From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 15 05:44:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29196106564A for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:44:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from s-utl01-sjpop.stsn.net (s-utl01-sjpop.stsn.net [72.254.0.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E56B8FC17 for ; Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from s-utl01-sjpop.stsn.net ([127.0.0.1]) by s-utl01-sjpop.stsn.net (SMSSMTP 4.1.2.20) with SMTP id M2009041422285307532 ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:28:53 -0700 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=9.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED: -2.867,BAYES_00: -1.665 X-Spam-Level: Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org ([10.64.87.166]) by s-utl01-sjpop.stsn.net (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher AES256-SHA (256 bits)); Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:28:51 -0700 Message-ID: <49E57076.7040509@elischer.org> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:28:22 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Macintosh/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Sam Fourman Jr." References: <20090413.220932.74699777.sthaug@nethelp.no> <49E41755.8050701@elischer.org> <49E48799.1000300@ibctech.ca> <20090414.212318.41684722.sthaug@nethelp.no> <11167f520904141722r16b537a9o58497c9719fb6fc5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <11167f520904141722r16b537a9o58497c9719fb6fc5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pcc@gmx.net, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, steve@ibctech.ca, sthaug@nethelp.no Subject: Re: Multiple default routes / Force external routing X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 05:44:29 -0000 Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:23 PM, wrote: >>>> I think you are rather confused about what Multiple FIBs is.. >>>> All it is is teh ability to make a packet use a particular >>>> FIB on it's outgoing path. There is not such thing as an interface >>>> being "In" a FIB. All interfaces are still visible to the routing code >>>> by default, and The IP stack still knows about them.I think the IP >>>> stack set's the 'loopback' flag on a packet regardless of the FIB >>>> selected if teh dest is one of its own addresses. >>>> >>>> What you want is VIMAGE. > > is VIMAGE fully integrated into FreeBSD 8 CURRENT? (I believe this > answer is no) > also is VIMAGE expected to make it into FreeBSD 8? not fully but a lot of it is under way > > Maybe Someone will give a VIMAGE update at BSDCan this year I'm hoping the report will be "try this option in your kernel" but real life tends to make these plans variable. > > Sam Fourman Jr.