From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Aug 30 19:15:58 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 692CF3C5A4E for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:15:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from kicp.uchicago.edu (kicp.uchicago.edu [128.135.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BfjjT346xz4MYF for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:15:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from [192.168.43.231] (unknown [172.58.142.219]) (Authenticated sender: galtsev) by kicp.uchicago.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C427D4E6A6; Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:15:50 -0500 (CDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.1\)) Subject: Re: (very OT) Ideal partition schemes (history of partitioning) From: Valeri Galtsev In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:15:49 -0500 Cc: Ralf Mardorf , FreeBSD Mailing List , Polytropon Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1C1D6F50-D629-4475-A408-2B5FDF4F1022@kicp.uchicago.edu> References: <20200829154417.8dd5f83d.freebsd@edvax.de> <20200830085848.68ab4832@archlinux> <20200830083908.c7cc67a23306c90d51f5e446@sohara.org> <20200830172126.5332f0eb.freebsd@edvax.de> <20200830191432.7c02fd62@archlinux> To: Aryeh Friedman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.1) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4BfjjT346xz4MYF X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=uchicago.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.135.20.70) smtp.mailfrom=galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.06 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[uchicago.edu : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.25)[0.246]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.50)[-0.497]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[172.58.142.219:received]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.21)[0.208]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; ASN(0.00)[asn:160, ipnet:128.135.0.0/16, country:US]; SUSPICIOUS_RECIPS(1.50)[]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2020 19:15:58 -0000 > On Aug 30, 2020, at 1:23 PM, Aryeh Friedman = wrote: >=20 > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 1:14 PM Ralf Mardorf > wrote: >=20 >> On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 17:21:26 +0200, Polytropon wrote: >>>=20 >>> Rule: "Better have 100 photos and select 10 good ones, instead >>> of having only 10 photos which are all crap." ;-) >>=20 >> The averaged 36 photos and then replacing the film cartridge gave >> holiday as well as professional photographers the opportunity to = think. >> They not necessarily used this opportunity, let alone that some used >> very long films for way more than 36 photos. >>=20 >=20 > Completely incorrect about professional photography (at least after > autowinders became available): >=20 I know loose cannon will unleash on me, but I still can not hold it. My observation about professionals (in any profession, not just a = photography) is: they do posses excellent set of skills, and they = simultaneously recognize that there are other professionals in this same = field who posselearningss some skills they don=E2=80=99t. Doesn=E2=80=99t = mean someone is better or worse. Anybody declaring in one way or another = he/she is the one with correct/best professional skills immediately sets = the flag for me as quite likely not actually being an expert. That is akin well known stages of learning: 1. I don=E2=80=99t know anything 2. I know something 3. I know everything 4. I know quite a lot but not everything 5. I know a lot, and I know what I know and what I don=E2=80=99t know The last (5) is equivalent of an expert (I am just replacing the word = =E2=80=9Cprofessional=E2=80=9D by what it implies), whereas (3) though = quite likely to declare being an expert, most likely is not. Those are my humble observations. Of a person never considering oneself = an expert, though often knowing what I know and what I don=E2=80=99t. Valeri > 1. In photoshoots (modeling or otherwise) once they got the rough > pose/layout they wanted they would be shooting away as fast the = autowinder > would move puring roll after roll of film to get that "perfect" shot = (watch > any video of photoshoots before digital came in but after autowinding) >=20 > 2. As a student reporter I covered the anti-war protests on the first = night > of first Gulf War in San Francisco with hand cranked my 35mm Cannon = (no > idea of the model number) and in the course of the night used 4 rolls = 500 > ASA film and one roll of 1000 ASA film (which I bought off a = professional > news photographer). I noticed that every single one of the = professional > news photographers was shooting at least one roll of a scene that I = took > one (or maybe) two snapshots off due to the lack of film. > --=20 > Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"