From owner-cvs-all Fri Jan 11 12:20:25 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9293B37B400; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:20:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by flood.ping.uio.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id BC8D314C53; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 21:20:12 +0100 (CET) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_ioctl.c References: <200201100536.g0A5aao01807@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020110191209.A318@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20020110203918.A440@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20020111112851.A2103@kayak.xcllnt.net> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 11 Jan 2002 21:20:11 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20020111112851.A2103@kayak.xcllnt.net> Message-ID: Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Marcel Moolenaar writes: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 12:57:35PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Please provide references to those bugs. > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=673075+675491+/usr/local/www/db/text/2001/freebsd-stable/20011202.freebsd-stable > > http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=238427+0+current/freebsd-stable Right. So 1) no PR was filed (what do we have a PR system for anyway?) and 2) these messages contain no information about what the bug is, just (in one of them) a vague description of symptoms, so you don't even know if this is a real fix or just a workaround. > > Wrong. Linprocfs doesn't need fixing. Please back out your incorrect, > > poorly though-out and poorly tested commits, or I will. > It looks like you backed out reason already. Clearly there's no point > in talking it over first. Whatever you want, Des... Since when does "talking it over first" mean "commit a patch without discussing it with the person who wrote the code it changes"? Especially when similar patches have been suggested, discussed, and rejected before (see for instance the audit trail for PR 26546). DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message