From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Sep 4 12:29:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18DE37B400 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 12:29:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 413F343E42 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 12:29:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from johann@broadpark.no) Received: from aegis.terrabionic.com (ninja.terrabionic.com [217.13.29.51]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FD1E7EE2 for ; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 21:29:35 +0200 (MEST) Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 21:29:31 +0200 From: Janine C.Buorditez To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Bad package system, BAAD. And; tbz2 -- WTF(ine) is this? Message-Id: <20020904212931.5728b785.johann@broadpark.no> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.6) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello. Why make packages in tbz2 when pkg_add doesn't understand it, and why not make the -r feature take packages from ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/*/* instead of ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4-stable/Latest/? Will 5.0's ports/package management system prove to rock better? Thanks. --Janine To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message