Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 01:19:01 -0700 From: Murray Stokely <murray@FreeBSD.org> To: Cyrille Lefevre <cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net> Cc: Nik Clayton <nik@freebsd.org>, Mark Valentine <mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk>, qa@freebsd.org Subject: Re: docproj package and 4.6 CD-ROM Message-ID: <20020807011901.O23798@freebsdmall.com> In-Reply-To: <20020725030606.GF4475@gits.dyndns.org>; from cyrille.lefevre@laposte.net on Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 05:06:06AM %2B0200 References: <200207132220.g6DMK6uM050406@dotar.thuvia.org> <20020724214342.GI58018@clan.nothing-going-on.org> <20020725030606.GF4475@gits.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 05:06:06AM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 10:43:42PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 11:20:06PM +0100, Mark Valentine wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:29:53PM +0100, Mark Valentine wrote:
> > > > > Any idea why the docproj binary package didn't make it onto CD-ROM #3 for
> > > > > the 4.6 release (it's listed in src/release/scripts/print-cdrom-packages.sh)?
> > > > >
> > > > > Is it because it's interactive unless JADETEX is defined?
> > > >
> > > > how about to have a subport such as docproj-jadetex which just
> > > > define JADETEX and to make docproj non-interactive in all cases ?
> > >
> > > I suggested docproj and docproj-nojadetex on the doc mailing list back
> > > in March. I don't particularly care which way around it is, but my preference
> > > would be to have jadetex by default.
> >
> > Send a PR with port skeleton attached, and I'm sure it'll be committed.
>
> done. you will have the choice between docproj-jadetex and docproj-nojadetex :P
Thanks. I've now updated print-cdrom-packages.sh to take advantage of
this new distinction.
- Murray
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020807011901.O23798>