From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 11 10:35:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9EDC16A41B for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:35:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timo.schoeler@riscworks.net) Received: from relay.riscworks.net (v32231.1blu.de [88.84.154.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A097A13C458 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:35:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timo.schoeler@riscworks.net) Received: from zoidberg.riscworks.net (f054173084.adsl.alicedsl.de [78.54.173.84]) by relay.riscworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC026136E0002; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:35:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from G4.local (unknown [192.168.100.101]) by zoidberg.riscworks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE92328AA4; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:35:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47874672.10804@riscworks.net> Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:35:30 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?VGltbyBTY2jCmm9lbGVy?= Organization: RISCworks User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" References: <3545.1200041730@critter.freebsd.dk> <47873174.4040802@gmail.com> <47873B06.9010603@riscworks.net> <4787457C.4050209@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4787457C.4050209@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD's problems as seen by the BSDForen.de community X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:35:32 -0000 thus Aryeh M. Friedman spake: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > >> The license is *perfect* and works for decades now. I'm pretty sure >> people know when they can 'effort' it to contribute to an OSS >> prject like FreeBSD. If they have time to do so and the will to do >> so, they will do it. If not, then they won't do it. >> >> The license is not responsible for coders' lives in a way to make >> sure they can 'live' (rent an appartment, eat, drink, whatever). >> >> Furthermore: Even the GPL does not regulate this. >> >> (Total waste of time...) > > Accept to direct most of this to the hopefully newly created -legal@ > list I doubt there will be such a list. Maybe they should just create a /dev/null-likeee list called flames@ ? > just let me say forcing people to pick between morals and money > has never been a good option. True, as money is on the place in the universe where morals is at maximum distance to. However, is there anyone including yourself able to follow your wannabemetaphyisical killing spree? > - -- > Aryeh M. Friedman