 17:56:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AF0106564A for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58EE8FC08 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D44AFC1FE; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:56:39 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Matthias Apitz Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 08:56:39 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20090202085740.GA4654@rebelion.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20090202085740.GA4654@rebelion.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902020856.39396.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Subject: Re: no cats at home, but system (7.0-STABLE) reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:56:41 -0000 On Sunday 01 February 2009 23:57:40 Matthias Apitz wrote: > Hello, > > I'm alone in my flat and have no cats :-) > Last night I powered down my laptop (with the power-off button), the > system went down, but later re-booted by its own: > > Feb 1 23:04:08 rebelion ipmon[839]: 23:04:08.145552 6x iwi0 @0:26 b > 127.0.0.1,0 -> 0.0.0.0,0 PR tcp len 20 40 -AR OUT Feb 1 23:06:24 rebelion > acpi: resumed at 20090201 23:06:24 ^^^^^^^ It did not power down, it suspended. Check hw.acpi.power_button_state or maybe you pressed too short or too long. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 17:57:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D302510656CC for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: from hellskitchen.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.14.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84BDA8FC18 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:57:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: FROM dell1 (Unknown [141.211.15.39]) BY hellskitchen.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 49873420.4E9E1.29608 ; 2 Feb 2009 12:57:52 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 12:56:19 -0500 From: William Bulley To: Mel Message-ID: <20090202175619.GD1012@dell1> Mail-Followup-To: Mel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: short-changed on SD card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:57:54 -0000 According to Mel on Mon, 02/02/09 at 12:46: > > On Monday 02 February 2009 07:52:44 William Bulley wrote: > > Recently purchased a brand new 2.0 GB secure digital (SD) card. > > > > When I plugged this into a USB dongle and plugged the USB dongle > > into an available USB socket on my FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE system the > > output from dmesg(8) reported this: > > > > da1: 960MB (1967616 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 960C) > > > > This is much closer to 1.0 GB than 2.0 GB so I at once wondered > > if I had been scammed in my purchase of this brand new SD card. > > > > Once I'd mounted /dev/da1s1 on /mnt, the df(1) command also reported > > 960 MB. I then copied a 300+ megabyte file onto /mnt and then ran > > the df(1) command again. This time it reported 1.9 GB total and > > 1.6 GB available. WHAT IS GOING ON HERE? Am I going crazy? > > On a hunch, it's really 1G FAT, 1G HFS ("mac"). You could reformat it using > fdisk/newfs. That might be a good hunch, but the SD card itself just says "2.0 GB" on the outside - no mention there or when I purchased it to have any Mac-ness. I don't recall seeing anything Mac-ish when I ran the fdisk(8) command as % fdisk da1 The output then seemed to correctly reflect that partition (slice) one (1) was 960 MB in size. I tried later (once the system had recovered and the fsck(8) had finished) to use fdisk(8) to put 1920 MB into slice one. But that didn't seem to work. I marked all the other three slices as "UNUSED". Is there any trick to using fdisk(8) that is hidden in the man page which I evidently missed? I used the "-i" flag and it led me by the had through each slice - I thought I did the "right" thing, but I was never able to mount(8) the SD card after that, even though dmesg(8) reported "da1" as being there. I kept getting "invalid parameter" or the like when I tried mounting as I am used to: # mount_msdosfs -l /dev/da1s1 /mnt I also tried: # mount_msdosfs -l /dev/da1 /mnt But both versions failed. Finally, in desperation, I formatted the SD card on a Windows XP laptop. Windows put it back into FAT shape (using the low level - not the "quick" - format there) and gave it 960 MB, sigh... :-( Regards, web... -- William Bulley Email: web@umich.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 18:01:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB37106566C for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DDB8FC16 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EB6AFC1FE; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:01:13 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:01:13 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <498698F9.1030204@maydias.com> In-Reply-To: <498698F9.1030204@maydias.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902020901.13750.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Warren Liddell Subject: Re: Error compiling Imagmagick X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:01:15 -0000 On Sunday 01 February 2009 21:55:53 Warren Liddell wrote: > Im running AMD64 4gig RAM FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE, ports an src are all up to > date... Below is the error output trying to compile imagmagick as part > of the dependency whilst installing DVDrip run make config in graphics/ImageMagick and uncheck the "Run bundled self-tests after build" option. This will continue the install. You may want to provide the output of the failing test through send-pr, so that it can be investigated. -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 18:05:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A93106567D for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) Received: from hunter.Sisis.de (mail.oclc.de [193.31.11.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771318FC27 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) Received: (from mail@localhost) by hunter.Sisis.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA18005; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:55:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) Received: from ppp-93-104-101-172.dynamic.mnet-online.de(93.104.101.172) by hunter.Sisis.de via smap (V2.1) id xma017996; Mon, 2 Feb 09 18:55:45 +0100 Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id n12I4xxb002846; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:04:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to matthias.apitz@oclc.org using -f Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:04:59 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Mel Message-ID: <20090202180459.GA2625@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20090202085740.GA4654@rebelion.Sisis.de> <200902020856.39396.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200902020856.39396.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE (i386) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no cats at home, but system (7.0-STABLE) reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:05:12 -0000 El día Monday, February 02, 2009 a las 08:56:39AM -0900, Mel escribió: > On Sunday 01 February 2009 23:57:40 Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm alone in my flat and have no cats :-) > > Last night I powered down my laptop (with the power-off button), the > > system went down, but later re-booted by its own: > > > > Feb 1 23:04:08 rebelion ipmon[839]: 23:04:08.145552 6x iwi0 @0:26 b > > 127.0.0.1,0 -> 0.0.0.0,0 PR tcp len 20 40 -AR OUT Feb 1 23:06:24 rebelion > > acpi: resumed at 20090201 23:06:24 > ^^^^^^^ > > It did not power down, it suspended. Check hw.acpi.power_button_state or maybe > you pressed too short or too long. $ sysctl hw.acpi.power_button_state hw.acpi.power_button_state: S5 but the other messages (you have cut out) says that it run through shutdown at 23:06:33 and later at 23:42:42 it did a normal re-boot while I was sleeping already; this does not make sense; don't you agree? matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.oclc.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 18:20:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 762021065694 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:20:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6E38FC26 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:20:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so580783fgb.35 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:20:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ac6fYo+r7AoT1olc0YU0mt2WvEjjJlUPV0myVZMdGq4=; b=fFV+/rq0J4fzgscBlz37nmRYqN9nF4D6KoVGxI+AdL/15J1E9ORVbGkCYbp1pt+34A hjk7S/9d3XHwmf8tTKEs6ocw0VuOC4geLtYpIdRgKvawvPbAN0OgECuNv7TJRfTimn5w ymEX46XPqS38LtteuEe8JRPDPHAT0F7Spq0CE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lFcI9m68jxtW/fn+1iCUXSvFCOIuRpC/6x9FtWSy1EVtFGJFWddcsFIo/4nJZ8O8Yu QgtKo1s2yjsUmy8/1WlcMRrH00EMYABAvyEY5vyOpg5dAXpaOU8xmfQBFB9A4JjCjk1R dYfBdi0iXmNVFsHDKVz/u1GdyXfXp+7kifskw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.86.30.9 with SMTP id d9mr658697fgd.56.1233598846856; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 10:20:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090202163647.GD2908@aurora.oekb.co.at> References: <20090130144614.GA4897@aurora.oekb.co.at> <20090202163647.GD2908@aurora.oekb.co.at> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:20:46 +0100 Message-ID: <1bd550a00902021020y7ecc02doe8c3859997e5b61@mail.gmail.com> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: Ewald Jenisch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Luke Dean Subject: Re: X.org-update -> screen garbled / settings for xorg.conf? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:20:49 -0000 On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Ewald Jenisch wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 11:30:02AM -0800, Luke Dean wrote: >> >> Me too. >> I started a thread a few days ago titled "Restarting new Xorg freezes >> system". >> My symptoms are the same as yours. >> I'm not running hald at all. >> I'm not using full-blown gnome, just windowmaker. >> I'm using the "radeon" driver on an ATI HD 4350 >> >> I just tried switching to the "vesa" driver, and now I can stop and start >> X as much as I want with no problems whatsoever. >> I know that this was not a problem with the "radeon" driver prior to the >> Xorg update. > > Hi, > > Did a few tests more: > > 1) Section "ServerLayout" > Option "AllowEmptyInput" "false" > Section "Device" > Driver "radeon" > moused running > hald running > > Result: X (gnome in my case) starts, mouse moves. Upon leaving X the > console is to something different than 80x25 lines - at least I can't > see about 2-3 lines on the bottom of the screen. However - as soon as > a start X again I get graphical junk on the display, mouse & keyboard > frozen, no switching of consoles nor can I log in via the net (ssh) Just for the record, this used to happen in Linux (Fedora 9) but it's working since some time ago (sorry, I don't remember when this was fixed) radeon now works and doesn't freeze if you try to bring the X Server up again. I'm using Xorg 7.4 too However, I experience the same problems in my system (ATI RadeonHD 2400 with FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p2) > > > 2) Same as 1) above however this time with > Driver "radeonhd" > > Result: Almost the same as 1) above - only difference: When I leave X > the console comes back again to 80x25 lines. Hoever - like in 1) above > - the second attempt to start X ends in a machine completely frozen :-( > > 3) Same as 1) - this time with > Driver "vesa" > > Result: Everything works - i.e. back and forth between X and > console. Sure enough working with Vesa is a workaround only given the > huge difference in speed between the Vesa- and radeon drivers. > > > 4) Option "AutoAddDevices" "Off" under 'Section "ServerLayout"' > with > Driver "radeonhd" > > Result: X works only once (as in Tests 1&2 above). Second attempt to > start X gives a "frozen box" again. > > > > As you already mentioned > > o) no problem with VESA-Driver > > o) no problems with radeon-driver prior to the Upgrade to X 7.4 > > > Hope this helps someone out there to track things down. > > -ewald > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 18:22:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726B61065822 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:22:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E99A8FC25 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:22:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A08AFC1FE; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:22:28 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:22:27 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20090131091825.R90262@hub.org> <4984583C.2030409@infracaninophile.co.uk> <84467B60728CC902BB853C9B@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <84467B60728CC902BB853C9B@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902020922.27815.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" Subject: Re: Load balancing multiple virtual hosts on 1 IP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:22:30 -0000 On Sunday 01 February 2009 19:33:38 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Thank you for all the responses ... turns out the solution was simplier ... > I tried the various solutions presented, and each of them did the same > thing ... > > The setup I have, I'm using csync2 to maintain the file systems on each > backend, and in order to simplify that, I'm using: > > > > instead of > > > > which works fine ... *but*, something gets confused when you mix-n-match > the above ... its either all of one or the other, but not both ... once I > fixed my config files, the pages now load consistently ... I'm assuming you also have: NameVirtualHost * http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/core.html#virtualhost Addr can be: - The character *, which is used only in combination with NameVirtualHost * to match all IP addresses; -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 18:34:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C23321065670 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:34:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EE038FC19 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 18:34:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net) Received: from localhost (mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.101]) by mail.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B39AFC1FE; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:34:38 -0900 (AKST) From: Mel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Matthias Apitz Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:34:38 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20090202085740.GA4654@rebelion.Sisis.de> <200902020856.39396.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20090202180459.GA2625@rebelion.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20090202180459.GA2625@rebelion.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902020934.38501.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Subject: Re: no cats at home, but system (7.0-STABLE) reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:34:40 -0000 On Monday 02 February 2009 09:04:59 Matthias Apitz wrote: > El d=EDa Monday, February 02, 2009 a las 08:56:39AM -0900, Mel escribi=F3: > > On Sunday 01 February 2009 23:57:40 Matthias Apitz wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm alone in my flat and have no cats :-) > > > Last night I powered down my laptop (with the power-off button), the > > > system went down, but later re-booted by its own: > > > > > > Feb 1 23:04:08 rebelion ipmon[839]: 23:04:08.145552 6x iwi0 @0:26 b > > > 127.0.0.1,0 -> 0.0.0.0,0 PR tcp len 20 40 -AR OUT Feb 1 23:06:24 > > > rebelion acpi: resumed at 20090201 23:06:24 > > > > ^^^^^^^ > > > > It did not power down, it suspended. Check hw.acpi.power_button_state or > > maybe you pressed too short or too long. > > $ sysctl hw.acpi.power_button_state > hw.acpi.power_button_state: S5 > > but the other messages (you have cut out) says that it run through shutdo= wn > at 23:06:33 and later at 23:42:42 it did a normal re-boot while I was > sleeping already; this does not make sense; don't you agree? > Right, I'm not awake yet. 36 minutes is odd. The only scenario I can think = of: =2D acpi shutdown did not work, it was instead a 'halt' and in your sleep y= ou=20 pressed the any key to start the reboot ;) You can see if shutdown works properly by shutdown -p NOW. Then try the sam= e=20 using the power button, just in case there's something different. If that a= ll=20 works, search for monkeys. =2D-=20 Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 19:13:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0E32106564A for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:13:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888E18FC13 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:13:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n12JCFrS022993; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:12:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id n12JCEIZ022992; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:12:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:12:14 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Mel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090202191214.GA22919@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20090202175619.GD1012@dell1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090202175619.GD1012@dell1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: Re: short-changed on SD card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:13:45 -0000 On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 12:56:19PM -0500, William Bulley wrote: > According to Mel on Mon, 02/02/09 at 12:46: > > > > On Monday 02 February 2009 07:52:44 William Bulley wrote: > > > Recently purchased a brand new 2.0 GB secure digital (SD) card. > > > > > > When I plugged this into a USB dongle and plugged the USB dongle > > > into an available USB socket on my FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE system the > > > output from dmesg(8) reported this: > > > > > > da1: 960MB (1967616 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 960C) > > > > > > This is much closer to 1.0 GB than 2.0 GB so I at once wondered > > > if I had been scammed in my purchase of this brand new SD card. > > > > > > Once I'd mounted /dev/da1s1 on /mnt, the df(1) command also reported > > > 960 MB. I then copied a 300+ megabyte file onto /mnt and then ran > > > the df(1) command again. This time it reported 1.9 GB total and > > > 1.6 GB available. WHAT IS GOING ON HERE? Am I going crazy? > > > > On a hunch, it's really 1G FAT, 1G HFS ("mac"). You could reformat it using > > fdisk/newfs. > > That might be a good hunch, but the SD card itself just says "2.0 GB" on the > outside - no mention there or when I purchased it to have any Mac-ness. > > I don't recall seeing anything Mac-ish when I ran the fdisk(8) command as > > % fdisk da1 > > The output then seemed to correctly reflect that partition (slice) one (1) > was 960 MB in size. I tried later (once the system had recovered and the > fsck(8) had finished) to use fdisk(8) to put 1920 MB into slice one. But > that didn't seem to work. I marked all the other three slices as "UNUSED". > Is there any trick to using fdisk(8) that is hidden in the man page which > I evidently missed? I used the "-i" flag and it led me by the had through > each slice - I thought I did the "right" thing, but I was never able to > mount(8) the SD card after that, even though dmesg(8) reported "da1" as > being there. I kept getting "invalid parameter" or the like when I tried > mounting as I am used to: > > # mount_msdosfs -l /dev/da1s1 /mnt > > I also tried: > > # mount_msdosfs -l /dev/da1 /mnt > > But both versions failed. Finally, in desperation, I formatted the SD card > on a Windows XP laptop. Windows put it back into FAT shape (using the low > level - not the "quick" - format there) and gave it 960 MB, sigh... :-( I am a little lost here and haven't tried a lot on USB devices yet - though I haven't had these kind of problems. But, after doing the fdisk stuff and before trying to mount, did you do a newfs? Another thing would be to try the old dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=512 count=1024 and see if it will write to it and wipe enough stuff to free it up. Up the count if you think it makes any difference. ////jerry > > Regards, > > web... > > -- > William Bulley Email: web@umich.edu > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 19:19:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF60B1065722 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:19:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prad@towardsfreedom.com) Received: from idcmail-mo2no.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo2no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E548FC18 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:19:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prad@towardsfreedom.com) Received: from pd5ml2no-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.153.164]) by pd7mo1no-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2009 12:19:02 -0700 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.0 c=0 a=KoDPwd6_AAAA:8 a=N8V6slddt2NSXhKsDFkA:9 a=jSshwZ_FMUt745o2jfYVKat66pcA:4 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 Received: from s0106000d935c7902.du.shawcable.net (HELO gom.home) ([70.67.160.177]) by pd5ml2no-dmz.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 02 Feb 2009 12:19:02 -0700 Received: from gom.home (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gom.home (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375DF1703D for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:19:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:19:02 -0800 From: prad To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090202111902.52dcd8dd@gom.home> In-Reply-To: References: <4986B7EE.6060103@uni-altai.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.3.1 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: apt of freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:19:05 -0000 On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 11:23:50 +0100 Ivan Voras wrote: > It's probably used for the "Linux emulation" in FreeBSD, you can't use > it with FreeBSD native packages. > so what does this mean? if you have linux emulation, you can install .debs from the debian repository? -- In friendship, prad ... with you on your journey Towards Freedom http://www.towardsfreedom.com (website) Information, Inspiration, Imagination - truly a site for soaring I's From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 19:23:25 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F3071065959 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:23:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231738FC24 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:23:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan-a.emsphone.com [199.67.51.107]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n12JNNEO039758 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:23:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n12JNNgS062026 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:23:23 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n12JNMOm062017; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:23:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:23:21 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Wayne Message-ID: <20090202192320.GK75802@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20090131213315.GE75802@dan.emsphone.com> <832987.51059.qm@web33107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <832987.51059.qm@web33107.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.1, clamav-milter version 0.94.1 on email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:23:24 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ls -lh show file not displaying correct size X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:23:26 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 02), Wayne said: > Thanks for the answer so now for the next question. How do I sync this > file to other FreeBSD servers. I tried using rsync with the --spares > but the size on the other server was on it's way to being the 256G size > and fill up the other server. How would I go about making an exact > duplicate. rsync --sparse seems to work fine for me: (dan@dan.13) /usr/tmp> truncate -s 512M bigfile1 (dan@dan.13) /usr/tmp> ls -lsk bigfile* 1 -rw-r--r-- 1 dan wheel 5368709120 Feb 2 13:09 bigfile1 (dan@dan.13) /usr/tmp> rsync --sparse -v bigfile1 dan:/usr/tmp/bigfile2 sent 536936517 bytes received 31 bytes 2958328.09 bytes/sec total size is 536870912 speedup is 1.00 rsync: U:98.46s S:16.08s E:181.03s CPU:63% Faults:0/1343 I/O:0/0 Swaps:0 (dan@dan.13) /usr/tmp> ls -lsk bigfile* 1 -rw-r--r-- 1 dan wheel 536870912 Feb 2 13:11 bigfile1 1 -rw-r--r-- 1 dan wheel 536870912 Feb 2 13:14 bigfile2 -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 19:28:54 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE4A10656D4 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:28:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: from hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.14.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBDF8FC19 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:28:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: FROM dell1 (Unknown [141.211.15.39]) BY hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 49874974.E3CA2.11225 ; 2 Feb 2009 14:28:52 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:27:20 -0500 From: William Bulley To: Jerry McAllister Message-ID: <20090202192720.GE1012@dell1> Mail-Followup-To: Jerry McAllister , Mel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Mel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: short-changed on SD card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:28:56 -0000 According to Jerry McAllister on Mon, 02/02/09 at 14:12: > > I am a little lost here and haven't tried a lot on USB devices yet - > though I haven't had these kind of problems. > > But, after doing the fdisk stuff and before trying to mount, did you > do a newfs? > > Another thing would be to try the old > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=512 count=1024 > and see if it will write to it and wipe enough stuff to free it up. > Up the count if you think it makes any difference. Thanks. According to the newfs(8) man page it is used only for BSD style file systems (ufs and ufs2). I am okay with the FAT16 formatted SD card, I'm just upset that I paid for a 2.0 GB card and ended up with what seems to be a 1.0 GB card. I would be happy if I could make the SD card look like this: slice 1 2.0 GB (well, 1920 MB if you insist) slice 2 slice 3 slice 4 And I thought I had done just that using fdisk(8). But I must have gotten some of the "beg" and "end" paramaters set up wrong. If the card is indeed 2.0 GB in size, and following in the style of the originally reported parameters of this card: da1: 960MB (1967616 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 960C) that is, 64 "heads", 32 "sectors per track", and 960 "cylinders", (this evidently from what the BIOS reports and understands) I had assumed that I could merely increase the cylinder count up to 1920 and leave the head and sector information as it was. But as I said earlier, this didn't seem to work. I know I have to leave room at the beginning for the MBR or the like, but the tools are either too low level, or too high level, or my understanding of all this is not up to speed. Why can't an SD card advertised (and sold) as a 2.0 GB card actually hold (approximately) 2.0 GB? That is what bugs me... I believe that FAT16 is capable of addressing a 2.0 GB disk drive, yes? Regards, web... -- William Bulley Email: web@umich.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 19:54:22 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2021065678 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:54:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824E48FC52 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:54:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id n12Jqr12023132; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:52:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id n12JqqYS023131; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:52:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:52:52 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Jerry McAllister , Mel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090202195252.GA23080@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20090202192720.GE1012@dell1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090202192720.GE1012@dell1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Jerry McAllister Subject: Re: short-changed on SD card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:54:24 -0000 On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 02:27:20PM -0500, William Bulley wrote: > According to Jerry McAllister on Mon, 02/02/09 at 14:12: > > > > I am a little lost here and haven't tried a lot on USB devices yet - > > though I haven't had these kind of problems. > > > > But, after doing the fdisk stuff and before trying to mount, did you > > do a newfs? > > > > Another thing would be to try the old > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=512 count=1024 > > and see if it will write to it and wipe enough stuff to free it up. > > Up the count if you think it makes any difference. > > Thanks. According to the newfs(8) man page it is used only for BSD > style file systems (ufs and ufs2). I am okay with the FAT16 formatted > SD card, I'm just upset that I paid for a 2.0 GB card and ended up with > what seems to be a 1.0 GB card. I would be happy if I could make the > SD card look like this: > > slice 1 2.0 GB (well, 1920 MB if you insist) > slice 2 > slice 3 > slice 4 > > And I thought I had done just that using fdisk(8). But I must have gotten > some of the "beg" and "end" paramaters set up wrong. OK. I thought you were trying to make a FreeBSD type slice on it, thus the newfs thought. It won't mount if it isn't newfsed and is FreeBSD type. I suppose FreeBSD's fdisk will make MS types, but have never tried it. But, if it will, then it will also do it after wiping the device with dd. After doing that, you should be able to just tell it to turn all the space on the drive in to one slice of whatever type it will handle. ////jerry > > If the card is indeed 2.0 GB in size, and following in the style of the > originally reported parameters of this card: > > da1: 960MB (1967616 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 960C) > > that is, 64 "heads", 32 "sectors per track", and 960 "cylinders", > (this evidently from what the BIOS reports and understands) I had > assumed that I could merely increase the cylinder count up to 1920 > and leave the head and sector information as it was. But as I said > earlier, this didn't seem to work. I know I have to leave room at > the beginning for the MBR or the like, but the tools are either too > low level, or too high level, or my understanding of all this is not > up to speed. Why can't an SD card advertised (and sold) as a 2.0 GB > card actually hold (approximately) 2.0 GB? That is what bugs me... > > I believe that FAT16 is capable of addressing a 2.0 GB disk drive, yes? > > Regards, > > web... > > -- > William Bulley Email: web@umich.edu > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 20:20:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340321065677; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@freebsd.org) Received: from bsdevel.akherb.com (bsdevel.akherb.com [208.86.224.193]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE848FC13; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from beech@freebsd.org) Received: from stargate.akherb.com (163-146-42-72.gci.net [72.42.146.163]) by bsdevel.akherb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDBD28E10E2; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:20:44 +0000 (UTC) From: Beech Rintoul Organization: FreeBSD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:20:42 -0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.1.4; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902021120.43042.beech@freebsd.org> Cc: Beech Rintoul Subject: lpt0 "device busy" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: akbeech@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:20:47 -0000 Just recently I've started having a problem with my HP 5N it was printing fine. Now, whatever I do lpt0 shows "device busy". I've googled reinstalled apsfilter and put the printer through all the self tests (passed) and verified there's nothing in the printer's memory. I've rebuilt userland and kernel. Even tried cups and anything sent to /dev/lpt0 returns that error. dmesg: ppc1: port 0xe800-0xe807,0xe400-0xe407,0xe000-0xe007,0xd800-0xd807,0xd400-0xd407,0xd000-0xd00f irq 21 at device 3.0 on pci3 ppc1: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc1: [ITHREAD] ppbus0: on ppc1 ppbus0: IEEE1284 device found /NIBBLE/ECP/ECP_RLE ppbus0: Probing for PnP devices: ppbus0: PJL,MLC,PCL,PCLXL lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: [ITHREAD] lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 uname: FreeBSD pinnacle.akherb.com 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #70: Mon Feb 2 03:17:26 AKST 2009 root@pinnacle.akherb.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PINNACLE i386 fstat /dev/lpt0 and fstat /pt0.ctl show nothing. Ant attempt at changing settings with lptcontrol also result in a "device busy" error. pinnacle# lptcontrol -p -d /dev/lpt0.ctl lptcontrol: open: Device busy I'm totally at a loss to figure out what's changed does anyone have any suggestions? I really need to get this working. Beech -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Beech Rintoul - FreeBSD Developer - beech@FreeBSD.org /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | FreeBSD Since 4.x \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail | http://people.freebsd.org/~beech X - NO Word docs in e-mail | Skype: akbeech / \ - http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/7.1R/announce.html --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 20:29:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31231065679 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:29:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CE428FC18 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:29:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n12KT66G037530; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:29:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n12KT65H037527; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:29:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 13:29:06 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: William Bulley In-Reply-To: <20090202192720.GE1012@dell1> Message-ID: References: <20090202192720.GE1012@dell1> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 02 Feb 2009 13:29:06 -0700 (MST) Cc: Jerry McAllister , Mel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: short-changed on SD card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:29:08 -0000 On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, William Bulley wrote: > Thanks. According to the newfs(8) man page it is used only for BSD > style file systems (ufs and ufs2). newfs_msdos(8) > I am okay with the FAT16 formatted > SD card, I'm just upset that I paid for a 2.0 GB card and ended up with > what seems to be a 1.0 GB card. I would be happy if I could make the > SD card look like this: > > slice 1 2.0 GB (well, 1920 MB if you insist) > slice 2 > slice 3 > slice 4 It's generally not useful to slice/partition a small SD card. Without a slice table, the whole device is just one slice. Offhand I don't know if you can overwrite an existing slice table (boot block) with just a 'newfs_msdos /dev/da1'. Probably. If not, you can just 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=512 cnt=1' and then do the newfs_msdos. If you plan to use that card in a camera, you are a little safer doing a "full" or "low-level" format with the card in the camera. Some cameras create and like not-quite-right filesystems. Older Canon cameras, for instance. Finally, there are more than a few reports of SD cards with false capacities bought on ebay. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 20:45:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D111065758 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCBD8FC23 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n12KjWVl003453; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:45:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n12KjVBi003450; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:45:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:45:31 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: William Bulley In-Reply-To: <20090202165244.GB1012@dell1> Message-ID: <20090202214453.H3449@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20090202165244.GB1012@dell1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: short-changed on SD card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:45:44 -0000 > > da1: 960MB (1967616 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 960C) it's something wrong with FreeBSD here, it gets detected as 1GB. it has nothing to do with filesystem on it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 20:55:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4E61065859 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmettee@pchotshots.com) Received: from mail.pchotshots.com (mail.pchotshots.com [12.172.123.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C85088FC14 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:55:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bmettee@pchotshots.com) Received: (qmail 3795 invoked by uid 89); 2 Feb 2009 21:00:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dev2.pchotshots.com) (bmettee@12.172.123.228) by mail.pchotshots.com with ESMTPA; 2 Feb 2009 21:00:17 -0000 Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20090202155340.02eed010@mail.pchotshots.com> X-Sender: bmettee@pchotshots.com@mail.pchotshots.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:55:30 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Brad Mettee In-Reply-To: <20090202214453.H3449@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20090202165244.GB1012@dell1> <20090202165244.GB1012@dell1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: short-changed on SD card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 20:55:56 -0000 Grrr - I really don't like that this mailing list default Reply-To is the original author instead of the mailing list itself........ Snip from mis-directed e-mail Does an XP machine also detect it as 960MB? If not, can you put more than 960M on it and verify that it's all intact? Create a 100MB zip file, put 10+ copies on the card. Then test to see if the CRC is correct on all of the copies. If they're alls ok, then the card is in fact 2GB. If you start getting errors on any of the files (and can wipe/repeat the problem), then I'd say you've been ripped off and it's only a 1GB card. At 03:45 PM 2/2/2009, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> da1: 960MB (1967616 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 960C) > >it's something wrong with FreeBSD here, it gets detected as 1GB. >it has nothing to do with filesystem on it. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Brad Mettee PC HotShots, Inc. Baltimore, MD (410) 426-7617 -> Let us bring out the *Power* of your PCs. <- -> Custom Business Software Solutions since 1991 <- visit http://www.pchotshots.com for information about our company. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 21:37:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8FB510656C7 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:37:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slackwarewolf@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A0B8FC18 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:37:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slackwarewolf@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) by QMTA01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id B6Cs1b0270bG4ec519chHr; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:36:41 +0000 Received: from FreeBSD.UNIXMuse.goreBSD.org ([76.112.93.25]) by OMTA03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id B9dD1b0040Yq9Sc3P9dDkM; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:37:13 +0000 Message-ID: <4987678A.5050802@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:37:14 -0500 From: Akenner User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081220) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Patching / Updating / Upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 21:37:14 -0000 Hello all, I've been using this list to my advantage for a while to learn things I can't seem to grasp, and I've gotten great amounts of help. I have a question in regards to the process of patching / Updating / Upgrading I'd like a hand with. I have two machines running FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE and I'd like to make sure I've got security fixes on my test machine. I'm saying test amchine because the box I'm typing this from is an active needed desktop system I'm using for a lot of things right now, and I figured my best bet would be to set up another machine with a similar installation set so I could test out new ideas on that instead of risking breaking something on this one. Anyway, I've been reading up on the CVS idea and asking things about freebsd-update, and I guess my question is more along these lines: If I wanted to just make sure I've got bug fixes and security patches, would CVS or FreeBSD-Update be best for this? Or are they both good for this? I know in the Unix world there are generally a lot of things that do one thing very well but can generally do other things too. I'm reading on CVS right now and it seems I could use this to keep the machine updated, but I'm having some issues understanding the idea of how it works. Basically, if I'm running 7.1-RELEASE, isn't that already the updated version? Or, have I maybe misunderstood something, and the tree RELEASE for 7.1 has bug fixes and security patches added to it, and I could CVSup to the newest release of 7.1 ? Also, FreeBSD-update came across my reading, and it seems to be similar to swaret in the Slackware world. I know it isn't the same thing as BSD seems much more source based than other OSs, but I would like to get at least one of the ways to keep updated picked out, and started using on the test machine to make sure I fully understand it before using it to update my main box. One of the things I did was make two copies of the example CVS standard supfile; one I made in that directory as standard.bak and then I copied a copy of it to the /root directory to look at and maybe edit as well, but as I said, I could use a hand in deciding which option is going to work best. So if anyone could lend a little but in typing out what they use for updates and how they go about it, I'd appreciate it. I've already gotten a full CVSup file sent to me by a member on here which was a great help in deciding how to set up the file. I'm more or less wondering with CVSup if I keep using RELEASE or do I use Stable. And of course if anyone uses freebsd-update if they have suggestions I'd love to hear those as well :) -Allen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 22:23:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A81106566C for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@maydias.com) Received: from pecan2.exetel.com.au (pecan2.exetel.com.au [220.233.0.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B958FC13 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@maydias.com) Received: from 196.43.96.58.exetel.com.au ([58.96.43.196] helo=enterprise.blackthorn.nu) by pecan2.exetel.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1LU7CW-0003Hn-M7; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:23:32 +1100 Message-ID: <49877270.4000005@maydias.com> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:23:44 +1000 From: Warren Liddell User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel References: <498698F9.1030204@maydias.com> <200902020901.13750.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> In-Reply-To: <200902020901.13750.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error compiling Imagmagick X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:23:35 -0000 run make config in graphics/ImageMagick and uncheck the "Run bundled > self-tests after build" option. > This will continue the install. You may want to provide the output of the > failing test through send-pr, so that it can be investigated. > I went around it by using pkg_add From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 22:28:49 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A49C1065706 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:28:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@maydias.com) Received: from smtp.po.exetel.com.au (pecan.exetel.com.au [220.233.0.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAC98FC60 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:28:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shinjii@maydias.com) Received: from 196.43.96.58.exetel.com.au ([58.96.43.196] helo=enterprise.blackthorn.nu) by smtp.po.exetel.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1LU7Ha-0005jd-Om for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:28:47 +1100 Message-ID: <498773AB.2040803@maydias.com> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:28:59 +1000 From: Warren Liddell User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090125) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: error compiling kdebase 4.2 on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:28:51 -0000 Im currently running AMD64 4gig FreebSD7.1-STABLE .. below is the error msg when trying to compile the new KDE4.2 KDEBASE ---------------------------------------------- [ 0%] Building CXX object apps/lib/konq/CMakeFiles/konq.dir/konq_popupmenuinformation.o cd /usr/ports/x11/kdebase4/work/kdebase-4.2.0/build/apps/lib/konq && /usr/bin/c++ -D_GNU_SOURCE -DQT_NO_STL -DQT_NO_CAST_TO_ASCII -D_REENTRANT -DKDE_DEPRECATED_WARNINGS -DMAKE_KONQ_LIB -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Woverloaded-virtual -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -O2 -DNDEBUG -DQT_NO_DEBUG -fPIC -I/usr/ports/x11/kdebase4/work/kdebase-4.2.0/build/apps/lib/konq -I/usr/ports/x11/kdebase4/work/kdebase-4.2.0/apps/lib/konq -I/usr/ports/x11/kdebase4/work/kdebase-4.2.0/build/apps -I/usr/ports/x11/kdebase4/work/kdebase-4.2.0/build -I/usr/local/kde4/include -I/usr/local/kde4/include/KDE -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtXmlPatterns -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtWebKit -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtHelp -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtAssistant -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtDBus -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtTest -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtUiTools -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtScript -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtSvg -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtXml -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtSql -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtOpenGL -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtNetwork -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtDesigner -I/usr/local/include/qt4/Qt3Support -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtGui -I/usr/local/include/qt4/QtCore -I/usr/local/include/qt4/Qt -I/usr/local/share/qt4/mkspecs/default -I/usr/local/include/qt4 -I/usr/local/include -o CMakeFiles/konq.dir/konq_popupmenuinformation.o -c /usr/ports/x11/kdebase4/work/kdebase-4.2.0/apps/lib/konq/konq_popupmenuinformation.cpp /usr/ports/x11/kdebase4/work/kdebase-4.2.0/apps/lib/konq/konq_popupmenuinformation.cpp: In member function 'void KonqPopupMenuInformation::setItems(const KFileItemList&)': /usr/ports/x11/kdebase4/work/kdebase-4.2.0/apps/lib/konq/konq_popupmenuinformation.cpp:69: error: 'const class KFileItemList' has no member named 'targetUrlList' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdebase4/work/kdebase-4.2.0/build. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdebase4/work/kdebase-4.2.0/build. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdebase4/work/kdebase-4.2.0/build. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kdebase4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/kde4. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 22:34:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0792F106568E for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:34:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from woodbine.london.02.net (woodbine.london.02.net [87.194.255.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE37C8FC0C for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from [192.168.1.72] (93.97.24.219) by woodbine.london.02.net (8.5.016.1) id 4979BCBF00126F8C; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:22:49 +0000 Message-ID: <49877238.40507@onetel.com> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:22:48 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= References: <1bd550a00902020030q418d3dard3182490496f706e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1bd550a00902020030q418d3dard3182490496f706e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Screen problem on booting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:34:02 -0000 Fernando Apesteguía wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm using FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p2 > > Since a few days I've noticed something weird. On booting, all the > text I see is shifted to the left, so I lose the first ten letters or > so in every line of text. > > After login, once I type "startx" the X Window system seems to be OK > _and_ if I go back to a console with Alt-Ctrl-Fn the console is fine > again. > > My graphic card is an ATI Radeon HD2400. > > Anybody noticed it? > > Thanks in advance. > > PS: In console mode, reset command doesn't fix the problem. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Adjust the horizontal position with the controls on the monitor while booting? My LCD flat panel has an auto adjust button which does the same thing. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 22:41:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46890106564A for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: from ik-out-1112.google.com (ik-out-1112.google.com [66.249.90.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84ED8FC14 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:41:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonic2000gr@gmail.com) Received: by ik-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id c21so464839ika.3 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:41:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1ZvnDLcprPQDQxIwrOxq7GkZ0TTXQ1f1VBkLuLUm3NI=; b=sgGQGwk2yKbyhhyMTt0JRoZf0no2BEWYYlVMXXmJYZTdS1UFxzaIEvKWcadI5EXbDt aEQHtlxIiPm/0r8v+EJMDyHxnDIoIfnRUTinQ2OxlMvzkUS4YymaO63d1GW7hUoITd3g 1emm/SVDRCg3auSoglTLvjzacZxHk1hi0QMOE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=l6Cd9/lkuKyyo68XXjbVGdzWJJZGuih3Ian5nKN9aootkHDsY+OfDbsJlumzhkc+1+ J3xd0xpuCNqdY0Nu0No7zJcebqGqTi1XAdDhL1Yw9XHIHXsFcPUF7qT/VBwglpDSEYg2 FPJDYjuKppyIi9uelMEtv///MxmBWrB5Wyi6g= Received: by 10.67.115.2 with SMTP id s2mr1784328ugm.62.1233614490662; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:41:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from atlantis.dyndns.org (athedsl-4559607.home.otenet.gr [94.70.94.255]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e23sm469247ugd.54.2009.02.02.14.41.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:41:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49877697.8030607@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:41:27 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20081011) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Akenner References: <4987678A.5050802@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <4987678A.5050802@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patching / Updating / Upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:41:32 -0000 Akenner wrote: > Hello all, > > I've been using this list to my advantage for a while to learn things > I can't seem to grasp, and I've gotten great amounts of help. > > I have a question in regards to the process of patching / Updating / > Upgrading I'd like a hand with. I have two machines running FreeBSD > 7.1-RELEASE and I'd like to make sure I've got security fixes on my > test machine. I'm saying test amchine because the box I'm typing this > from is an active needed desktop system I'm using for a lot of things > right now, and I figured my best bet would be to set up another > machine with a similar installation set so I could test out new ideas > on that instead of risking breaking something on this one. Definitely a good idea, if you have machines to spare. > > Anyway, I've been reading up on the CVS idea and asking things about > freebsd-update, and I guess my question is more along these lines: > > If I wanted to just make sure I've got bug fixes and security patches, > would CVS or FreeBSD-Update be best for this? Or are they both good > for this? I know in the Unix world there are generally a lot of things > that do one thing very well but can generally do other things too. For getting just the security fixes for your -RELEASE version, freebsd-update is by far the easiest way to go. Only thing you need to do is run: # freebsd-update fetch # freebsd-update install These can even be combined into one: # freebsd-update fetch install Depending on whether a new kernel was installed, you may or may not have to reboot. (it is easy to see on the messages whether a new /boot/kernel/kernel file was installed). If you are using a custom kernel, the process is slightly more involved: Every time the updates touch the kernel, you will have to rebuild your custom kernel. If you know nothing on custom kernels (yet) you are running GENERIC and you just need the above procedure. For details, please refer to: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html (esp. sect 24.2.2) > > I'm reading on CVS right now and it seems I could use this to keep the > machine updated, but I'm having some issues understanding the idea of > how it works. Basically, if I'm running 7.1-RELEASE, isn't that > already the updated version? Or, have I maybe misunderstood something, > and the tree RELEASE for 7.1 has bug fixes and security patches added > to it, and I could CVSup to the newest release of 7.1 ? > 7.1 is the latest RELEASE. Although new feature will not be added into it, you could use csup/cvsup to get the security fixes. These would be the same as the ones you can get (without recompiling anything) with freebsd-update as described above. If you really wish to track a development version of FreeBSD, you can use CVSup to get 7-STABLE (this is the continuing development branch, based on the work of 7.1. In the future, developments from this branch will get us to 7.2-RELEASE). Or, if you are really adventurous, you could try running -CURRENT (which will in time become FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE). More info is here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html If you just need the security updates for 7.1-RELEASE, freebsd-update is really the painless way to go. But CVSup can also do it, and it will be a nice exercise ;) > Also, FreeBSD-update came across my reading, and it seems to be > similar to swaret in the Slackware world. I know it isn't the same > thing as BSD seems much more source based than other OSs, but I would > like to get at least one of the ways to keep updated picked out, and > started using on the test machine to make sure I fully understand it > before using it to update my main box. > Go ahead and use it on your main system. Freebsd-update is safe (you can even rollback the updates if need be). As I said, unless you are running a custom kernel (and you are not probably), this is just two commands. And there no other settings needed beforehand. > One of the things I did was make two copies of the example CVS > standard supfile; one I made in that directory as standard.bak and > then I copied a copy of it to the /root directory to look at and maybe > edit as well, but as I said, I could use a hand in deciding which > option is going to work best. > If you decide to go the CVSup way for the security fixes, you would need to make sure you have this line: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_7_1 (This is already in the standard supfile normally) To move to 7-STABLE, you would need to change it to: *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_7 (You will find this in the sample stable-supfile) Then, follow the instructions in chapter 24. If you are getting confused with the many different possible tags, this will probably make them clear: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html > So if anyone could lend a little but in typing out what they use for > updates and how they go about it, I'd appreciate it. I've already > gotten a full CVSup file sent to me by a member on here which was a > great help in deciding how to set up the file. I'm more or less > wondering with CVSup if I keep using RELEASE or do I use Stable. > If you are just beginning with FreeBSD, I suggest you run RELEASE for a while, at least for your main system. But since you got a test machine go ahead and try everything :) The experience will be useful when the time comes to apply it to your main system. > And of course if anyone uses freebsd-update if they have suggestions > I'd love to hear those as well :) > Well, I'd say use it for the security updates. Read the Handbook section to see its other uses, but if you are staying with release, freebsd-update is a quick and safe way to update. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 22:53:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3500710656C4 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:53:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f17.google.com (mail-fx0-f17.google.com [209.85.220.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897A08FC13 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:52:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kitchetech@gmail.com) Received: by fxm10 with SMTP id 10so2614fxm.19 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:52:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=fQ1N9BCUF1bnH8/f1HsmvsvNQWXPS0MHQC4aQMHGc1Q=; b=vaIAysWSDU27E1f+Fh3fkPIhL+mwr9Axbwce1LjpjYJX7qSYvneY0aaVFAATMeAXPF 3nRjGDZyD+FKRLC1bzcuCdoy4y0XkEGSZCLVij9PYGCoIhy4FbQnqGlvEFBOn2TQ4J+J acTTtKMnyAmiXNa1CrkmSfepJb7yh3fQcZPtI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=W2W6Ylg9UxavwboxpRQuoAy7z1naE5+wvWTI4oDt4iv9BLl+bopcLt9VvcnOKwUbQr 4EQjgyoN6fM6lUsv0Q11vSEvnF64Tabr0DppuYQYdjD7Xsv41BAfz6z7ZYiuidArVFvn QIP85gILkitN9r6jnOKX0kXdv1rv9P0nECc1Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.181.159.17 with SMTP id l17mr335256bko.14.1233615158590; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:52:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <49877270.4000005@maydias.com> References: <498698F9.1030204@maydias.com> <200902020901.13750.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <49877270.4000005@maydias.com> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:52:38 -0500 Message-ID: <28283d910902021452l40000fdfle16eceee74f07789@mail.gmail.com> From: matt donovan To: Warren Liddell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Mel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error compiling Imagmagick X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:53:00 -0000 On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Warren Liddell wrote: > run make config in graphics/ImageMagick and uncheck the "Run bundled > >> self-tests after build" option. >> This will continue the install. You may want to provide the output of the >> failing test through send-pr, so that it can be investigated. >> >> > > I went around it by using pkg_add > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Believe this is a well known problem anyways. Since this is the 10th time or so that I have seen the errors for PerlMagick tests on this mailing list From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 22:53:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D85C510656D1 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:53:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f21.google.com (mail-gx0-f21.google.com [209.85.217.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782F18FC13 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:53:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: by gxk14 with SMTP id 14so1799091gxk.19 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:53:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cH8k4avlbOBsgLXzDKggQZCrnmwl9oeNpupcazSOTSM=; b=WxzG2kdYfCN5cLdo8m2BKFL5H0be3iH9satmxBbb4twHdjy7eQOBqFA8c2JI2uM5rp kYuwQ3w3DGgeApoZM5iab9aAg0hWWMhxyaz9nnwALdfu2jFmCoTD7EYDN5zCQ/UOu2Lr mJCCVrc58RpdT0LpHGdagkLkW/BNhWPCKd334= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=DGf2zEpdBEIvikBMpl3Fqg2aSPq8g5gKVIESILs2QxxGYBveMxPjeliyesaEGf4W8N a9j+37oQs2GiY2EIUUw1otUI4Dte6MoCubp+M8A2+/LdF/uV+Hbq8v7tXUxXymwOuPbG FvxRfqMy1RQv3CegH9viRF1b47sCp7XWoO5ZY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.20.65 with SMTP id e1mr597512ibb.1.1233615213994; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:53:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <613985.35234.qm@web52104.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <613985.35234.qm@web52104.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:53:33 -0700 Message-ID: From: Tim Judd To: ipfreak@yahoo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd general questions Subject: Re: freebsd and multicasting software X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:53:37 -0000 On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 3:46 PM, gahn wrote: > Hi, all: > > Does anyone know multicasting packages (udp based) that I can test on the > freebsd? I am using 6.3 and it comes with vlc-0.8.6i and doesn't support udp > streaming. > > Any help would be greatly appreciated.. udpcast? http://udpcast.linux.lu/ It's one of my goals to play with this software in greater detail so I can truly evaluate it and give it my own personal (for my own personal needs) thumbs up or down. G'luck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 23:04:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945B8106566C for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:04:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f21.google.com (mail-gx0-f21.google.com [209.85.217.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339CC8FC08 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:04:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: by gxk14 with SMTP id 14so1803421gxk.19 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:04:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=8PYra6f6Uoh6IfgJRTw1xQQVHXrMqq5+rJBoQfah/eA=; b=MRjqWgzbjJ3FZEzKmcilb6BJK3/p236S6aH9zpLmLMyQi59O9IYUIcoy1SYD7hlmC+ h5qKvX3/8ZvCHE4snWTCXo0kKjRvxfFa3p42yBxI4xEmad/fKu9z3WrDEnmjI1ox+uOQ Qjybbq0GZpAx3jPz0ZXNhSk0STeIYjlYLs5q0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mz6xOo3dIvbGTiVnJU93HpIREIuXtu4I06e4wfXqUtGRAjGaSjkHwWoC4aCiC6zww5 rzSL1EMR3MTifRx6gs+jNYecqkEnUL+BAOz16nHLolDxsT60+eM4Nl/aHHTfSBG+SsFx /Pwg6WGufRSJh23k0wNpG4vVp2a9MNrNZ5nGI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.16.74 with SMTP id n10mr374199iba.23.1233615878199; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:04:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <75a268720902020618v2ba3c798s9a6c011d107cb1a8@mail.gmail.com> References: <75a268720902020618v2ba3c798s9a6c011d107cb1a8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:04:38 -0700 Message-ID: From: Tim Judd To: Omer Faruk Sen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs root partition boot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:04:40 -0000 On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 7:18 AM, Omer Faruk Sen wrote: > Hi, > > Can I use zfs on / using FreeBSD 7.1? I also use > http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/mirror/script to create mirror is > there such a a tool for ZFS to use on Fbsd 7.1? > > Regards. > Are you sure you want to do this? ZFS is still marked an experimental feature last time I checked; and if FreeBSD decides to kill ZFS support, you'll be stuck with a unbootable disk. I'd stick with the more mature, tested methods like gmirror or gvinum. Nothing beats a hardware raid though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 23:13:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CF31065673 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from el-out-1112.google.com (el-out-1112.google.com [209.85.162.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A108FC14 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:13:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id r27so1133664ele.13 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:13:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=z7wvgbTNo54LHvnmvDaXLTm6018lPhIzUBRMhs2UDwY=; b=TzR7vB77TBuuu/pYG/MkwYqjykJTOdXx3uN6crXV2fcUdBiloEGxhdH8a143MUH9ns ETCsogY7zQFStHayDkW+JwHl7nieOOogr7266BtQvWv87KRlXNTxhaEzsIedxKkVsGW9 iPzCkjbp7amGV4AS6H1AMkvSTz+wzYxjAiG5Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=puX+jbMJYbzJbJvW/WRoxStYEC7EDB2LoNvi9y3saVCJaNtWMmEeOW90cGn8xs9a7/ wZL+lnTueWW46847vJfXI6nlBj9A0nA7rx7P2qhnoaBbbLshB1Y3LjWVWpVEa8ElEaNC yLXb3boNIQqARuGj6wiLosY3gsww2UdNjCIsM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.19.204 with SMTP id c12mr602357ibb.5.1233616396119; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:13:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090202214453.H3449@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20090202165244.GB1012@dell1> <20090202214453.H3449@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 16:13:16 -0700 Message-ID: From: Tim Judd To: Wojciech Puchar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: William Bulley , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: short-changed on SD card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:13:17 -0000 On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Wojciech Puchar < wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > >> da1: 960MB (1967616 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 960C) >> > > it's something wrong with FreeBSD here, it gets detected as 1GB. > it has nothing to do with filesystem on it. Nobody's blamed the SD/CF reader. I call dibs to blame the SD/CF reader. Isolate the problem to find the culprit... Check the USB reader -- I'm curious to see if that fixes the problem. And FYI -- No matter the Heads/Sectors/Cylinders, there are ~2000000 512byte sectors, roughly equal to 1GB. If it's not the adapter, you got cheated in the purchase. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 23:48:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3901065687 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:48:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E3F8FC16 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:48:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n12NmhYB003974; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:48:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) with ESMTP id n12Nmftd003971; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:48:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:48:41 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Tim Judd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090203004813.A3970@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <75a268720902020618v2ba3c798s9a6c011d107cb1a8@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Omer Faruk Sen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs root partition boot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:48:51 -0000 > FreeBSD decides to kill ZFS support, you'll be stuck with a unbootable > disk. I'd stick with the more mature, tested methods like gmirror or > gvinum. Nothing beats a hardware raid though. IMHO "hardware" RAID beats nothing. it's mostly crap. gmirror/gstripe/gconcat works well and always From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 00:02:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84B9106567E for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:02:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9408FC14 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:02:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tajudd@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b38so742287ana.13 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:02:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=t0mlyFDYBcMoS9fu3lwzYT1BbkXLQzZOFt9fAcSSPSE=; b=D8CvK4O2x3K56MbNX0fHfY1ZCGMfguYESHOu2C2T9FZRhyJV+2taNVTG9iKWwyP61g gMsNy208oQDX/+QbG3NOWsJfC9mDzM3zyAavW4GPVtBWOeAYSB/UbRGRiR+zZT70yA85 XB3gMjaBMFUXMjpl7ZdWKlySQfz3VA+Bda7Tc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=gqOWNuXBafNzn95CCs9ekIaFjDF0f0m5EzKfOoXJ3UioYhV7T7yg98KRV/LhgGXPyW aDkvG+suHl5u5zu/KJ2GNEGQnj8pxftCFGj5eMwPRpIfZRcNpzTl9B2tp419sa6gOBBM dggwom8tOnC3A7znY3T79ZP8qZDzUHCJl9q4Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.12.12 with SMTP id v12mr603735ibv.4.1233619322247; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:02:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090203004813.A3970@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <75a268720902020618v2ba3c798s9a6c011d107cb1a8@mail.gmail.com> <20090203004813.A3970@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:02:02 -0700 Message-ID: From: Tim Judd To: Wojciech Puchar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Omer Faruk Sen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs root partition boot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:02:04 -0000 On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Wojciech Puchar < wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > FreeBSD decides to kill ZFS support, you'll be stuck with a unbootable >> disk. I'd stick with the more mature, tested methods like gmirror or >> gvinum. Nothing beats a hardware raid though. >> > IMHO "hardware" RAID beats nothing. it's mostly crap. > > gmirror/gstripe/gconcat works well and always > Yes, each person will have their own unique view. To dismiss or put down someone else's view seems unrational There are times I prefer software raid, there are times I prefer hardware raid, neither of which will solve 100% of the problems 100% of the time. My point still stands that **IF** FreeBSD decides to kill ZFS support, you'll be SOL. And quote the source PROPERLY next time. The 2 letter word you DID NOT quote me on makes a difference in the point I was making. If you want to exchange flames, remove the -questions email list from the recipients. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 00:38:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E8DB10656D9 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jeays@rogers.com) Received: from smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9FF098FC22 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jeays@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 92021 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2009 00:38:37 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=i/Dz9Jc9PnwFLAmhKxnaylZtohNaL6IsLzDJH3mc6u0HXMtCOWYFFku27p4QhLBHmciRMuaFhujAQ49D9w+HIiIijT4OaQ8QBJMpS6/0eViyd+jU+5emawwW0De5bLaWOhhgCu+XXS98GCHLESLp5ad+4ES5vu7zN4Agz92Q4/c= ; Received: from unknown (HELO napoleon.localnet) (mike.jeays@99.224.75.182 with plain) by smtp107.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 2009 00:38:36 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: zKJz.2YVM1kLa82nLscVZzygdhPFg5iymCllhQxr5B8OAdqCy94ufNAhE3HAnTgtnw-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 From: Mike Jeays To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:38:34 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27-9-generic; KDE/4.1.3; i686; ; ) References: <20090202165244.GB1012@dell1> <20090202214453.H3449@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200902021938.35285.mike.jeays@rogers.com> Subject: Re: short-changed on SD card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:38:41 -0000 On February 2, 2009 06:13:16 pm Tim Judd wrote: > On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Wojciech Puchar < > > wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> wrote: > >> da1: 960MB (1967616 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 960C) > > > > it's something wrong with FreeBSD here, it gets detected as 1GB. > > it has nothing to do with filesystem on it. > > Nobody's blamed the SD/CF reader. > > I call dibs to blame the SD/CF reader. Isolate the problem to find the > culprit... > > Check the USB reader -- I'm curious to see if that fixes the problem. > > And FYI -- No matter the Heads/Sectors/Cylinders, there are ~2000000 > 512byte sectors, roughly equal to 1GB. > > If it's not the adapter, you got cheated in the purchase. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I think I would try dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=1M without the count option, and see how many blocks it writes. You at least start with a clean slate, and can run fdisk and newfs, if you want a BSD-only device. Make sure you write on the right device! -- Mike Jeays http://www.jeays.ca http://www.rotarycpmm.ca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 01:33:40 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CA0106564A for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:33:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au) Received: from angel.comcen.com.au (angel.comcen.com.au [203.23.236.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDD78FC13 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:33:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au) Received: from [192.168.0.199] (unknown [202.172.126.254]) by angel.comcen.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D075C2EEF3 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:35:00 +1100 (EST) From: Da Rock To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <49860ABC.1030205@system.pl> References: <49837CFD.4080603@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <49860ABC.1030205@system.pl> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 11:33:10 +1000 Message-Id: <1233624790.1092.1.camel@laptop2.herveybayaustralia.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Xorg upgrade disaster: Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:33:40 -0000 On Sun, 2009-02-01 at 21:49 +0100, Marcin Cieslak wrote: > O. Hartmann wrote: > > After upgrading one of my FreeBSD 8.0-CUR/amd64 boxes to new xorg-7.4 > > and having done hurting recompiling nearly everything/package twice now > > firefox3 still doesn't work properly and hits me when starting with this > > error message: > > > > Xlib: extension "Generic Event Extension" missing on display ":0.0". > > > Looks like libraries (Xext among others) already support the XGE extension: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.freedesktop.xorg/36483 > > but the current the 1.5 Xorg server does not support and the 1.6 release > is behind schedule a bit: > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Njg4OA > > I keep getting this error after upgrade of X today but everything works > as usual. > Except for me: I have mplayer not working as well as other misc X progs. Same error... > > Then firefox3 freezes forever, showing something like the background or > > pixel remnants of windows/picograms moving over its window. > > The firefox problem is unrelated I think to the message above (as > demonstrated later in the thred) > > --Marcin > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 02:05:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A6B106566C for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 02:05:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd-questions@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from mail.skepsi.net (mail.skepsi.net [208.86.225.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 897BC8FC12 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 02:05:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd-questions@sentinelchicken.net) Received: (qmail 27635 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2009 21:47:42 -0000 Received: from d60-65-239-208.col.wideopenwest.com (HELO pilot.skepsi.net) (65.60.208.239) by mail.skepsi.net with SMTP; 2 Feb 2009 21:47:42 -0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 30986 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:30:16 -0000 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:30:16 -0500 From: Jason Morgan To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090203013015.GA22084@skepsi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: mutt/1.5.18 (FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE) Subject: Build/install failure in textproc/docbook-sk: catalog parsing error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:05:31 -0000 Greetings, I am having trouble installing xorg on a fairly clean machine. The problem stems from a failed build/install of textproc/docbook-sk, which seems to have been pulled in from HAL. Does someone know if this is a known issue, or if it's possibly some problem with my system specifically? Is there a work-around---I've already tried to deinstall all ports and begin from scratch? Does a default install of xorg, including HAL, really need docbook? Should I submit a PR? Details below: $ uname -a FreeBSD crichton.skepsi.net 7.1-STABLE FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE #3: Sun Feb 1 21:24:47 EST 2009 root@crichton.skepsi.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CRICHTON i386 $ cd /usr/ports/textproc/docbook-sk $ make install clean ===> Installing for docbook-sk-4.1.2_4 ===> docbook-sk-4.1.2_4 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/xmlcatmgr - found ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if textproc/docbook-sk already installed xmlcatmgr: missing XML declaration; invalid document xmlcatmgr: catalog does not look like an XML file; missing prolog xmlcatmgr: errors while parsing catalog; aborting *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/textproc/docbook-sk. Like I said, this is a fairly clean machine: $ pkg_info bash-3.2.48_1 The GNU Project's Bourne Again SHell docbook-1.4 Meta-port for the different versions of the DocBook DTD docbook-4.1_3 V4.1 of the DocBook DTD, designed for technical documentation docbook-4.2 V4.2 of the DocBook DTD, designed for technical documentation docbook-4.3 DocBook/SGML DTD V4.3, designed for technical documentation docbook-4.4 DocBook/SGML DTD V4.4, designed for technical documentation docbook-4.5 DocBook/SGML DTD V4.5, designed for technical documentation docbook-xml-4.2_1 XML version of the DocBook DTD docbook-xml-4.3 DocBook/XML DTD V4.3, designed for technical documentation docbook-xml-4.4 DocBook/XML DTD V4.4, designed for technical documentation docbook-xml-4.5 DocBook/XML DTD V4.5, designed for technical documentation gettext-0.17_1 GNU gettext package libiconv-1.11_1 A character set conversion library libtool-1.5.26 Generic shared library support script portmaster-2.6 Manage your ports without external databases or languages unzip-5.52_5 List, test and extract compressed files in a ZIP archive xmlcatmgr-2.2 SGML and XML catalog manager Thanks for your time. -- ~ Jason Morgan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 03:02:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA79C106564A for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 03:02:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from imedmobility.com (host-50.216-16-29.iw.net [216.16.29.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A1E8FC1D for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 03:02:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from midco.net (host-47-73-107-208.midco.net [208.107.73.47]) by imedmobility.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C281173C98 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 21:02:04 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4987B38D.4000207@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:01:33 +0000 From: Adam Vande More User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081225) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: How to tell what $var assigned PORTVERSION equals. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:02:06 -0000 How does one find out the PORTVERSION of a port when it's in a format like such: PORTVERSION= ${KDE4_VERSION} All the docs/examples I can find easily show PORTVERSION assigned a number, not variable. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 03:07:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28CE106566B for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 03:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eitanadlerlist@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF56C8FC08 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 03:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eitanadlerlist@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so1898162rvf.43 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:07:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ymaFRTM2NQB6yvnTWiZTYxjwiK9qzVoE+oSLZ13NUF4=; b=BLmB3Tn9P9atgqOP4TzcmbP+VPrLlTL0Qdu4AvNmc4sBEcvvMEplev9UxXZxykJ1/C 9u5ZKmDNGWrhX/cVvdXw+WJFh4HnF77UZFSdqR2PKNGIXvKUXNhwf5Vp1ld/GDeNSkMi boWFDii4Ltiw5zvYmZrZHcAl5nuuMDLnkKxt0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=g0EToAaI8eL2yeiqNQi9Oh+uRFKR+CY1aRFqZrq3iloHoSZoRzwat6CLuYuhiIKG6g JhQ8lGR1P6Sa21Zdjl+H5+oGjtYCT0RSiZB5448Rq1Aeq2vggNf+1w6bUexWlRTyUAit nEy9Pnea9uvixsNTxrqCq/liBUzjmM7xaYwsI= Received: by 10.142.165.14 with SMTP id n14mr2117547wfe.349.1233630422410; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:07:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from aargh.lan (ool-182fcc8b.dyn.optonline.net [24.47.204.139]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm8971486wfi.58.2009.02.02.19.07.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:07:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4987B4D1.40008@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:06:57 -0500 From: Eitan Adler User-Agent: Mozilla (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; ) Gecko Thunderbird Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More References: <4987B38D.4000207@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4987B38D.4000207@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 OpenPGP: id=E9C2CCD1; url=pgp.mit.edu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to tell what $var assigned PORTVERSION equals. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:07:03 -0000 Adam Vande More wrote: > How does one find out the PORTVERSION of a port when it's in a format > like such: > > PORTVERSION= ${KDE4_VERSION} cd /usr/ports grep -R KDE4_VERSION . ./Mk/bsd.kde4.mk:KDE4_VERSION= 4.1.4 > > All the docs/examples I can find easily show PORTVERSION assigned a > number, not variable. > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Eitan Adler "Security is increased by designing for the way humans actually behave." -Jakob Nielsen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 04:35:27 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CF21065672 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:35:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BAEC8FC16 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 04:35:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan-a.emsphone.com [199.67.51.107]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n134ZQnT093732 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:35:26 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n134ZPnw069626 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:35:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n134ZNH9069622; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:35:23 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2009 22:35:23 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Adam Vande More Message-ID: <20090203043523.GL75802@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4987B38D.4000207@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4987B38D.4000207@gmail.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 7.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.1, clamav-milter version 0.94.1 on email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:35:26 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to tell what $var assigned PORTVERSION equals. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:35:27 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 03), Adam Vande More said: > How does one find out the PORTVERSION of a port when it's in a format > like such: > > PORTVERSION= ${KDE4_VERSION} > > All the docs/examples I can find easily show PORTVERSION assigned a > number, not variable. Running "make -V PORTVERSION" asks make to print what the variable is without actually building the port itself. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 05:08:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C1B106566C for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:08:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (pool-173-50-231-101.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [173.50.231.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064098FC0C for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 05:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: by sopwith.solgatos.com (Postfix, from userid 66) id 67570B64F; Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:56:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id AAA14230; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:28:04 GMT Message-Id: <200902030028.AAA14230@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:28:04 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: getting oddball boundary quirk reading Samsung disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:08:34 -0000 I'm attempting to dig my way out of the Seagate 7200.11 firmware disaster. Need a non-7200.11 place to store my data before messing with the drives. Trying a Samsung. disk: Samsung HD103UJ 1TB SATA controller: nforce4-ultra FreeBSD 7.0 amd64 Brand new disk. Running a few tests before entrusting data to it. I read the entire disk with dd of=/dev/null, it ran fine. I wrote the entire disk with 0x55, it ran fine. I read the entire disk with dd piped to hexdump, I get quirks at 2 oddball spots. Reading 1 sector at a time works fine. Reading 2 sectors gives i/o error. Repeatable. If there was a boundary quirk (like the one at the lba48 boundary on Seagates) I would expect an error the first time I read the disk (before writing 0x55). Read ahead is listed as supported and enabled, so the data should be in the disk's cache when reading with bs=1024. # dd if=/dev/ad6 bs=512 skip=1936787900 count=1 | hexdump -C 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 512 bytes transferred in 0.000160 secs (3200423 bytes/sec) 00000000 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 |UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU| * 00000200 # dd if=/dev/ad6 bs=512 skip=1936787901 count=1 | hexdump -C 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 512 bytes transferred in 0.000155 secs (3303821 bytes/sec) 00000000 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 |UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU| * 00000200 # dd if=/dev/ad6 bs=1024 skip=1936787900 count=1 | hexdump -C dd: /dev/ad6: Input/output error 0+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes transferred in 0.000104 secs (0 bytes/sec) # # dd if=/dev/ad6 bs=512 skip=1939213518 count=1 | hexdump -C 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 512 bytes transferred in 0.000152 secs (3365962 bytes/sec) 00000000 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 |UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU| * 00000200 # dd if=/dev/ad6 bs=512 skip=1939213519 count=1 | hexdump -C 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 512 bytes transferred in 0.000260 secs (1970168 bytes/sec) 00000000 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 |UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU| * 00000200 # dd if=/dev/ad6 bs=1024 skip=1939213518 count=1 | hexdump -C dd: /dev/ad6: Input/output error 0+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes transferred in 0.000101 secs (0 bytes/sec) # ad6: FAILURE - READ_DMA48 status=51 error=40 LBA=1936787980 ad6: FAILURE - READ_DMA48 status=51 error=40 LBA=1939213518 ad6: FAILURE - READ_DMA48 status=51 error=40 LBA=1939213518 Running the test again isn't generating additional errors to console/dmesg. I ran the same incoming inspection test on Seagates, including a couple of 1 TB (exact same number of sectors as the Samsung), and it ran fine. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 07:26:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D8D106566B for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:26:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Apitz@oclc.org) Received: from mail.pica.nl (mail.pica.nl [192.87.44.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8C38FC1B for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Apitz@oclc.org) Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de ([10.0.1.29]) by mail.pica.nl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:26:48 +0100 Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id n137QlAC002452; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:26:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to matthias.apitz@oclc.org using -f Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:26:47 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Mel Message-ID: <20090203072647.GA2425@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20090202085740.GA4654@rebelion.Sisis.de> <200902020856.39396.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20090202180459.GA2625@rebelion.Sisis.de> <200902020934.38501.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <200902020934.38501.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE (i386) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2009 07:26:49.0131 (UTC) FILETIME=[C6C5BFB0:01C985D0] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no cats at home, but system (7.0-STABLE) reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 07:26:51 -0000 El día Monday, February 02, 2009 a las 09:34:38AM -0900, Mel escribió: > > but the other messages (you have cut out) says that it run through shutdown > > at 23:06:33 and later at 23:42:42 it did a normal re-boot while I was > > sleeping already; this does not make sense; don't you agree? > > > > Right, I'm not awake yet. 36 minutes is odd. The only scenario I can think of: > - acpi shutdown did not work, it was instead a 'halt' and in your sleep you > pressed the any key to start the reboot ;) > > You can see if shutdown works properly by shutdown -p NOW. Then try the same > using the power button, just in case there's something different. If that all > works, search for monkeys. Both worked fine in bring the system to halt and power-off state; I'm always using the power button and never ever saw this problem; I'm searching for monkeys or intruders ... matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.oclc.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 07:28:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63A41065736 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: from mail.procreditbank.bg (mail.procreditbank.bg [193.26.216.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9D9A8FC20 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:28:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from i.tanusheff@procreditbank.bg) Received: (qmail 78136 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2009 09:28:12 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO domino.procreditbank.bg) (10.0.0.15) by 192.168.1.3 with SMTP; 3 Feb 2009 09:28:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <769541.13800.qm@web52112.mail.re2.yahoo.com> To: ipfreak@yahoo.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 7.0.3 September 26, 2007 From: Ivailo Tanusheff Message-ID: Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:28:09 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on DOMINO/BULGARIA/PROCREDITBANK(Release 7.0.2FP2|May 14, 2007) at 03.02.2009 09:28:14, Serialize complete at 03.02.2009 09:28:14 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd general questions , owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: intel 64-bit version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 07:28:15 -0000 You may use amd64 version for full support of the 64 functionalities. Do not get the wrong impression, this is not only for AMD processors and allow you to use the full strength of the 64 bit architecture. You may also use i386 branch and use PAE config options if you have more than 4 GB RAM. Still, the best idea is to use amd64 version. Regards, Ivailo Tanusheff Deputy Head of IT Department ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD gahn Sent by: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 02.02.2009 16:25 Please respond to ipfreak@yahoo.com To freebsd general questions cc Subject intel 64-bit version? Hi all: What is the image for intel 64-bit version of freebsd? i have xeon machine and would like to install freebsd on it. Thanks _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 07:34:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F1E106564A for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:34:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f21.google.com (mail-ew0-f21.google.com [209.85.219.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B773E8FC08 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:34:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by ewy14 with SMTP id 14so2874822ewy.19 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:34:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=odHfIJu+5qTzYPh6avuh9EihQChvku2ZkB6VcNwGnDo=; b=v/PL2l7SrkVgaEA5vIoMVyhcB7vmWbE+ZgziYWDSDQxk9vTIhunwhzUEdfWEkP01/+ 4DD1YIZbC7k7C3Rqhq2tP+wbx/f109JzOpCYi5NVlERr2x/b/LO6yISzPacKQ5fRU8To whPZQBrC8Amgok/6Z9q4+AccG2AI4VyL/hm4s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QUmJc25QRjxfYdllisjGgIwFmOYVTtqHRLt2kE7rFs1pbyO2f1O4CHroj0ZlcAlyxx MW0YN+/VxYBXbF/bgElFH4N8Z92GEAqlEGySpk407qDR8i0z7qqkYs0SMhV4FCF+DSYp nDkdqHi8TZAhEJisquruIJCapAGdA5xO4GYzU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.11.17 with SMTP id 17mr551611ebk.113.1233646442857; Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:34:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <49877238.40507@onetel.com> References: <1bd550a00902020030q418d3dard3182490496f706e@mail.gmail.com> <49877238.40507@onetel.com> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:34:02 +0100 Message-ID: <1bd550a00902022334u1dc2182cg932ca7fc926a2f00@mail.gmail.com> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: Chris Whitehouse Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Screen problem on booting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 07:34:04 -0000 On 2/2/09, Chris Whitehouse wrote: > Fernando Apestegu=EDa wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I'm using FreeBSD 7.1-RELEASE-p2 > > > > Since a few days I've noticed something weird. On booting, all the > > text I see is shifted to the left, so I lose the first ten letters or > > so in every line of text. > > > > After login, once I type "startx" the X Window system seems to be OK > > _and_ if I go back to a console with Alt-Ctrl-Fn the console is fine > > again. > > > > My graphic card is an ATI Radeon HD2400. > > > > Anybody noticed it? > > > > Thanks in advance. > > > > PS: In console mode, reset command doesn't fix the problem. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > Adjust the horizontal position with the controls on the monitor while > booting? My LCD flat panel has an auto adjust button which does the same > thing. Yep, but the point is that it worked fine some time ago (probably with -p1, though I'm not sure). And as I said after using X, if I go back again to console mode, monitor settings are correct. Doesn't this means there is some kind of problem with video at start up? None of my other operating systems in that machine suffer this problem. Thanks > > > Chris > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 08:40:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9E1106566B for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:40:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4536E8FC08 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:40:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id n138euNo091406 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:40:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id n138eurf091405; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:40:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA10547; Tue, 3 Feb 09 00:34:44 PST Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:36:08 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: guru@unixarea.de Message-Id: <498801f8.23y2ybSzoxuxiwug%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20090202085740.GA4654@rebelion.Sisis.de> <200902020856.39396.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20090202180459.GA2625@rebelion.Sisis.de> <200902020934.38501.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20090203072647.GA2425@rebelion.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20090203072647.GA2425@rebelion.Sisis.de> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no cats at home, but system (7.0-STABLE) reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:40:57 -0000 > I'm searching for monkeys or intruders ... Brief power outage, perhaps? Some BIOS have a selection of what to do when power is restored from an outage, typical choices being to start up, remain off, or return to the state before power was lost. Others may offer only the first two, or be hardwired to one of them with no opportunity to choose a different behavior. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 09:33:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC7E106564A for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:33:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Apitz@oclc.org) Received: from mail.pica.nl (mail.pica.nl [192.87.44.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A9D8FC18 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:33:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Apitz@oclc.org) Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de ([10.0.1.29]) by mail.pica.nl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:33:54 +0100 Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.14.2/8.13.8/Submit) id n139XrLN005851; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:33:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to matthias.apitz@oclc.org using -f Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:33:53 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Message-ID: <20090203093353.GA5657@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20090202085740.GA4654@rebelion.Sisis.de> <200902020856.39396.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20090202180459.GA2625@rebelion.Sisis.de> <200902020934.38501.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20090203072647.GA2425@rebelion.Sisis.de> <498801f8.23y2ybSzoxuxiwug%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <498801f8.23y2ybSzoxuxiwug%perryh@pluto.rain.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE (i386) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Feb 2009 09:33:55.0052 (UTC) FILETIME=[882CF2C0:01C985E2] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no cats at home, but system (7.0-STABLE) reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:33:57 -0000 El día Tuesday, February 03, 2009 a las 12:36:08AM -0800, perryh@pluto.rain.com escribió: > > I'm searching for monkeys or intruders ... > > Brief power outage, perhaps? Some BIOS have a selection of what to > do when power is restored from an outage, typical choices being to > start up, remain off, or return to the state before power was lost. > Others may offer only the first two, or be hardwired to one of them > with no opportunity to choose a different behavior. note: the box is a laptop; I hit the power-off button and pulled out the 220V power cable of the power-supply from the outlet (that's why later the laptop after 2h uptime failed with battery empty); in which power outage you're thinking; what could re-boot the box after 36 minutes? thx matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.oclc.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 09:57:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D854B1065712 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:57:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93AEC8FC16 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:57:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LUI2Q-0005lW-Vn; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:57:55 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.238]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LUI2N-0002D1-Ht; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:57:47 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost.men.bris.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n139vlkr095671; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:57:47 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n139vjXH095628; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:57:45 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:57:45 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: gnome@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090203095745.GA90786@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: policykit fails to build on 7.1-stable i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:58:03 -0000 when building ports/sysutils/policykit on FBSD 7.1-stable i386 I get: Making all in man gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/policykit/work/PolicyKit-0.9/d oc/man' /usr/local/bin/xsltproc -nonet http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/curren t/manpages/docbook.xsl polkit-auth.xml I/O error : Attempt to load network entity http://docbook.sourceforge.net/releas e/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl warning: failed to load external entity "http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/ xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl" cannot parse http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook .xsl gmake[3]: *** [polkit-auth.1] Error 4 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/policykit/work/PolicyKit-0.9/do c/man' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/policykit/work/PolicyKit-0.9/do c' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/policykit/work/PolicyKit-0.9' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/policykit. What shall I do? many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 10:14:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764DD1065675 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:14:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nino80@gmail.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4378FC1E for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:14:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nino80@gmail.com) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id d26so212271eyd.7 for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:14:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2phTRQpchQjGspLrXn6JXiGJpTlnXQP/D259u1yVaI8=; b=J5wbsDfjBhsx5KATsn3UW4L+JmeTcs6GiwTuYFB6YvRlgRhS8UbwOHoXsNg0uhpH/z KRHK7xyk9VaD2Dj6voNR3uff8iR2n+gbyvnSsgPTqSo5rTcgTwR81PP3FdomGXTEE28/ PnBupVapVqCNMGsnCjHenTO/51DpJbxfkIUEw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Y0k5Oh20qHLTB78Qexrzp26fuClgazPz1d9LQ3f8iHKh0eJvP7fjGcbE2ru9wgeNMH /omn8hBYP/KQE6MiAVudMCMDDEVj+d5aZf3Wzuu8crofboePmOa0Xl6olN4erbT+VAJi MIhsKIdZfjTbxHTLKE3X71GVHi6+AgVdF8Bzg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.210.109.10 with SMTP id h10mr5109860ebc.39.1233656070834; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:14:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090202111902.52dcd8dd@gom.home> References: <4986B7EE.6060103@uni-altai.ru> <20090202111902.52dcd8dd@gom.home> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:14:30 +0100 Message-ID: <92bcbda50902030214ve4586ceibd63dc19e85b207c@mail.gmail.com> From: n j To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: apt of freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:14:32 -0000 Or you can try Debian GNU/kFreeBSD (http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu/) to get the best(?) of both worlds - FreeBSD kernel and GNU userland (aka use apt to install deb packages). -- Nino From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 10:25:05 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339B81065673; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:25:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E427A8FC1B; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:25:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LUISj-0007XL-Qe; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:25:04 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.238]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1LUISg-0002cd-DE; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:24:58 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost.men.bris.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n13AOvFF099497; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:24:57 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n13AOtVf099496; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:24:55 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:24:55 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20090203102455.GA99454@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20090203095745.GA90786@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090203095745.GA90786@mech-cluster238.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: policykit fails to build on 7.1-stable i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:25:05 -0000 On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 09:57:45AM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > when building ports/sysutils/policykit on FBSD 7.1-stable i386 I get: > > Making all in man > gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/policykit/work/PolicyKit-0.9/d > oc/man' > /usr/local/bin/xsltproc -nonet http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/curren > t/manpages/docbook.xsl polkit-auth.xml > I/O error : Attempt to load network entity http://docbook.sourceforge.net/releas > e/xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl > warning: failed to load external entity "http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/ > xsl/current/manpages/docbook.xsl" > cannot parse http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/manpages/docbook > .xsl > gmake[3]: *** [polkit-auth.1] Error 4 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/policykit/work/PolicyKit-0.9/do > c/man' > gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/policykit/work/PolicyKit-0.9/do > c' > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/sysutils/policykit/work/PolicyKit-0.9' > gmake: *** [all] Error 2 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/policykit. > > > What shall I do? The file seems to be there, I can get to it with lynx. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 12:28:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DF110656E5 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:28:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: from hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.14.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E308FC0A for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:28:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: FROM dell1 (Unknown [141.211.15.39]) BY hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 49883880.B3706.15794 ; 3 Feb 2009 07:28:48 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:27:18 -0500 From: William Bulley To: Brad Mettee Message-ID: <20090203122717.GA6430@dell1> Mail-Followup-To: Brad Mettee , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: short-changed on SD card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:28:53 -0000 According to Brad Mettee on Mon, 02/02/09 at 15:55: > > Does an XP machine also detect it as 960MB? If not, can you put more than > 960M on it and verify that it's all intact? Yes, Windows XP sees it as a 960MB FAT16 "drive". And when formatting it under Windows XP it never gave me the option to up this number, so somewhere (boot block, MBR?) the concept of 960MB is retained. > Create a 100MB zip file, put 10+ copies on the card. Then test to see if > the CRC is correct on all of the copies. If they're alls ok, then the card > is in fact 2GB. If you start getting errors on any of the files (and can > wipe/repeat the problem), then I'd say you've been ripped off and it's only > a 1GB card. Did you intend to have me put this ZIP file on the SD card using Windows XP or FreeBSD, or does it matter? I wish I didn't have to touch Windows XP at all, grrr... :-( Regards, web... -- William Bulley Email: web@umich.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 12:30:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E781065674 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:30:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from D.Forsyth@ru.ac.za) Received: from b.mail.ru.ac.za (b.mail.ru.ac.za [IPv6:2001:4200:1010::25:2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DB58FC1C for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:30:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from D.Forsyth@ru.ac.za) Received: from iwr.ru.ac.za ([146.231.64.249]:60678) by b.mail.ru.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LUKPt-000L9N-Jw; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:30:13 +0200 Received: from iwr61.iwr.ru.ac.za ([146.231.64.161]) by iwr.ru.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1LUKPt-000Jxq-JP; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:30:13 +0200 From: "DA Forsyth" Organization: IWR To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 14:30:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <498854F6.1389.2357B958@d.forsyth.ru.ac.za> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.41) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Virus-Scanned: b.mail.ru.ac.za (146.231.129.34) Cc: SlackWareWolf@comcast.net Subject: re: Patching / Updating / Upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: d.forsyth@ru.ac.za List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:30:23 -0000 Message: 4 Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:37:14 -0500 From: Akenner Subject: Patching / Updating / Upgrading To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Hello all, > So if anyone could lend a little but in typing out what they use for > updates and how they go about it, I'd appreciate it. I've already > gotten a full CVSup file sent to me by a member on here which was a > great help in deciding how to set up the file. I'm more or less > wondering with CVSup if I keep using RELEASE or do I use Stable. use RELEASE for a production server, STABLE on a desktop or test machine. IMHO use CVS if you have to build a custom kernel, I do this on my two production servers. On my minimal install print servers, I use freebsd-update about once a month. it is a bit fiddly to get through a proxy that needs auth, but it can be done. > And of course if anyone uses freebsd-update if they have suggestions > I'd love to hear those as well :) it works, it is quick, if you use the generic kernel. > -Allen -- DA Fo rsyth Network Supervisor Principal Technical Officer -- Institute for Water Research http://www.ru.ac.za/institutes/iwr/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 12:33:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FE07106564A for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:33:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: from hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.14.81]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4CBA8FC14 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: FROM dell1 (Unknown [141.211.15.39]) BY hackers.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 498839B5.1C9F5.16634 ; 3 Feb 2009 07:33:57 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:32:26 -0500 From: William Bulley To: Warren Block Message-ID: <20090203123226.GB6430@dell1> Mail-Followup-To: Warren Block , Jerry McAllister , Mel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Jerry McAllister , Mel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: short-changed on SD card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:33:59 -0000 According to Warren Block on Mon, 02/02/09 at 15:29: > > newfs_msdos(8) Learned something new there. Thanks! > It's generally not useful to slice/partition a small SD card. Without a > slice table, the whole device is just one slice. Agreed. I just want a big chuck of storage (in this case the 2.0 GB that I paid for, sigh...) and I don't care what format it is in. As I said, I am happy with FAT16 as long as I can use all (approximately) 2.0 GB of it. > Offhand I don't know if you can overwrite an existing slice table (boot > block) with just a 'newfs_msdos /dev/da1'. Probably. This is something I will try. > If not, you can just 'dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=512 cnt=1' and then > do the newfs_msdos. Okay. This is worth a try. > If you plan to use that card in a camera, you are a little safer doing a > "full" or "low-level" format with the card in the camera. Some cameras > create and like not-quite-right filesystems. Older Canon cameras, for > instance. This is not for use in a camera. It is just a quick and dirty way for me to grab (about) 2.0 GB from one FreeBSD system and plop it onto another. > Finally, there are more than a few reports of SD cards with false > capacities bought on ebay. This SD card was purchased from a reputable firm in New York whose name you would recognize were I to mention it. I have had nothing but good experiences buying from them in the past (many years > four). Regards, web... -- William Bulley Email: web@umich.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 12:36:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8548106566B for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:36:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: from hellskitchen.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.14.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803568FC08 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:36:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: FROM dell1 (Unknown [141.211.15.39]) BY hellskitchen.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 49883A40.3A13.19520 ; 3 Feb 2009 07:36:16 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:34:45 -0500 From: William Bulley To: Tim Judd Message-ID: <20090203123445.GC6430@dell1> Mail-Followup-To: Tim Judd , Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: short-changed on SD card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:36:18 -0000 According to Tim Judd on Mon, 02/02/09 at 18:13: > > Nobody's blamed the SD/CF reader. > > I call dibs to blame the SD/CF reader. Isolate the problem to find the > culprit... > > Check the USB reader -- I'm curious to see if that fixes the problem. This is a FANTASTIC suggestion - never occurred to me. I will have to try a different device with the same 2.0 GB card. Thanks! > And FYI -- No matter the Heads/Sectors/Cylinders, there are ~2000000 512byte > sectors, roughly equal to 1GB. Yep. > If it's not the adapter, you got cheated in the purchase. Thanks again. Regards, web... -- William Bulley Email: web@umich.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 12:38:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557E6106564A for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: from tombraider.mr.itd.umich.edu (smtp.mail.umich.edu [141.211.93.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F328FC08 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: FROM dell1 (Unknown [141.211.15.39]) BY tombraider.mr.itd.umich.edu ID 49883ACC.9CFBB.2560 ; 3 Feb 2009 07:38:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 07:37:05 -0500 From: William Bulley To: Mike Jeays Message-ID: <20090203123705.GD6430@dell1> Mail-Followup-To: Mike Jeays , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: short-changed on SD card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 12:38:38 -0000 According to Mike Jeays on Mon, 02/02/09 at 19:38: > > I think I would try dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da1 bs=1M > without the count option, and see how many blocks it writes. You at least > start with a clean slate, and can run fdisk and newfs, if you want a BSD-only > device. Make sure you write on the right device! So you don't think the "bad card reader" suggestion is relevant? I will also try this approach. Thanks for all the feedback. Now, I've got some avenues of testing to work through. Later... Regards, web... -- William Bulley Email: web@umich.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 13:18:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC23106564A for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:18:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slackwarewolf@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F448FC19 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slackwarewolf@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.36]) by QMTA07.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id BQ9H1b00D0mlR8UA7RJPkD; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:18:23 +0000 Received: from FreeBSD.UNIXMuse.goreBSD.org ([76.112.93.25]) by OMTA11.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id BRJN1b00C0Yq9Sc8XRJP8r; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:18:23 +0000 Message-ID: <4988441F.8010800@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:18:23 -0500 From: Akenner User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081220) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions References: <4987678A.5050802@comcast.net> <49877697.8030607@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <49877697.8030607@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Patching / Updating / Upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:18:25 -0000 *Snipping for those who don't want to have an inbox full of my text, and out of being polite* Thanks very much! I've been thinking about setting up another FreeBSD machine so I can test both CVS and FreeBSD-update without mixing the two together which from what I hear is a bad idea, and I think that would also help me learn both ways of doing it. Thanks again for the help! I think first I'll test out the freebsd-update way of things since, well, that's the closest to what I'm used to and will have a much smaller learning curve if any at all. Ad then I can set up a machine to do it with cvsup. I was really having some trouble understanding what they meant by RELEASE VS STABLE in the context of fixes and so on. The idea of it wasn't new as Slackware uses a very VERY similar method for talking about versions of their stuff, which I guess is a good thing. And my Slackware books used to have BSDi logos on them so I guess it's nice to see a Linux distro and BSD getting along. Patrick seems to be more appreciative of BSD than other Linux distros as it is. (If you read up on Slackware, he flat out tells you to just look for BSD texts because they are more technical and better written than the PR style Linux stuff you generally find) which leads me to believe that Patrick likes BSD quite a bit. Thanks again, -Allen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 13:32:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810A21065676 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:32:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E0A8FC25 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:32:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 8345632; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:32:44 -0500 Received: from [216.143.146.251] (account laura@radel.com HELO [172.20.0.6]) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP id 8345630; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:32:31 -0500 Message-ID: <4988476F.90906@radel.com> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:32:31 -0500 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthias Apitz References: <20090202085740.GA4654@rebelion.Sisis.de> <200902020856.39396.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20090202180459.GA2625@rebelion.Sisis.de> <200902020934.38501.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20090203072647.GA2425@rebelion.Sisis.de> <498801f8.23y2ybSzoxuxiwug%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20090203093353.GA5657@rebelion.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20090203093353.GA5657@rebelion.Sisis.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: no cats at home, but system (7.0-STABLE) reboots X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:32:45 -0000 Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Tuesday, February 03, 2009 a las 12:36:08AM -0800, perryh@pluto.rain.com escribió: > >>> I'm searching for monkeys or intruders ... >> Brief power outage, perhaps? Some BIOS have a selection of what to >> do when power is restored from an outage, typical choices being to >> start up, remain off, or return to the state before power was lost. >> Others may offer only the first two, or be hardwired to one of them >> with no opportunity to choose a different behavior. > > note: the box is a laptop; I hit the power-off button and pulled out the > 220V power cable of the power-supply from the outlet (that's why later > the laptop after 2h uptime failed with battery empty); in which power > outage you're thinking; what could re-boot the box after 36 minutes? > thx What communications cables were still plugged in, and is the BIOS set to boot in reaction to certain things happening on them? Have you read through all your BIOS settings looking for clues? --Jon Radel jon@radel.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 13:36:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1912D1065678 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:36:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from will.rutherdale@utoronto.ca) Received: from mail.vex.net (smaug.vex.net [208.76.104.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B708FC1C for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from will.rutherdale@utoronto.ca) Received: from [192.168.110.8] (unknown [207.35.13.175]) by mail.vex.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 59AC2174D5 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:36:36 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <49884864.2080101@utoronto.ca> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 08:36:36 -0500 From: William Gordon Rutherdale User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14ubu (X11/20080505) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd general questions References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: intel 64-bit version? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:36:38 -0000 I'm using the amd64 version of FreeBSD for an HP Pavillion using an Intel Core 2 Quad proc