From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sun May 28 16:13:18 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B517BD85FD5 for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 16:13:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C9571E0F for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 16:13:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v4SGDIZV032324 for ; Sun, 28 May 2017 16:13:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219618] PKG opencv2 but port opencv - which to upgrade? Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 16:13:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: darin@technotic.ca X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 May 2017 16:13:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219618 Bug ID: 219618 Summary: PKG opencv2 but port opencv - which to upgrade? Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: darin@technotic.ca Hello! I have decided to get my feet wet by contributing to the ports then documentation for FreeBSD, since I love this community SO much! I wish to upgrade the current port opencv from the current 2.4.13.1 to 3.x= but have come across a conflict between the port and pkg name: root@seedbox:/usr/ports/graphics/opencv # pkg search opencv | egrep -v "java|core|cvs|plug|py" opencv2-2.4.13.1_6 Open Source Computer Vision library root@seedbox:/usr/ports/graphics/opencv # find ../* -name opencv ../opencv root@seedbox:/usr/ports/graphics/opencv # grep -r 2.4 . ./distinfo:SHA256 (opencv-opencv-2.4.13.1_GH0.tar.gz) =3D 0d5ce5e0973e3a745f927d1ee097aaf909aae59f787be6d27a03d639e2d96bd7 ./distinfo:SIZE (opencv-opencv-2.4.13.1_GH0.tar.gz) =3D 91773677 ./Makefile:PORTVERSION=3D 2.4.13.1 ./files/patch-cmake__OpenCVFindLibsGUI.cmake:+++ ./cmake/OpenCVFindLibsGUI.cmake 2013-12-10 09:22:40.000000000 -0500 ./files/patch-cmake__OpenCVVersion.cmake:--- ./cmake/OpenCVVersion.cmake.or= ig=20=20 2013-10-24 00:12:48.000000000 -0400 Should I upgrade the opencv port and request the pkg name be changed later = on to prevent conflicts or work on the opencv2 port in order to align with the current pkg name? Cheers, --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=