Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:36:18 -0700 From: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Justin Hibbits <chmeeedalf@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD PowerPC ML <freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Boost 1.55.0 (Was: Re: PowerPC Packages) Message-ID: <53AC4C02.2030405@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20140626154416.GD24440@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <539DC0C5.60603@freebsd.org> <20140623131222.GA26450@FreeBSD.org> <20140625073340.GA57075@FreeBSD.org> <20140625072305.45baf39b@zhabar.att.net> <20140626100258.GA47002@FreeBSD.org> <53AC3DB2.3070902@freebsd.org> <20140626154416.GD24440@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/26/14 08:44, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 08:35:14AM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> On 06/26/14 03:02, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 07:23:05AM -0700, Justin Hibbits wrote: >>>> As I mentioned earlier, you can set "FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc" in >>>> make.conf, and it'll build with gcc47. >>> FAVORITE_COMPILER looks more like a hack to me. Ideally boost's port >>> Makefile should be fixed instead. >>> >>> I also would rather use system compiler (whether it's gcc4.2 or clang) >>> instead of gcc47. >>> >>> ./danfe >>> >> Yes, it should be made to respect whatever cc is. > As long as cc is supported upstream, boost being a nightmare to maintain I will > reject all patches that are not accepted upstream first, otherwise bumping to > 1.56 will be painful. > > That said I fully support the effort. > > regards, > Bapt Surely there's a way to pass the compiler that you want to bjam at the command line. -Nathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?53AC4C02.2030405>