From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 11:48:06 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165D116A417 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:48:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msherman77@yahoo.com) Received: from web88309.mail.re4.yahoo.com (web88309.mail.re4.yahoo.com [216.39.53.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 93E9D13C461 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:48:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msherman77@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 85111 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Nov 2007 11:21:17 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=WzBspJWfI6HH7ujIl0SlJmNExH2PC9m6Dj8D+/n+5QdHWN+jXXd/zXS5KbJmowVJIWv7ozVxdDQQb77pPT3Yg+CRsTkUvtV7CLY81z075yeLWoxvIuc52adr1MCWvRmq/n9k0E01i7TmKqEr9YYNl6c3KyOWKaSbTn/Bh7Bu1o8=; X-YMail-OSG: 9J1Dp30VM1k0hJMl6E_80Yp.SQ89DY56Y5FldgUKppXJkCh29zTal_cZ_XpkVmnUnJs189pFXz50UlokcYrxWgZxiWgSs4fW0_4gb7kUTBk8D2tULxFkZ7.0gUPXWHCKqgL.tnV3DWJN9Vw- Received: from [204.253.245.126] by web88309.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 06:21:17 EST Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 06:21:17 -0500 (EST) From: Michael S To: FreeBSD Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <882887.83136.qm@web88309.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Subject: binary compatibility 6.2 -> 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:48:06 -0000 Good day all, I am running 6.2 with patches, however my package_site points to 6-stable. Upgrading binary packages gives this message: Undefined symbol "__sbmaskrune". >From the few results Google returned, I realized that the packages in 6-stable are for the upcoming 6.3. I thought that major branches were compatible. Am I wrong? Michael Michael Sherman http://msherman77.blogspot.com/