From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 10 19:42:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAE181065673 for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebsta@t-online.de) Received: from mailout11.t-online.de (mailout11.t-online.de [194.25.134.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F45E8FC0A for ; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fwd13.aul.t-online.de (fwd13.aul.t-online.de ) by mailout11.t-online.de with smtp id 1Sdo0v-00028o-Er; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:41:29 +0200 Received: from seb.snet.local (rP1ACBZ1whQCn-359TRwjg-OG-oIwLF4Ae1H9l9I06KJqeTiigzLIId-5v0wyIVQ6s@[93.199.52.136]) by fwd13.t-online.de with esmtp id 1Sdo0v-01hamO0; Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:41:29 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278) From: Sebastian Stach In-Reply-To: <4FD30EA3.8060500@quip.cz> Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 21:41:03 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9F443301-7E86-44D2-8792-4198C827C25D@t-online.de> References: <4FCE37FC.1090405@gmail.com> <878874BA-2F5C-4A7E-8690-2A8A96536AE0@t-online.de> <4FCE6931.6010901@quip.cz> <4FCE786A.2030205@quip.cz> <4FCF2E6E.2040902@quip.cz> <3B262A53-C137-4E4E-B1B7-7471B1FBA258@t-online.de> <4FD30EA3.8060500@quip.cz> To: freebsd-stable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) X-ID: rP1ACBZ1whQCn-359TRwjg-OG-oIwLF4Ae1H9l9I06KJqeTiigzLIId-5v0wyIVQ6s X-TOI-MSGID: 3ce7dd93-1759-457f-83cc-6a569938a597 Subject: Re: em interfaces supermicro X9SCM-F board / X9SCA-F X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 19:42:59 -0000 Am 09.06.2012 um 10:51 schrieb Miroslav Lachman: > Hi, >=20 > I changed the switch to 1Gbps and run the test again. >=20 > No problems with the NICs. The iperf is running for 10 hours now. 2TB = of data was transmitted in both directions. >=20 > I am running an endless loop on a client side >=20 > while 1 > iperf -c xx.xx.xx.xx --format k -m -p 999 -t 1800 -d > sleep 5 > end >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Server listening on TCP port 999 > TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Client connecting to yy.yy.yy.yy, TCP port 999 > TCP window size: 137 KByte (default) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > [ 5] local xx.xx.xx.xx port 18834 connected with yy.yy.yy.yy port 999 > [ 4] local xx.xx.xx.xx port 999 connected with yy.yy.yy.yy port 59754 > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 4] 0.0-1800.0 sec 82823213 KBytes 376938 Kbits/sec > [ 4] MSS size 1448 bytes (MTU 1500 bytes, ethernet) > [ 5] 0.0-1800.0 sec 73954944 KBytes 336575 Kbits/sec > [ 5] MSS size 1448 bytes (MTU 1500 bytes, ethernet) >=20 >=20 > And another endless loop on server side >=20 > while 1 > iperf -s -p 999 > end >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Server listening on TCP port 999 > TCP window size: 64.0 KByte (default) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > [ 4] local yy.yy.yy.yy port 999 connected with xx.xx.xx.xx port 18834 > ------------------------------------------------------------ > Client connecting to xx.xx.xx.xx, TCP port 999 > TCP window size: 65.0 KByte (default) > ------------------------------------------------------------ > [ 6] local yy.yy.yy.yy port 59754 connected with xx.xx.xx.xx port 999 > Waiting for server threads to complete. Interrupt again to force quit. > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 6] 0.0-1800.0 sec 79.0 GBytes 377 Mbits/sec > [ 4] 0.0-1800.0 sec 70.5 GBytes 337 Mbits/sec >=20 >=20 > Client is on the Supermicro X9SCA-F >=20 > em0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu = 1500 = options=3D4219b > ether 00:25:90:73:d1:76 > inet xx.xx.xx.xx netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast xx.xx.xx.xx > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) > status: active >=20 >=20 > Server is running on the Cisco UCS C200 M2 >=20 > igb0: flags=3D8943 = metric 0 mtu 1500 = options=3D401bb > ether 50:57:a8:af:eb:0a > inet yy.yy.yy.yy netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast yy.yy.yy.yy > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) > status: active >=20 > Both sides are running FreeBSD 8.3-RELEASE amd64 GENERIC >=20 > So the only difference is that I am using NIC em0 in shared mode for = remote management. Can you try your test with shared mode? >=20 > Miroslav Lachman I did a test on my system again. My second NIC is working without = problems but the first one is still hanging after a while even when configured in = shared mode. I will contact the support again and if the issue cannot be resolved = shortly i will RMA the board. Thanks again for doing the test on your system. Sebastian Stach